The Role of Active Constructive Feedback in Building Employee Performance (Case study at a private construction company in Indonesia 2018-2019)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/wj223990Keywords:
Feedback, performance management,, performance appraisal,Abstract
--Feedback becomes an important part of the performance appraisal process. Feedback is one of the processes to explore the strengths of employees so that it is easier to identify many competencies and the potential of each employee. But the fact is that there are still many leaders who do not consider feedback as an important activity. This has an impact on improving individual performance. This paper aims to describe the activities of leaders at the managerial level in the technical division in the process of improving the performance of their members in 2018 at one of Indonesia's private construction companies. Secondary data were obtained from individual development programs, assessment results, performance appraisal in 2017, while primary data were obtained from field notes, interviews and observations. To express this incident a qualitative case study method is used. The sampling technique is done by purposive and quota sampling and assigns 10 technical division employees as informants. Invalidating the findings of researchers involving the HR management team, leadership, HR practitioners The assessment process carried out by some leaders in assessing technical competencies, core competencies of the company and measuring key performance indicators employees are quite effective, but formal meaningful face-to-face activities have not been used optimally, especially in providing constructive active feedback. In the era of the Industrial Revolution, 4.0 leaders need to understand the philosophy of employee performance appraisal effectively. Based on these findings, human resource managers need to design effective feedback skills training and provide rewards to managers who carry out constructive feedback well.
Downloads
References
1. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2012). Delivering effective performance feedback: The strengths-based approach. Business Horizons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.004
2. Aguinis, H., Mazurkiewicz, M. D., & Heggestad, E. D. (2009). Using Web-Based Frame-of-Reference Personality-Based Job Analysis : An Experimental Field Study. Personnel Psychology.
3. Allin, L., & Turnock, C. (2007). Reflection on and in the work place. Making Practice-Based Learning Work Www. Practicebasedlearning. Org/Home, Accessed, 1(07), 2010.
4. Axley, S. R. (1984). Managerial and Organizational Communication in Terms of the Conduit Metaphor. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4279664
5. Bernardin, H. J., & Russel, J. E. . (1993). Human Resourses management. New York: Mc Graw Hill Inc.
6. Chiaburu, D. S., & Tekleab, A. G. (2005). Individual and contextual influences on multiple dimensions of training effectiveness. Journal of European Industrial Training. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590510627085
7. Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple Uses of Performance Appraisal: Prevalence and Correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.1.130
8. Cones, T., & Jenkins, M. (2000). Abolishing Performance Appraisals. San Francisco, CA, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
9. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.): Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Basics of. Qualitatice Research 2nd Edition. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
10. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Studies. In Workshop for the 2011 Society for Social Work and Research annual meeting. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00097.x/full
11. DeNisi, A. S., & Kluger, A. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness: Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Executive. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2000.2909845
12. Dessler. (2005). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Alih bahasa: Eli Tanya. Penyunting Bahasa: Budi Supriyanto. Jakarta: Indeks. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial.
13. Dessler, G. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. In Pelatihan dan Pengembangan. https://doi.org/10.1145/2505515.2507827
14. Devi, V. R., & Shaik, N. (2012). Training & development – a jump starter for employee performance and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research.
15. Dihoff, R. E., Brosvic, G. M., & Epstein, M. L. (2003). The role of feedback during academic testing: The delay retention effect revisited. Psychological Record. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395451
16. Iswanto, Y. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia.
17. Kaihatu, T. S. (2006). Good Corporate Governance Dan Privatisasi. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan.
18. Kingry, M. J., Tiedje, L. B., & Friedman, L. L. (1990). Focus groups: a research technique for nursing. Nursing Research, 39(2), 124–125.
19. Luthra, A., & Dahiya, K. (2015). Organizational Communication and Management Effectiveness: An analytical Study at Various Managerial Levels. InternatIonal Journal of ManageMent & BusIness StudIes.
20. McLafferty, I. (2004). Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03186.x
21. Pattanayak, B. (2009). Human Resource Management, PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 20.
22. Prasad, L. M. (2006). Human Resource Management (Sultan Chand & Sons. Educational Publishers.
23. Rony, Z. T. (2017). Siap Fokus, Siap Menulis Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi (Jurus Mudah Gunakan Metode Kualitatif Tipe Studi Kasus). Jakarta: PSSDM.
24. Rony, Z. T. (2019). Generation y challenges in becoming innovative leaders at organization in the 21st century. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1164.0982S919
25. Shen, J., & Darby, R. (2006). Training and management development in Chinese multinational enterprises. Employee Relations. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450610673402
26. Youngcourt, S. S., Leiva, P. I., & Jones, R. G. (2007). Perceived purposes of performance appraisal: Correlates of individual- And position-focused purposes on attitudinal outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1207
27. Zane, B., Marie de, V., Nancy, B., Linda, D., & Donna, S. (2002). The increasing scope of training and development competency. Benchmarking.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
