ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF WORKLOADS IN CLOUD ENVIRONMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/w34mn798Keywords:
Workload, prediction, cloud, performanceAbstract
Cloud computing technologies over the years have helped meet the changing needs for resources and computing capabilities of different organizations globally. By migration of workloads to cloud platform, (public, private or hybrid) there have been significant increase in Data Analytics applications to gain valuable insights from data. The rising amounts of workload have led to the necessity of predicting the optimal choice of platform for performing analytics in cloud to achieve better results. The increases in popularity of containers have made them an efficient choice for computing and prediction over traditional Virtual machines. This paper tries to analyse the different workloads and the types of model to predict them with the prospect of running workloads in a containerised environment.
Downloads
References
1. AL-Faifi, Abdullah & Song, Biao & Hassan, Mohammad & Alamri, Atif & Gumaei, Abdu. (2018). Performance prediction model for cloud service selection from smart data. Future Generation Computer Systems.10.1016/j.future.2018.03.015.
2. Yazhou Hu, Bo Deng, Fuyang Peng and Dongxia Wang, "Workload prediction for cloud computing elasticity mechanism," 2016 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data
Analysis (ICCCBDA), Chengdu, 2016, pp. 244249
3. F. J. Baldan, S. Ramirez-Gallego, C. Bergmeir, F. Herrera and J. M.BenitezSanchez, "A Forecasting Methodology for Workload Forecasting in CloudSystems," in IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing
4. A. Khan, X. Yan, S. Tao and N. Anerousis, "Workload characterization and prediction in the cloud: A multiple time series approach," 2012 IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium, Maui, HI, 2012, pp. 1287-1294.
5. R. N. Calheiros, E. Masoumi, R. Ranjan and R. Buyya, "Workload Prediction Using ARIMA Model and Its Impact on Cloud Applications’ QoS," in IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 449-458, 1 Oct.-Dec. 2015.
6. Q. Fan and N. Ansari, "Application Aware Workload Allocation for EdgeComputing-Based IoT," in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp.2146-2153, June 2018.
7. J. Panneerselvam, L. Liu, N. Antonopoulos and Y. Bo, "Workload Analysis for theScope of User Demand Prediction Model Evaluations in Cloud Environments,"2014 IEEE/ACM 7th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, London, 2014, pp. 883-889.
8. W. Tang et al., "Workload characterization for MG-RAST metagenomic data analytics service in the cloud," 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Washington, DC, 2014,
pp. 56-63
9. H. Zhang, G. Jiang, K. Yoshihira and H. Chen, "Proactive Workload Management in Hybrid Cloud Computing," in IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 90-100, March 2014Service", 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, International Conference on, vol. , no., pp. 98103, Nov., 2017.
10. C. Wang, W. Hung and C. Yang, "A prediction based energy conserving resources allocation scheme for cloud computing," 2014 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GrC), Noboribetsu, 2014, pp. 320-324.
11. S. Vakilinia, M. Cheriet and J. Rajkumar, "Dynamic resource allocation of smart home workloads in the cloud," 2016 12th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM), Montreal, QC, 2016, pp. 367-370.
12. A. Adegboyega, "Time-series models for cloud workload prediction: A comparison," 2017 IFIP/IEEE Symposium on Integrated Network and Service Management (IM), Lisbon, 2017, pp. 298-307.
13. A. K. Mishra, J. L. Hellerstein, W. Cirne, and C. R. Das, “Towards characterizing cloud backend workloads: Insights from google computer clusters,” ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 34–41,2010.
14. E. Caron, F. Desprez, and A. Muresan, “Forecasting for grid and cloud computing on-demand resources based on pattern matching,” in Proc. 2nd IEEE Int. Conf. Cloud Comput. Technol. Sci., Dec. 2010, pp. 456–463.
15. G. E. P. Box,, G. M. Jenkins, and G. C. Reinsel, Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2008
16. Hoffinann G, Trivedi K S, Malek M. A best practice guide to resource predicting for computing systems[J]. Reliability, IEEE Transactions on, 2007,56(4): 615-628.
17. Islam S, Keung J, Lee K, et al. Empirical prediction models for adaptive resource provisioning
in the cloud. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2012,28(1): 155-162.
18. Jiang Y, Perng C, Li T, et al. Asap: A self-adaptive prediction system for instant cloud resource demand provisioning, Data Mining (ICDM), 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on. IEEE, 2011: 1104-1109
19. Jiang Y, Perng C, Li T, et al. Asap: A self-adaptive prediction system for instant cloud resource demand provisioning, Data Mining (ICDM), 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on. IEEE, 2011: 1104-1109.
20. M. Calzarossa and G. Serazzi, “Workload characterization: A survey,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 1136–1150, 1993.A. B. Downey and D. G. Feitelson, “The elusive goal of workload characterization,” ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 14–29, 1999.
21. M. Calzarossa and G. Serazzi, “Workload characterization: A survey,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 81, no. 8, pp. 1136–1150, 1993.
22. N. Roy, A. Dubey, and A. Gokhale, “Efficient autoscaling in the cloud using predictive models for workload forecasting,” in Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Cloud Comput., Jul. 2011, pp. 500–507.
23. Q. Zhu and G. Agrawal, “Resource provisioning with budget constraints for adaptive in cloud.” International Journal of Grid and Utility Computing, vol 7, no.1, pp1221,2016.
24. R. Hyndman and G. Athanasopoulos, “Forecasting: Principles and practice,2013. [Online]. Available: http://otexts.org/fpp/
25. Reig G, Guitart J. On the anticipation of resource demands to fulfill the qos of saas web applications, Proceedings of the 2012 ACM/IEEE 13th International Conference on Grid Computing. IEEE Computer Society, 2012: 147-154.
26. Roy N, Dubey A, Gokhale A. Efficient autoscaling in the cloud using predictive models for workload predicting, Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2011: 500507.
27. Roy N, Dubey A, Gokhale A. Efficient autoscaling in the cloud using predictive models for workload predicting, Cloud Computing (CLOUD), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2011: 500507.
28. S. Islam, J. Keung, K. Lee, and A. Liu, “Empirical prediction models for adaptive resource provisioning in the Cloud,” Future Gener. Comput. Syst., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 155–162, 2012.
29. S. K. Sahi and V. S. Dhaka, "A survey paper on workload prediction requirements of cloud computing," 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, 2016, pp. 254-258.
30. V. G. Tran, V. Debusschere, and S. Bacha, “Hourly server workload forecasting up to 168 hours ahead using seasonal ARIMA model,” in Proc. 13th Int. Conf. Ind. Technol., Mar. 2012, pp. 1127–1131.
31. Xu W, Zhu X, Singhal S, et al. Predictive control for dynamic resource allocation in enterprise data centers, Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2006. NOMS 2006. 10th IEEE/IFIP. IEEE, 2006: 115-12
32. Y. Chen, A. Ganapathi, R. Griffith, and R. Katz, “Towards understanding cloud performance tradeoffs using statistical workload analysis and replay,” EECS, UC Berkeley, Tech. Rep., 2010.
33. P. Akilandeswari, H.Srimathi Survey and Analysis on Task Scheduling in Cloud Environment, Indian
Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 9(37), 2016.
34. Y. Wang, R. Yang, T. Wo, W. Jiang, and C. Hu, “Improving utilization through dynamic VM resource allocation in hybrid cloud environment,” in Proc. 20th IEEE Int. Conf. Parallel Distrib. Syst. (ICPADS), Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2014, pp. 241–248
35. Z. Shen, S. Subbiah, X. Gu, and J. Wilkes, “CloudScale: elastic resource scaling for multi-tenant cloud systems,” in Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, ser. SOCC ’11, 2011,
pp. 5:1–5:14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
