The Meaning of Verb Washin Javanese Nganjuk: A Natural Semantic Metalanguage Approach

Authors

  • Ita Fitriana Department of Japanese, Jenderal Soedirman University, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/5t1n2k40

Keywords:

Natural Semantic Metalanguage, slight and overt different, semantic fields

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze and describe application of Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) theory to verb “wash” in Javanese, Nganjuk dialect. Main theory of this research in NSM theory to analyze the data qualitatively through equivalent and sharing methods. Natural Semantic Metalanguage recognizes the principle that natural state of a language is to maintain form for one meaning and one meaning for one form. There are 2 data sources to complete this research: (1) primary data as verbal data and written data of research topic. Observation and interview are the methods of collecting data. Data analysis results are presented in both formal and informal methods. Results obtained show that verb “wash”/ ngumbah in Javanese consists of lexicons raup, wisuh, umbah-umbah, korah-korah, ngguyang, jamas, ngorek, ados, and wudhu. Those are having the same meaning, yet each lexicon has its own unique key feature to distinguish one to another.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Andarini, Dini, Singgih Sugiarto, Muhamad Imam Ghozali, Dalan Mehuli, and Thomas J. Conners. 2007. ‘Javanese Dialect Mapping’. MPI EVA Jakarta Field Station. Retrieved 8 May 2020 (http://jakarta.shh.mpg.de/javanese_dialectology.php).

2. Borjesson, Kristin. 2014. The Semantics - Pragmatics Controversy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.

3. Bungin, Burhan. 2017. Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Kencana.

4. Creswell, John W. 2019. Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan Campuran. 4th ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

5. Fromkin, Victoria, Robert Rodman, and Nina Hyams. 2018. An Introduction to Language. 11th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning.

6. Goddard, Cliff. 2008. Cross-Linguistic Semantics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

7. Goddard, Cliff. 2010. ‘The Natural Semantic Metalanguage Approach’. Pp. 459–84 in The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

8. Goddard, Cliff. 2011. Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. edited by G. Booij. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

9. Hayat, Nahrul. 2020. ‘COVID-19: Apa Yang Membuat Kegagalan Komunikasi Pemerintah?’ Www.Remotivi.or.Id. Retrieved 25 May 2020 (https://www.remotivi.or.id/amatan/586/covid-19-apa-yang-membuat-kegagalan-komunikasi-pemerintah).

10. Lanin, Ivan. 2018. Xenoglosofilia: Kenapa Harus Nginggris? 2nd ed. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara.

11. Peeters, Bert. 2006. Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar: Empirical Evidence from the Romance Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

12. Rabiah, Sitti. 2018. ‘Language as a Tool for Communication and Cultural Reality Discloser’. INA-Rxiv.

13. Saddhono, K, et al. 2019. Learning Vocabularies Using Multimedia-Based Teaching Indonesian to Speakers of Other Languages (TISOL). Journal of Physics Conference Series. Vol 1339 (1), 012087.

14. Shaules, Joseph. 2019. Language, Culture, and the Embodied Mind A Developmental Model of Linguaculture Learning. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

15. Sulaiman, M. Zain, and Rita Wilson. 2019. Translation and Tourism Strategies for Effective Cross-Cultural Promotion. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

16. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

17. Mulyawan, I. W. (2019). Impact of tourism on vernacular outdoor signs in Ubud, Bali, Indonesia. ISVS E-Journal, 9(1), 42-49

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

Fitriana, I. (2020). The Meaning of Verb Washin Javanese Nganjuk: A Natural Semantic Metalanguage Approach. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 13809-13816. https://doi.org/10.61841/5t1n2k40