PREVALENCE OF LEARNING DISORDER AMONG STUDENTS OF SOCIO-ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED FAMILY IN MANIKANDAM BLOCK OF TIRUCHIRAPPALLI DISTRICT- A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/z13r4x46Keywords:
tudent of disadvantaged family,, earning disorders/ disability, Below Poverty LineAbstract
Various research studies have proved that Disability is generally more common among children living in poverty than among those not living in poverty. In the education system, the disproportionate recognition of learning disorders in such socio demographic groups, especially, the already disadvantaged group is viewed as a chronic issue. Students who are misidentified with a learning disorder may be extremely limited in their academic and social environments, while the students with a learning disorder who are never identified are less likely to obtain the adaptations and modifications required to explore out their full potential. Therefore, the poverty and learning disorders can decrease the likelihood of completing the high school education which is considered as great barrier in breaking the intergenerational cycle of poverty. Aim: The main aim of the present study is to understand the different type of learning disorder among students of socio-economically disadvantaged family. The objectives of the study are: to describe the socio-demographic characteristic of the respondents, to identify the different type of learning disorder among students of socio-economically disadvantaged family. descriptive research design has been adopted. The universe of the study consists of students of socio-economically disadvantaged family in Manikandam block of Tiruchirappalli district. There are about 190 sample were selected. The module NIMHAANS index for specific learning disabilities ( modified version) has been adopted to identify the various learning disorder. More than half (51.0 percent) of the students of socio-economically disadvantaged family are identified with different types of Learning Disorders so they should be given appropriated intervention by psychologist in order to overcome the leaning disorder of the students of socio-economically disadvantaged family.
Downloads
References
1. Abhishek P Iyer, J. Karthikeyan, MD. Rakibul Hasan Khan, P.M. Binu (2020) An analysis of Artificial Intelligence in Biometrics-The next level of security. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7 (1), 571-576.
2. Bateman, B. (2005). The play’s the thing. Learning Disabilities Quarterly,28(2), 93-95
3. Bauman LJ, Silver EJ, Stein RE. Cumulative social disadvantage and child health. Pediatrics. 2006;117(4):1321 – 1328. [PubMed]
4. Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GJ. The effects of poverty on children. Future of children. 1997;7(2):55–71.
5. Christopher Rajasekaran.W, Karthikeyan.J, Chong Seng Tong, Karunakaran.T, (2019) “Outlook of university students and their profession strategy ”, Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, Vol. 11, 11-Special Issue, 848-854.
6. Dombrowski, S. C., Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(4), 364-372.
7. Fredrick, L., & Karthikeyan, J. (2018). Exploring the reach of mobile assisted language learning among mechanical engineering students. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(8), 738-742.
8. Harris, J. D., Gray, B. A., Davis, J. E., Zaremba, E. T., & Argulewicz, E. N. (1997). The exclusionary clause and the disadvantaged: Do we try to comply with the law? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(9), 581-583.
9. Houtrow AJ, Okumura MJ. Pediatric mental health problems and associated burden on families. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies. 2011;6(3):222–233.
10. Lustig D, Strauser D. Causal relationships between poverty and disability. Rehabilitation counseling bulletin. 2007;50(4):194-202.
11. Lustig DC, Strauser DR. Causal relationships between poverty and disability. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 2007;50(4):194–202.
12. Marmot MG, Kogevinas M, Elston MA. Social/economic status and disease. Annual Review of Public Health. 1987;8:111–135.
13. Pallavi Verma, Saksham Bhutani, S. Srividhya, J Karthikeyan,Chong Seng Tong (2020) Review of internet of things towards sustainable development in agriculture. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7 (3), 148-151.
14. R.Vasanthan. and R.Nandhini. (2014)Activities based content for language teaching at the college level: An Indian classroom perspective. Man In India, 94 (4) : 987-995 p.989
15. Shanmuga Sundari, P., & Subaji, M. (2019). Aspect level sentiment analysis in deep learning technique using CNN. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(2 Special Issue), 262-270.
16. Shanmuga Sundari, P., Subaji, M., & Karthikeyan, J. (2017). A survey on effective similarity search models and techniques for big data processing in healthcare system. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 10(8), 2677-2684.
17. Sheeba, W. T., & Karthikeyan, J. (2018). Factors that psychologically impede second language learners from speaking english- a perspective study among civil engineering students. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(8), 1233-1237
18. Vasanathan, R., Balaji, P., & Dzuvichu, K. (2019). A study on kinaesthetic style preferences and second language learning requirements at the primary level. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(11 Special Issue)
19. Weintraub, F. (2005). The evolution of LD policy and future challenges. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 28(2), 97-99.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
