The impact of 14th Malaysian General Election on Bursa Malaysia by using a complex network approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/dyfa9d57Keywords:
Network, Bursa Malaysia, Minimal Spanning Tree, Centrality MeasuresAbstract
A complex system such as a financial market can be visualized in the form of a network. For instance, a network is used to exhibits the interconnection between stocks that are traded in the market. In addition, it shows many important embedded information in a network such as structural changes that are affected from any events. Even though, the applications of a complex network has been used to investigate the behaviour of Bursa Malaysia, far too little attention has been paid to the effect of political event towards Malaysian financial market. Thus, this study concentrates the effect of 14th Malaysian General Election towards Bursa Malaysia. The first objective is to construct a financial network of Bursa Malaysia and the second objective is to examine the importance of the stocks on the financial network. The data used are the shariah-compliant stocks listed on Shariah Advisory Council (SAC). The duration of the study is divided into two periods which are the six months before and after the general election. The minimal spanning tree is used to construct a network and centrality measures are used to examine the role of a stock in a network. The empirical findings revealed and shed light on the impact of the 14th Malaysian General Election on shariah-compliant securities.
Downloads
References
1. Aswani, J. (2017). Impact of global financial crisis on network of Asian stock markets. Algorithmic Finance, 6, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.3233/AF-170192
2. Bahaludin, H., Abdullah, M. H., Siew, L. W., & Hoe, L. W. (2019). The Investigation on the Impact of Financial Crisis on Bursa Malaysia Using Minimal Spanning Tree. Mathematics and Statistics, 7(4A), 1–
8. https://doi.org/10.13189/ms.2019.070701
3. Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and Centrality : A Family of Measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182.
4. Coletti, P., & Murgia, M. (2016). The Network of the Italian Stock Market during the 2008-2011 Financial Crises. Algorithmic Finance, 5(3–4), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.3233/AF-160177
5. Djauhari, M. A., & Gan, S. L. (2013). Minimal spanning tree problem in stock networks analysis: An efficient algorithm. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 392(9), 2226–2234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2012.12.032
6. Djauhari, M. A., & Gan, S. L. (2014a). Bursa Malaysia Stocks Market Analysis : A Review. ASM Science Journal, 8(2), 150–158.
7. Djauhari, M. A., & Gan, S. L. (2014b). Optimality problem of network topology in stocks market analysis. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 419(2015), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.09.060
8. Freeman, L. C. (1977). A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033543
9. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification. Social Networks, 1(1968), 215–239.
10. Gan, S. L., & Djauhari, M. A. (2012). Stock Network Analysis in Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental & Applied Sciences, 8(2), 60–66.
11. Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal Component Analysis. Springer Series in Statistics (Second Edi, Vol. 98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/b98835
12. Kruskal, J. (1956). On the Shortest Spanning Subtree of a Graph and the Traveling Salesman Problem. In
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (pp. 48–50). American Mathemtical Society.
13. Lee, J. W., & Nobi, A. (2018). State and Network Structures of Stock Markets Around the Global Financial Crisis. Computational Economics, 51(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-017-9672-x
14. Li, Y., Jiang, X., Tian, Y., Li, S., & Zheng, B. (2018). Portfolio optimization based on network topology. Physica A. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.10.014
15. Lim, S. Y., Salleh, R. M., & Asrah, N. M. (2018). Multidimensional Minimal Spanning Tree : The Bursa Malaysia. Journal of Science and Technology, 10(2), 136–143.
16. Mahamood, F. N. A., Bahaludin, H., & Abdullah, M. H. (2019). A Network Analysis of Shariah-Compliant Stocks across Global Financial Crisis : A Case of Malaysia. Modern Applied Science, 13(7), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v13n7p80
17. Majapa, M., & Gossel, S. J. (2016). Topology of the South African stock market network across the 2008 financial crisis. Physica A, 445, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.10.108
18. Malkevitch, J. (2012). Trees : A Mathematical Tool for All Seasons. American Mathematical Society, Feature Column, 1–16.
19. Mantegna, R. N. (1999). Hierarchical structure in financial markets. European Physical Journal B, 11(1), 193–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050929
20. Memon, B. A., & Yao, H. (2019). Structural Change and Dynamics of Pakistan Stock Market During Crisis: A Complex Network Perspective. Entropy, 21(3), 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21030248
21. Memon, B. A., Yao, H., & Tahir, R. (2020). General election effect on the network topology of Pakistan ’ s stock market : network-based study of a political event. Financial Innovation, 6(2), 1–14.
22. Nesetril, J. (1997). A Few Remarks on the History of MST-Problem. Archivum Mathematicum, 33(1–2), 15–22.
23. Pasini, G. (2017). Principal Component Analysis for Stock Portfolio Management. International Journal of Pure and Apllied Mathematics, 115(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v115i1.12
24. Peralta, G., & Zareei, A. (2016). A Network Approach to Portfolio Selection. Journal of Empirical Finance, 38, 157–180.
25. Pozzi, F., Di Matteo, T., & Aste, T. (2013). Spread of risk across financial markets: Better to invest in the peripheries. Scientific Reports, 3, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01665
26. Sharif, S., & Djauhari, M. A. (2012). A Proposed Centrality Measure: The Case of Stocks Traded at Bursa Malaysia. Modern Applied Science, 6(10), p62. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v6n10p62
27. Tabak, B. M., Serra, T. R., & Cajueiro, D. O. (2010). Topological properties of stock market networks : The case of Brazil. Physica A, 389(16), 3240–3249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2010.04.002
28. Yao, H., & Memon, B. A. (2019). Network topology of FTSE 100 Index companies: From the perspective of Brexit. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 523, 1248–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.106
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
