(E.M.G) Some muscles and angles performance in the stages of up and down the slopes (8º)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/fzcfg386Keywords:
Impulse, Impact, Runner, KinematicAbstract
The aim of the study was to know the muscular activity and the performance angles that are appropriate for uphill and downhill of the slopes at (8°), therefore, the researchers opine to do this study to know the fact of this discussion that they will find through the magnitude of the working muscles’ participation during the two stages, that’s all by the electrical muscle activity device (EMG) and kinematic analysis, the remaining muscles are involved and used in the research to increase the space of the study to discover other muscles that might participate and have benefit by developing them during the giving of this type of training. The problem of the research came through the questioning of some training specialists, that uphill training improves and develops the step of the runners, while during downhill training the speed and frequency of the runners are developed. This leads us to the training fact of muscles’ development by choosing the type of slope training and whether it’s uphill or downhill. The research sample represented by (6) speed runners (100) m in Track and field, season (2018-2019), the experiment occurred on one of the slopes that exist in the College of Physical Education and Sports Science/ University of Baghdad. The researchers extracted (Mean) by the program (SPSS) of processing data. The researchers concluded that the training of the uphill slope develops the length of the step of running, while the downhill drill development of the step frequency.
Downloads
References
1. James M Smoliga, Joseph B Myers, Mark Redfern, Scott M Lephart. (2010). Reliability and precision of EMG in leg, torso, and arm muscles during running. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 20, p7.
2. William P. Ebben. (2008). The Optimal Downhill Slope for Acute Overspeed Running. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, p88.
3. Bissas IA, Cooke CB, Paradisis GP. (2002). The effects of uphill–downhill sprint running on maximum speed and acceleration rates. In: Koskolou M, ed. 7th Annual Congress of the Proceedings of the European College of Sports Science, July 24–28, Athens-Greece. Athens: Pashladis Medical Publisher; 24–28.
4. Costello F. (1985). Training for speed using resisted and assisted methods. (NSCA J). 7:74–75.
5. W Kakihana. S Suzuki. (2001). The EMG Activity and Mechanics of Running Jump as a Function of take-off angle. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 11.
6. Facciono, A. (1994). Assisted and resisted methods for speed development. ((part II): resisted speed methods). Mod Athl Coach. 32:3–6 .
7. Facciono, A. (1992). Resisted and assisted methods for speed development. (part one). Strength Cond Coach. 1:10–11.
8. Kunz, H., & Kaufmann, D. Winter, (1981). Biomechanics of hill sprinting. Track Tech. 2603– 2605.
9. Paradisis, G., & Cooke, C. (2001). Kinematic and postural characteristics of sprint running on slope surfaces. J Sports Sci 19:149-159.
10. Jean Slawinski, Sylvain Dorel, François Hug1, Antoine Couturier, Valentin Fournel, Jean-Benoit Morin, and Christine Hanon. (2008). Elite long sprint running: A comparison between incline and level training sessions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 40:1155–1162 .
11. Tziortzis, S. (1991). Effects of training methods in sprinting performance. Athens, Greece: Doctoral Dissertation. University of Athens, Dept. of Physical Education and Sport Science.
12. Paradisis, G., & Cooke, C. (2006). The effects of sprint running training on sloping surfaces. 4(20), J Strength Cond Res. 767–777.
13. Giorgos P. Paradisis, Athanassios Bissas, and Carlton B. Cooke. (2009). Combined Uphill and Downhill Sprint Running Training Is More Efficacious Than Horizontal. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 4, p.240 .
14. Gianluca Vernillo, Marle`ne Giandolini, W. Brent Edwards, Jean-Benoıˆt Morin, Pierre Samozino, Nicolas Horvais, Guillaume Y. Millet. (2016). Biomechanics and Physiology of Uphill and Downhill Running. in Sports Medicine, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 47(4), p615-629.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
