Synchronizing the Regional Boundary Dispute Resolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/arp78x89Keywords:
The Regional Boundaries, Conflicts, Synchronizing LawsAbstract
The issue of regional boundaries does not become an absolute requirement that must be met before being legalized as a new autonomous region. Therefore, the map made in the appendix to the Law on Regional Formation (UUPD) also means merely a clue to the location of the region that the territory exists among other regions, or is just a differentiator between one region and another, no more. This problem is one of the triggers for conflict with regional boundaries. The purpose of this study is to synchronize Law No. 22 of 1999, Law No. 32 of 2004 as well as Law No. 23 of 2014) and their derivative laws, particular the Ministry of Internal Affairs Decree (Permendagri) No. 1 of 2006 which has been replaced by Permendagri No. 76 of 2012, then replaced again with Permendagri No. 141 of 2017 concerning Affirmation of Regional Boundaries. Those laws and Permendagri are exercised in the West Sulawesi as the site of the study. The results of the study show that the synchronization of the regional boundaries must be done by adoption the bottom-up concept. In the context of the Province of West Sulawesi, the delimitation stage of the area boundaries has not been followed by the definition of a clear point and boundary line in the map of Law No. 26 of 2004.
Downloads
References
1. Antaranews. (2007). “11 Provinsi Selesaikan Batas Daerah”. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/86356/11-provinsi-selesaikan-batas-daerah.
2. Arifin, S. (2016). Penyelesaian Sengketa Batas Daerah Menggunakan Pendekatan Regulasi. Jurnal Hukum IUS QULA IUSTUM, 23(3): 439- 460.
3. Batubara, H. (2014). Perselisihan Batas Daerah, Konflik Setengah Hati. Bandung: Wilayahperbatasan.com.
4. Batubara, H. (2015). “Masalah Penyelesaian Sengketa Batas Antar Daerah”. https://www.kompasiana.com/harmenbatubara/550e10aca33311a42dba7f1c/masalah-penyelesaian-sengketa-batas-antar-daerah.
5. Batubara, H. (2018). “Percepatan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Batas Antar Daerah”. http://www.wilayahperbatasan.com/percepatan-penyelesaian-perselisihan-batas-antar-daerah/
6. CNN Indonesia. (2017). “Kemendagri Pangkas Batas Daerah Bermasalah”. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20171010004939-20-247295/kemendagri-pangkas-batas-daerah-bermasalah.
7. Endarto. (2014). Evaluasi Pemekaran Daerah di Era Reformasi. Jurnal Lingkar Widyaiswara, 1(4): 60-65.
8. Humas Sulbar. (2018). “Manajemen Konflik Sengketa Tanah di Sulbar”. http://www.humassulbarprov.id.
9. Joyosumarto, et. al. (2013). Geospatial Information and Regional Border Disputes in the Regional Boundary Affirmation Activities in the Era of Regional Autonomy in Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Annual Scientific Forum of the Indonesian Surveyors Association at the College of Land.
10. Lai, L.W.C., Davies, S.N.G., Chau, K.W. et al. (2018). The Determination Of The “True” Property Boundary In Planned Development: A Coasian Analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 61: 579–599.
11. Muqoyyidin, A.W. (2013). Pemekaran Wilayah dan Otonomi Daerah Pasca Reformasi di Indonesia: Konsep, Fakta Empiris dan Rekomendasi ke Depan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(2): 287- 309.
12. Poniman, A. (eds). (2016). Accelerating National Development through Geospatial Information. Cibinong: SCIENCE PRESS.
13. Qodir, Z & Laksono, T. (2012). Politik Rente dan Konflik di Daerah Pemekaran: Kasus Maluku Utara. Jusuf Kalla School of Government.
14. Ratnawari, T. (2010). Satu Dasa Warsa Pemekaran Daerah Era Reformasi: Kegagalan Otonomi Daerah? Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 21: 122-235.
15. Saliternik, M. (2017). Expanding The Boundaries Of Boundary Dispute Settlement: International Law And Critical Geography At The Crossroads. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 50(1): 113-154.
16. Sindonews. (2018). “314 Daerah Antre Menunggu Pemekaran”. https://nasional.sindonews.com/berita/1283560/12/314-daerah-antre-menunggu-pemekaran.
17. Sulistyono. D., Nuryadin, D., & Hadi, A.S. (2014). Evaluasi Tim Penegasan Batas Daerah (Studi Kasus di Provinsi Lampung dan Kalimantan Timur). Jurnal Bina Praja, 6(1): 53-64.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
