Defining components of social interaction for Indian public open space

Authors

  • Adiba Shafique Research student, Faculty of Built Environment & Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor, 81310, Malaysia Author
  • Roshida Abdul Majid Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru-81310, Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/xj9d0t93

Keywords:

Social interaction, Public Open Space, Indian context

Abstract

Improving public open space is becoming one of the prerequisites for effective future of public life in cities. The potential of social interaction attributes, which are one of the predominant factors of public open space, is often neglected in India. The factors of social interaction varies according to the context due to variation in culture, demography, social norms, etc. This study examines the factors of social interaction of Public open space in Indian context for making successful Indian public open space. The research has been twofold, first, literature review has been accomplished through which factors of social interaction has been derived. Based on obtained factors, questionnaire survey has been performed over three selected sites of South Delhi. In second section, data screening has been done, followed by the Cronbach’s alpha for checking reliability of each item and exploratory factor analysis using IBM SPSS plus confirmatory factor analysis using IBM Amos for confirming the validity of data. In conclusion, considering the listed factors that are users need, user behaviour and social activity are the significant components of social interaction for promoting effective Public open space in Indian context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abbasia, A., Alalouchb, C., & Bramleyc, G. (2016). Open space quality in deprived urban areas: user perspective and use pattern. jounal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 194-205.

2. Alexander, C. (1977). A Pattern Language. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.

4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.

5. Bahmanyar, A., & Cheshmehghassabani, M. (2017). Investigating the Effective Physical Factors on Promoting Social Interactions in Cultural Complexes. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 7(3), 47-54.

6. Bear, A. R., & Higgins, C. (2002). Environmental Planning for Land Development: An Instruction for Sustainable Local Planning and Design. Tehran: Tehran University Press.

7. Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D., & Baum, A. S. (1996). Environmental Psychology (4th ed.). Sydney: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

8. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sage Publications, 21(2), 230-258.

9. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (3rd ed.). Nw York / East Sussex: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

10. Chen, C.-W., Aztiria, A., Allouch, S. B., & Aghajan, H. (2011). Understanding the Influence of Social Interactions on Individual’s Behavior Pattern in a Work Environment. In A. A. Salah & B. Lepri (Eds.), Human Behaviour Understandings (Vol. 7065, pp. 146-157). Heidelberg: Springer, Berlin.

11. Child, D. (1990). The essentials of factor analysis (2nd ed.). London: Cassel Educational Limited.

12. Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika(16), 297-334.

13. Daneshpour, A., & Charkhchian, M. (2007). Public Spaces and Factors Affecting Collective Life. Bagh-e Nazar, 4(7), 19-28.

14. French, J. S. (1978). Urban Space: A Brief History of the City Square. Iowa: Kendall Hunt.

15. Gehl, J. (1996). Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Copenhagen: Danish Architectural Press and the Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, School of Architecture.

16. Goffman, E. (1963). Behavior in Public Place. New York: The free press.

17. Hair., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.

18. Hajmirsadeghi, R. S., Shamsuddin, S., Lamit, H. B., & Foroughi, A. (2013). Design’s factors influencing social interaction in public squares. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, vol.2(4), 5556-5564.

19. harun, N. z., & said, I. (2009). The changing roles of public spaces in Malaysia. Habitat Magazine.

20. Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). the social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

21. Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T., Schriesheim, C., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., & Williams, L. J. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 667-683.

22. Israel, G. D. (1992). Determining Sample Size. Retrieved from

23. Jacobs, J. (1961). Death and life of great american cities. New York: Vintage Books.

24. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least square methods. Mooresville, Ind: Scientific Software.

25. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. Cambridge.: Cambridge University Press.

26. Kim, J., & Kaplan, R. (2004). Physical and psychological factors in sense of community: New urbanist Kentlands and nearby orchard village. Journal of Environment and Behavior, 36(3), 313-340.

27. Kurniasanti, R. P., Darjosanjoto, E. T. S., & Faqih, M. (2018). Understanding the Relationship between Urban Morphology and Behavior Pattern (Case Study : Kampung Arab Malang, Indonesia). International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 8(7), 168- 172.

28. Lang, J. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

29. Lei, P. W., & Wu, Q. (2007). Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling : Issues and Practical Considerations. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 26(3), 33-43.

30. Lewis, P. H. J. (1996). Tomorrow by Design: A Regional Design Process for Sustainability. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

31. Ludvigsen, M. (2006). Designing for Social Use in Public Places – a Conceptual Framework of Social Interaction. Paper presented at the 6th conference on designing interactive systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques.

32. Lynch, K. (1981). The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press.

33. M.Speller, G. (2006). A Place of my Own. Green Places(26), 18-20.

34. Maartje van Lieshout, & Aarts, N. (2008). Youth and Immigrants' Perspectives on Public Spaces. Journal of space and culture, 11(4), 497-513.

35. Matthew Carmona, Hammond, L., & Magalhães, C. d. (2008). Public space : the management dimension / Matthew Carmona, Claudio de Magalhães, Leo Hammond. London: Routledge.

36. Mehan, A. (2016). Public squares and thier potential for social interactions: A case study of historical public squares in Tehran. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 10(2), 489-494.

37. Rafieian, M., & Zahra, K. (2009). Investigating the Indicators and Criteria Affecting Citizens' Satisfactions of Urban Public Spaces. Journal of Rahbord, 18(53), 227-248.

38. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-338.

39. Thwaites, K. (2005). Restorative Urban Open Space: exploring the spatial configuration of human emotional fulfillment in urban open space. Landscape research, 30(4), 525-547.

40. Veitch, R., & Arkkelin, D. (1995). Environmental Psychology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

41. Vosoughi, M. (2009). The Study of Social Trust and Effective Factors in Khalkhal City. Social Sciences Research Journal, 3(3), 133-154.

42. Whyte, W. H. (1980). The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. New York: Project for PublicSpaces.

43. Williams, J. (2005). Designing Neighbourhoods for Social Interaction: The Case of Cohousing. journal of Urban Design, 10(2), 195-227.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

Shafique , A., & Abdul Majid, R. (2020). Defining components of social interaction for Indian public open space. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 12105-12119. https://doi.org/10.61841/xj9d0t93