Analysis of Vendor Selection Using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fahp) (Case Study: Pt Pos Logistic Bandung)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/b8gyvc89Keywords:
Vendor Selection, FAHP, Expert, Decision Making.Abstract
The purpose of this study is to choose the best goods distribution vendor of PT Pos Logistic Bandung. Vendors are one of the main factors that influence the speed of delivery. Good decision making based on the results of vendor selection can improve performance in sales and operation management. Data were collected by conducting interviews and questionnaires to three expert in the sales and operations department. Data were analyzed using the Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy method (FAHP) by converting the weight of the questionnaire to a triangular fuzzy number, calculating the fuzzy synthetic extent, vector, defuzzification ordinate, and normalizing the vector fuzzy value. Weights using the FAHP method will be compared with the results of the Expert Choice weights. The results of the study can be used by PT Pos Logistic sales and operation management in making decisions based on the conditions of the available vendors, the selected vendor is PT X with a weight of 0.300 (FAHP) and 0.452 (Expert Choice), both methods produce different weight values but the same selected vendor. This research can be developed specifically with the Topsis method by considering customer satisfaction. Based on previous research, several studies are used to weigh in choosing vendors, but not many have combined FAHP with Expert Choice.
Downloads
References
[1] Asuquo, D. E., Onuodu, F. E., 2016. A Fuzzy AHP Model for selection of university academic staff. International Journal of Computer Applications, 141, p. 975.
[2] Boran, F.E., Genç, S., Kurt, M., and Akay, D., (2009) “A Multi Criteria Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision Making for Supplier Selection with TOPSIS Method”, Expert Systems with Applications Vol. 36 (8), 11363-11368.
[3] De Boer, L., Labro, E. and Morlacchi, P., (2001) “A Review of Methods Supporting Suppliers Selection”, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management Vol. 7(2), 75-89.
[4] Demirtas, E.A., and Üstün, O., (2009) “Analytic Network Process and Multi Period Goal Programming Integration in Purchasing Decisions”, Computers & Industrial Engineering Vol. 56(2), 677-690.
[5] Dickson, G.W., (1966) “An Analysis of Vendor Selection Systems and Decision”. Journal of Purchasing Vol.2 (1), 5-17.
[6] D'onofrio, B. M., 2011. Consequences of separation / Divorce for children, p. 1.
[7] Ghodsypour, S.H., and O‟Brien, C., (1998) “A Decision Support System for Supplier Selection Using an Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process and Linear Programming”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 56-57(20), 199-212.
[8] Izhar, M.F., Azlan, K., Farhan, m., 2019. Determining the Causes of Divorce in Perlis Using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Jurnal Intelek Universiti Teknologi MARA Vol. 14 (1)
[9] Jolai, F., Yazdian, S.A., Shahanaghi, K., and Khojasteh, M.A., (2011) “Integrating Fuzzy TOPSIS and Multi Period Goal Programming for Purchasing Multiple Products from Multiple Suppliers”, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol.17 (1), 42-53.
[10] Kilic, H.S., (2013) “An integrated approach for supplier selection in multi item/multi supplier environment”, Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 37 (14-15), 7752-7763.
[11] Krajewsld, L.J., and Ritzman, L.P., (1996) Operations Management Strategy and Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., London, UK.
[12] Liao, C.N., and Kao, H.P., (2011) “An Integrated Fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP Approach to Supplier Selection in Supply Chain Management”, Expert Systems with Application Vol.38 (9), 10803-10811.
[13] Önüt, S., Kara, S.S., and Işık, E, (2009) “Long Term Supplier Selection Using a Combined Fuzzy MCDM Approach: A Case Study for a Telecommunication Company”, Expert Systems with Applications Vol. 36(2), 3887- 3895.
[14] Saaty, T. L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy processes. Education, p. 1.
[15] Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S.F. and Yazdankhak, A., (2010) “Group Decision Making Process for Suppliers Selection with VIKOR Under Fuzzy Environment”, Expert Systems with Applications Vol. 37 (1), 24-30.
[16] Singh, B., 2016. Analytical hierarchical process (AHP) and fuzzy AHP applications-A review paper. International Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 8, p. 4925.
[17] Vaidya, O. S., Kumar, S., 2006. Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169, p. 1.
[18] Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., 2011. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52, p. 541.
[19] Weber, C.A., Current J.R. and Benton, W.C. (1991) “Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods”, European Journal of Operational Research Vol.50 (1), 2-18.
[20] Xia, W. and Wu, Z., (2007) “Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments”, Omega, Vol. 35(5), 494-504.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
