Teaching Science with Technology: A Pedagogical Hypermedia for the Science Discipline

Authors

  • Aseel O. Ajlouni Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Educational Sciences, The University of Jordan Author
  • Suhair A. Jaradat Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Educational Sciences, The University of Jordan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/y4ktae92

Keywords:

hypermedia, self-regulation, pedagogical design, scientific concept, motivation

Abstract

This is a research and development (R&D) study presenting the design and development of a pedagogical hypermedia environment for the science discipline (PHFSD) targeted fifth-grade students. It was developed based on a five-development model according to pedagogical hypermedia design, constructivist principles, and science curriculum. The PHFSD is intended to support fifth-grade students learn science, motivate them to learn the subject, enhance their scientific concept acquisition, and prompt their self-regulated learning skills. The PHFSD’s quality was evaluated by a panel of experts and implemented on 50 fifth grade students in a private school in Amman, the result reveled that the quality of PHFSD is very good, it is efficient for learning and teaching, and appropriate for the targeted audience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Al-Mansour, A. C. (2018). Inclusion of 21st century skills in the content of science textbooks at the basic education stage in Jordan [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Al Al-Bayt University.

2. Amin, B. D., & Mahmud, A. (2016). The development of physics learning instrument based on hypermedia and its influence on the student problem solving skill. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(6), 22-28.

3. Amin, B., Haris, A., & Swandi, A. (2017). Implementation of physics learning instrument based on hypermedia to increase science process skill. Chair Person, 175.

4. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 523. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.523

5. Barry, C., & Lang, M. (2001). Contrasting approaches: A study of traditional and multimedia information systems development in Ireland. Proceedings of Irish Academy of Management Annual Conference.

6. Brooks, R. M. (1993). Principles for effective hypermedia design. Technical Communication, 422-428.

7. BUNGA, D. A., HARIS, A., & SWANDI, A. (2019). IMPLEMEN A ION OF PH SICS LEARNING BASED ON H PERMEDIA O ENHANCE S UDEN ʼS PROBLEM SOLVING SKILL. International

ournal of eaching and Education, 7(2), 1-11.

8. Candan, A., Türkmen, L., & Çardak, O. (2006). The effects of concept mapping on primary school students’ understanding of the concepts of force and motion. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 3(1), 28.

9. Çebi, A., & Güyer, T. (2019). Modeling of relationships between students’ navigational behavior and problems in hypermedia learning system: The moderating role of working memory capacity. Interactive Learning Environments. http://doi.org/0.1080/10494820.2019.1674881

10. Chen, S. (2002). A cognitive model for non–linear learning in hypermedia programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 449-460. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00281

11. Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. Computer, 2(9), 17-41.

12. Cueli, M., González-Castro, P., Krawec, J., Núñez, J. C., & González-Pienda, J. A. (2016). Hipatia: A hypermedia learning environment in mathematics. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 32(1), 98-105.

13. Elissavet, G., & Economides, A. A. (2003). An evaluation instrument for hypermedia courseware. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 31-44.

14. Eveland, W. P., & Dunwoody, S. (1999). Using hypermedia research to advance the study of learning on the world wide web. Research Monograph.

15. Fraase, M. (1991). Farallon’s media tracks: The ultimate training tool. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

16. Garzotto, F., Retalis, S., Tzanavari, A., & Cantoni, I. (2004). From pedagogical paradigms to hypermedia design patterns: Where to start? EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, 4221-4226.

17. Hicks, T. (2019). Hypertext and hypermedia writing. The International Encyclopedia of Media Literacy, 1-

9. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0088

18. Isakowitz, T., Stohr, E. A., & Balasubramanian, P. (1995). RMM: A methodology for structured hypermedia design. Communications of the ACM, 38(8), 34-44.

19. Kommers, P. A., Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (Eds.). (1996). Hypermedia learning environments: Instructional design and integration. Psychology Press.

20. Kumar, M. (2008). Integrating hypermedia technology for interactive learning: A case study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 35(2), 175-184.

21. Lang, M. (2002). Hypermedia systems development: Do we really need new methods? Proceedings of the Informing Science+ IT Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.28945/2520

22. Lee, H., Lee, C., & Yoo, C. (1999). A scenario-based object-oriented hypermedia design methodology.

Information & Management, 36(3), 121-138.

23. Liu, M., Williams, D., & Pedersen, S. (2002). Alien rescue: A problem-based hypermedia learning environment for middle school science. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 30(3), 255-270. http://doi.org/10.2190/X531-D6KE-NXVY-N6RE

24. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in science. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results

25. Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American psychologist, 63(8), 760. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.63.8.760.

26. Mirzaeifard, S. (2018). Hypermedia design. The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1-6. http://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0413

27. Moos, D. C. (2014). Setting the stage for the metacognition during hypermedia learning: What motivation constructs matter? Computers and Education, 70, 128-137. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.014

28. Oliveira, L. L. D., Mendes, I. C., Balsells, M. M. D., Bernardo, E. B. R., Castro, R. C. M. B., Aquino, P.

D. S., & Damasceno, A. K. D. C. (2019). Educational hypermedia in nursing assistance at birth: Building

and validation of content and appearance. Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 72(6), 1471-1478. http://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167/2018-0163

29. Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (1995). Developing effective hypermedia instructional materials. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 11(2).

30. Olson, J. (Ed.). (2017). Innovation in the science curriculum. Routledge.

31. Pedersen, S., & Williams, D. (2004). A comparison of assessment practices and their effects on learning and motivation in a student-centered learning environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(3), 283-306.

32. Pedersen, S., Liu, M., & Williams, D. (2002). Alien Rescue: Designing for student-centered learning. Educational Technology, 42(5), 11-14.

33. Ruttun, R. (2009). The effects of visual elements and cognitive styles on students’ learning in hypermedia environment. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 49, 963-971.

34. Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., Marticorena-Sánchez, R., Díez-Pastor, J. F., & García-Osorio, C. I. (2019). Does the use of learning management systems with hypermedia mean improved student learning outcomes? Frontiers in Psychology, 10. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00088

35. Salih, M., Mai, M. Y., & Al Shibli, A. (2016). Students’ motivation toward science learning in secondary schools in Oman and Malaysia: A comparative study. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 6(1), 16-24.

36. Schwabe, D., & Rossi, G. (1995). The object-oriented hypermedia design model. Communications of the ACM, 38(8), 45-48.

37. Schwabe, D., Rossi, G., & Barbosa, S. D. (1996). Systematic hypermedia application design with OOHDM. Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Hypertext.

38. Shapiro, A. M. (2008). Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(1), 29-44. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9063-4

39. Singh, A., & Kalyuga, S. (2016). Enhancing the effectiveness of educational hypermedia: A cognitive load approach. In F. Neto, R. de Souza, & A. Gomes (Eds.), Handbook of research on 3-D virtual environments and hypermedia for ubiquitous learning (pp. 387-409). IGI Global. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0125-1.ch016

40. Tahmasebi, M., Fotouhi, F., & Esmaeili, M. (2019). Hybrid adaptive educational hypermedia recommender accommodating user’s learning style and web page features. Journal of AI and Data Mining, 7(2), 225-238.

41. Theng, Y. L. (1999). Better design and development of hypermedia materials for teaching and learning on the internet. Internet-based Teaching and Learning, 231-236.

42. Ubaidah, U. (2019). Hypermedia development as self-regulated learning resources for high school English debating training. Business Economic, Communication, and Social Sciences Journal, 1(1), 39-45.

43. Vania, P. F., Setiawan, W., & Wijaya, A. F. C. (2018). Edmodo as web-based learning to improve students’ cognitive and motivation in learning, thermal physics. Journal of Science Learning, 1(3), 110-115. http://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v1i3.11796.

44. Vieira, A. I. D. C. (2016). Promoting self-regulation and mathematics achievement: The role of a hypermedia application, Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Minho Escola de Psicologia.

45. Yamat, H., Ismail, A., & Shah, A. A. (2012). Developing hypermedia reading courseware for English for specific purposes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4874-4879. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.352

46. Yang, C. S., & Moore, D. M. (1995). Designing hypermedia systems for instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 24(1), 3-30.

47. Yen, H., Tuan, H., & Liao, C. (2011). Investigating the influence of motivation on students’ conceptual learning outcomes in web-based vs. classroom-based science teaching contexts. Res Sci Educ, 41, 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9161-x

48. Zumbach, J., & Mohraz, M. (2008). Cognitive load in hypermedia reading comprehension: Influence of text type and linearity. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 875-887. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.02.015.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

Ajlouni, A. O., & Jaradat, S. A. (2020). Teaching Science with Technology: A Pedagogical Hypermedia for the Science Discipline. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 13900-13914. https://doi.org/10.61841/y4ktae92