Resolving Business Disputes Through Small Claims Court To Support The Ease Of Doing Business In Indonesia (Comparison: Netherlands And Malaysia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/5yr34v30Keywords:
Easy Going Business,, Business Dispute Resolutions.Abstract
In a business conflict, dispute resolution process that fast and provides legal certainty are necessity for justice seekers. The principle of justice that is fast, effective, efficient and low-cost is something that is highly expected in the process of settling a civil case in court. However, in reality, the dispute resolution procedure under the Civil Procedure Code in the court is still felt to be too long process, and the procedure is complicated and raises costs that are quite high. Therefore, addressing these conditions requires a Civil Procedure Law mechanism that can resolve a business dispute whose value is not too expensive with a simple and fast procedure. To overcome this problem, the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning Simple Laws was issued as one of the mechanisms for resolving business disputes. This shows that basically the Supreme Court strongly support the process of resolving a case quickly, easily, cheaply and does not too long process. Law enforcement through the handling of business disputes in the Court that are fast, effective, efficient, light costs with a relatively short period of time become one of the indicators in creating a climate of easy going business in the business field in Indonesia. The problems that are to be examined are how to implement business dispute resolution through a small claim court in court in creating a climate of business convenience in the business field in Indonesia. This research in relation to the mechanism of settlement of disputes through small claim court was carried out in 2 (two) courts, the Denpasar Bali District Court, Depok District Court In addition, the research was also carried out by comparing of small claim court procedures in the Netherlands and Malaysia. The research method used in reviewing the legal issues examined is to use a normative juridical research method through library studies to obtain secondary data, as well as using a comparative approach.
Keywords:
Downloads
References
[1] M. Yahya Harahap. Kedudukan, Kewenangan Dan Acara Peradilan Agama: Undang-UndangNomor 7 Tahun 1989. Jakarta: Pustaka Kartini. 2001.
[2] Mahkamah Agung.NaskahAkademik Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung. 2015.
[3] Peter MahmudMaruki.Penelitian Hukum. 3rd Ed. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup. 2005
[4] R. Tresna. Komentar HIR. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita. 1989.
[5] Rachmadi Usman. PilihanSengketa di LuarPengadilan. Bandung: PT Cipta Aditya Bakti. 2003.
[6] RidwanMansyurdan D.Y. Witanto. Gugatan Sederhana Teori, Praktik dan Permasalahannya. Jakarta: Pustaka Dunia. 2017.
[7] Satrawidjaja. Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Bandung: Alumni. 2006.
[8] Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum.3rd Ed. Jakarta:Penerbit Universitas Indonesia. 2012.
[9] Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. SuatuTinjauan Singkat.16th Ed. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. 2014.
[10] Sri Mamudji, et.al.Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. 2005.
42European Judicial Network, Small claims – Netherlands, https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_small_claims-42-nl- en.do?member=1, accessed on21 August 2018.
[11] Sudikno Mertokusumo. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. 7th Ed. Yogyakarta: Liberty. 2006.
[12] Surakhmad Winarso. Metode dan Tekhnik dalam bukunya, Pengantar Penelitian Ilmiah Dasar Metode Teknik. Bandung: Tarsito. 1994.
[13] Bowmer Nuiten Legal Advocaten. “Das niederländische Rechtssystem”, https://www.veldlaw.nl/du/nl- rechtssystem.
[14] Conventus Law. Malaysia - Practical Guide To Small Claims Action. http://www.conventuslaw.com/report/malaysia-practical-guide-to-small-claims-action/.
[15] De rechtspraak, “Organisatie Rechtspraak”. https://www.rechtspraak.nl/Organisatie-en- contact/Organisatie/Paginas/default.aspx.
[16] European Judicial Network, Small claims-Netherlands. https://e-justice.europa.eu/content_small_claims- 42-nl-en.do?member=1.
[17] Galih Gumelar. Menakar Mimpi Jokowi masuk 40 Besar Indeks Kemudahan Berusaha http://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20170609011802-92-220477/menakar-mimpi -jokowi-masuk-40- besar-indeks-kemudahan-bisnis.
[18] http://www.doingbusiness.org/rangkings.
[19] http://www.europe.eu/legislation_summaries.
[20] Adi Nur Rohman and Sugeng. “Probability Mekanisme Small Claim Court Dalam PenyelesaianSengketaWaris Di Pengadilan Agama”. JurnalHukum dan Peradilan 7(3). Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan PengembanganHukum dan PeradilanMahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. 2018.
[21] AstimRiyanto.“SistemHukum Negara-Negara Asia Tenggara”.Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 37(2).2017.
[22] David J. Gerber. “Globalization and Knowledge: Implications for Comparative Law”. Tul. LRev. 75. 2001.
[23] “Understanding Regulations for Small and Medium Size Enterprises”.Doing Business 2014. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. 2013.
[24] EfaLaelaFakhriah. “Mekanisme Small Claim Court Dalam Mewujudkan Tercapainya Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan”. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum 25(2). 2013.
[25] John C. Reitz. “How To Do Comparative Law”. Am. J Comp46 . 1998.
[26] Norma Sari.“Malaysia - Practical Guide To Small Claims Action”. Padjadjaran Journal of Law. 5(1). 2018.
[27] Yvonne Tew.“The Malaysian Legal System: A Tale of Two Courts. Georgetown University Law Center”.Commonwealth Jud. 19. 2011
[28] Muh. Ridha Hakim. “Implementasi Gugatan sederhana Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Keadilan Melalui Pemenuhan Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Murah”. Evaluasi Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana. Jakarta: Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil, Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. 2018.
[29] Sri Gilang Muhammad Sultan Rahma Putra et.al. “GugatanS ederhana (Suatu Catatan Pembuka),” Evaluasi Perma Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana. Jakarta. Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil, Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. 2018.
[30] European Judicial Enforcement, The European Small Claims Procedure in the Netherrlands. 2012.
[31] Malaysia Rules of Court 2012 O.93. Malaysia. Attorney General Chambers. 2012.
[32] Pemerintah Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah AgungNomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Gugatan Sederhana. Jakarta. Mahkamah Agung. 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
