Prostate malignant growth Detection utilizing Deep convolutional neural systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/tjphf513Keywords:
Prostate cancer disease, Image Processing, ResNet, deep learning pipeline, DCNN (Deep Convolutional Neural Network)Abstract
Prostate disease is one of the most well-known types of malignancy and the third driving reason for malignant growth passing in North America. As a coordinated piece of PC supported identification (CAD) devices, dispersion weighted attractive reverberation imaging (DWi) has been seriously read for exact discovery of prostate disease. With profound convolutional neural systems (CNNs) critical accomplishment in PC vision errands, for example, object identification and division, diverse CNN structures are progressively explored in clinical imaging research network as promising answers for planning increasingly exact cAD devices for disease discovery. right now, created and actualized a mechanized CNN-based pipeline for recognition of clinically noteworthy prostate malignant growth (PCa) for a given pivotal DWI picture and for every patient. DWI pictures of 427 patients were utilized as the dataset, which contained 175 patients with PCa and 252 patients without PCa. To gauge the presentation of the proposed pipeline, a test set of 108 (out of 427) patients were saved and not utilized in the preparation stage. The proposed pipeline accomplished region under the recipient working trademark bend (AUC) of 0.87 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.84–0.90) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76–0.91) at cut level and patient level, separately.
Downloads
References
1. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians 67, 7–30 (2017).
2. Hari Krishna, Timmana, Detection of mammographic cancer using support vector machine and deep neural network. Journal of mechanics of continua and mathematical sciences 2019, vol.8 doi: 14. 10.26782/jmcms.2019.12.00013.
3. Sandhu, G. S. & Andriole, G. L. Overdiagnosis of prostate cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs 2012, 146–151 (2012).
4. Sonn, G.A.et al. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging interpretation varies substantially across radiologists. Eur. urology focus (2017).
5. Hassanzadeh, E.et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PIRADS v2): A pictorial review. Abdom Radiol 42, 278–289 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2014.08.005. (2017).
6. Rosenkrantz, A. B. et al. Interobserver reproducibility of the pi-rads version 2 lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology 280, 793–804 (2016).
7. Nasrabadi, N. M. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Journal of electronic imaging 16, 049901 (2007).
8. Goldberg, D. E. & Holland, J. H. Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Machine learning 3, 95–99 (1988).
9. Michalski, R. S., Carbonell, J. G. & Mitchell, T. M. Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
10. Cameron, A., Khalvati, F., Haider, M. A. & Wong, A. Maps: a quantitative radiomics approach for prostate cancer detection. IEEE Transactions on Biomed. Eng. 63, 1145–1156 (2016).
11. Litjens, G., Debats, O., Barentsz, J., Karssemeijer, N. & Huisman, H. Computer-aided detection of prostate cancer in mri. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 33, 1083–1092 (2014).
12. Wang, S., Burtt, K., Turkbey, B., Choyke, P. & Summers, R.M.Computer aided-diagnosis of prostate cancer on multiparametric mri: a technical review of current research. BioMed research international 2014 (2014).
13. Fehr, D. et al. Automatic classification of prostate cancer gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images. Proc. of the Natl. Acad. of Sci. 112, E6265–E6273 (2015).
14. Erickson, B. J., Korfiatis, P., Akkus, Z. & Kline, T. L. Machine learning for medical imaging. Radiographics 37, 505–515 (2017).
15. Orru, G., Pettersson-Yeo, W., Marquand, A. F., Sartori, G. & Mechelli, A. Using support vector machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review. Neurosci. & Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1140–1152 (2012).
16. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Hinton, G.E. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 1097– 1105 (2012).
17. Long, J., Shelhamer, E. & Darrell, T.Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 3431– 3440 (2015).
18. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 770– 778 (2016).
19. Ioffe, S. & Szegedy, C. Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.03167 (2015).
20. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. nature 521, 436 (2015).
21. Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 (2014).
22. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. nature 521, 436 (2015).
23. Tsehay, Y.et al. Biopsy-guided learning with deep convolutional neural networks for prostate cancer detection on multiparametric mri. In Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2017), 2017 IEEE 14th International Symposium on, 642– 645 (IEEE, 2017).
24. Le, M. H. et al. Automated diagnosis of prostate cancer in multi-parametric mri based on multimodal convolutional neural networks. Phy. in Medicine & Bio. 62, 6497 (2017).
25. Liu, S., Zheng, H., Feng, Y. & Li, W. Prostate cancer diagnosis using deep learning with 3d multiparametric mri. In Medical Imaging 2017: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, vol. 10134, 1013428 (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2017).
26. Armato, S. G., Petrick, N. A. & Drukker, K.Prostatex: Prostate mr classification challenge (conference presentation). Proceedings of the SPIE, Volume 10134, id. 101344G 1 pp.(2017).134 (2017).
27. Mehrtash, A.et al. Classification of clinical significance of mri prostate findings using 3d convolutional neural networks. In Medical Imaging 2017: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, vol. 10134, 101342A (International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2017).
28. Ishioka, J. et al. Mp20-10 deep learning with a convolutional neural network algorithm for fully automated detection of prostate cancer using pre-biopsy mri. The Journal of Urology 199, e256 (2018).
29. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention, 234– 241 (Springer, 2015).
30. Wang, X. et al. Searching for prostate cancer by fully automated magnetic resonance imaging classification: deep learning versus non-deep learning. Sci. reports 7, 15415 (2017).
31. Breiman, L. Random forests. Machine learning 45, 5–32 (2001).
32. Nguyen, C., Wang, Y. & Nguyen, H. N. Random forest classifier combined with feature selection for breast cancer diagnosis and prognostic. J. of Biomed. Sci. and Eng. 6, 551 (2013).
33. Padhani, A. R. et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11, 102–125 (2009).
34. Glaister, J., Cameron, A., Wong, A. & Haider, M.A. Quantitative investigative analysis of tumour separability in the prostate gland using ultra-high b-value computed diffusion imaging. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE, 420– 423 (IEEE, 2012).
35. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Identity mappings in deep residual networks. In European conference on computer vision, 630– 645 (Springer, 2016).
36. Bottou, L. Large-scale machine learning with stochastic gradient descent. In Proceedings of COMPSTAT’2010, 177– 186 (Springer, 2010).
37. De Boer, P.-T., Kroese, D. P., Mannor, S. & Rubinstein, R. Y. A tutorial on the cross-entropy method. Annals of operations research 134, 19–67 (2005).
38. Wolpert, D. H. Stacked generalization. Neural networks 5, 241–259 (1992).
39. Vapnik, V.The nature of statistical learning theory (Springer science and business media, 2013).
40. Saeys, Y., Inza, I. & Larrañaga, P. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. bioinformatics 23, 2507–2517 (2007).
41. Kim, H.-Y. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative dentistry & endodontics 38, 52–54 (2013).
42. Hanley, J. A. & McNeil, B. J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (roc) curve. Radiology 143, 29–36 (1982).
43. Khalvati, F., Wong, A. & Haider, M. A. Automated prostate cancer detection via comprehensive multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging texture feature models. BMC medical imaging 15, 27 (2015).
44. Khalvati, F. et al. Mpcad: a multi-scale radiomics-driven framework for automated prostate cancer localization and detection. BMC medical imaging 18, 16 (2018).
45. Brinkmann, R.The art and science of digital compositing: Techniques for visual effects, animation and motion graphics (Morgan Kaufmann, 2008).
46. Mikolov, T., Karafiát, M., Burget, L., Černocky, J. & Khudanpur, S. Recurrent neural network based language model. In Eleventh annual conference of the international speech communication association (2010).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
