Fire Impact Assessment of Flammable Fuel Storage in Heat Treatment Plant Using Fire Dynamic Simulator

Authors

  • V.Kurinji Department of Mechanical Engineering, Academy of Maritime Education and Training, Chennai. Author
  • R.Rajkumar Department of Applied Science and Technology, Anna University, Chennai. Author
  • S.Prabhakaran Department of Marine Engineering, Academy of Maritime Education and Training, Chennai. Author
  • K.Umanath Department of Mechanical Engineering, Academy of Maritime Education and Training, Chennai. Author
  • D.S.Balaji Department of Mechanical Engineering, Academy of Maritime Education and Training, Chennai. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/886v2e83

Keywords:

Fire Impact Assessment, Flammable Fuel Storage, Heat Treatment, Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS)

Abstract

Today we use highly durable materials in our day to day life. Some material used for manufacturing of mechanical components and infrastructure projects requires high strength and durability. To make a component highly durable heat treatment is done to fulfill the requirement of particular needs of a component. The Heat Treatment process increases the strength of the material by modifying their metallurgical properties. In Heat Treatment facility, the fire hazards are comparatively high and even a single fire accident may be catastrophic due to the congested and complex layout of the facility. This study proposes a novel methodology for modelling the impact of a fire event in a Heat Treatment facility. Hazard identification and accident credibility assessment have been used to discover the most credible fire accident scenarios. These scenarios have been simulated using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code, Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS). The results have then been compared to identify the most severe impact of the fire on personnel and assets using thermal radiation and risk levels. It has been found that the fire event in scenarios has a high potential to cause damage to adjacent assets. From this comparison, it is evident that the scenario in the fuel storage and transmission pipe lines in the combustion process has the highest risk of fire to both personnel and assets. The proposed methodology may be adapted further for safety measure design to mitigate or avoid the impacts of a fire event in any complex processing facility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Maroš Krajčíra, Jana Müllerová (2017) “3D small-scale fire modeling testing preparation”, Procedia Engineering 192 480-485.

2. Qiang Liu, Zhili Chen, Hongtao Liu, Wenqi Yin, Yi Yang (2017) “CFD simulation of fire dike overtopping from catastrophic ruptured tank at oil depot”, Journal of Loss Prevention in process Industries 1-10.

3. Til Baalisampang, Rouzbeh Abbassi,Vikram Garaniya, Faisal Khan, Mohammad Dadashzadeh (2017) “Fire impact assessment in FLNG processing facilities using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)”, Fire Safety Journal 92 42-52.

4. Dominik Hermann (2017) “Identification of Fire Modelling Issues Based on an Analysis of Real Events from the OECD FIRE Database”, Nuclear Engineering and Technology 49 342-348.

5. A.Yu. Snegirev, A.S. Tsoy (2015) “Treatment of local extinction in CFD fire modelling”, Proceeding of the Combustion Institute 35 2519-2526.

6. Greg Bakera, Colleen Wade, Michael Spearpoint, Charley Fleischmann (2013) “Developing probabilistic design fires for performance-based fire safety engineering”, Procedia Engineering 62 639-647.

7. Kristopher J. Overholt and Ofodike A. Ezekoye (2012) “Characterizing Heat Release Rates Using an Inverse Fire Modelling Technique”, Fire Technology Vol.48, 893-909.

8. Greg Bakera, Michael Spearpoint, Kevin Frank, Colleen Wade, Shahriar Sazegar (2017) “The impact of user decision-making in the application of computational compartment fire models”, Fire Safety Journal 91 (2017) 964- 972.

9. Dwi Arini, Fitri Pancawardani, Muhammad A. Santoso, Bambang Sugiarto,Yulianto S. Nugrohoa (2017) “Froude modelling of fire phenomena: observation of fire-induced smoke movement in basement structure for firefighting purpose”, Procedia Engineering 170 182-188.

10. Wolfram Jahn (2010) “Inverse Modelling to Forecast Enclosure Fire Dynamics”, Phd.Thesis University of Edinburgh.

11. A.R. Sivaram, R. RajaveL, K. Umanath, S. Ruban kumar & S. B. Narayana swamy, A technical review on emulsion fuel with nano additives, International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development, Vol. 8, Special Issue 7, Oct 2018, 1196-1200.

12. K. Srividhya, R. Rajavel, K. Umanath, A.R. Sivaram, V. Srinivas, N. Jayakumar, Effects of fuel injection timing, injection angle, ignition position on emission and spraycharacteristics - An overview, J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst. 9 (2017) 818–825.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

V.Kurinji, R.Rajkumar, S.Prabhakaran, K.Umanath, & D.S.Balaji. (2020). Fire Impact Assessment of Flammable Fuel Storage in Heat Treatment Plant Using Fire Dynamic Simulator. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 14139-14145. https://doi.org/10.61841/886v2e83