Spatial Variation of Tropical Urban Carbon Dioxide Concentration: A Case Study of KualaLumpur

Authors

  • Nasir Nayan NILL Author
  • Mohmadisa Hashim Nill Author
  • Yazid Saleh nill Author
  • Hanifah Mahat nill Author
  • Madeline Henry Luyan nill Author
  • Nur Suhaila Mohd Zaky nill Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/x0wqff65

Keywords:

carbon dioxide,, Kuala Lumpur, concentration

Abstract

Many of the studies related to air pollution in urban areas also consider the role of carbon dioxide (CO2) in determining the level of urban air pollution, especially in urban areas with high rates of motor vehicle use. Therefore, this study aimed to study the level of carbon dioxide concentration in the city of Kuala Lumpur by looking at the patterns of carbon dioxide concentration in the room at night and during the day. The study results and the steps to reduce this amount of CO2 can be done in the right place. This study uses data collected from field studies with Handled Temp / RH / CO2 tools to obtain carbon dioxide concentration data in six urban zones of Kuala Lumpur. Each zone will be represented by two sampling stations whose criteria are in the urban area and not in the open area. For this reason, most of the stations selected are in the open parking area. Sampling times are at night (1-4am) and daylight (1-4pm). Descriptive statistics and regression interpolation are used with the help of geographic information system software ArcGIS version 9.3. The findings showed that the average concentration of carbon dioxide at station 1 (Dataran Merdeka) was highest at night with an average reading of 458.125 part per million (ppm), and during the day, its reading was 420.125 ppm. The lowest carbon dioxide concentration was at night at Station 11 (Tesco extra Cheras) at 396 ppm and during the day at station 10 (Bukit Jalil Stadium) at 397.625 ppm. The overall average for night and day was at Station 1 at 436.31 ppm and Station 10 with a mean of 396.5 ppm. Carbon dioxide concentration levels were determined based on previous studies. The highest levels were 415.26 ppm, medium-high 401 ppm to 415.25 ppm, and the lowest was 400 ppm. It is found that urban zones have the highest levels of carbon dioxide concentration compared to other zones.In conclusion, this station needs to be reduced in carbon dioxide as it can have adverse effects if not curbed as it impairs health and can lead to increased greenhouse gases. Effective steps need to be taken so that carbon dioxide emissions can be controlled and minimized and to address the problem of global warming. The study implies that in Kuala Lumpur, the concentration of carbon dioxide is at a relatively high level.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abdel Galeil A. Hassan. (2015). Diurnal and monthly variations in atmospheric CO2 level in Qena, Upper Egypt. Resources and Environment, 5(2), 59-65.

2. Albo, A., Luis, P. and Irabin, A. (2010). Carbon dioxide capture from flue gases using a crossflow membrane contactor and the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium ethyl sulfate. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49: 11045–11051.

3. Bastviken, D., Sundgren, I., Natchimuthu, S., Reyier, H., & Galfalk, M. (2015). Cost-efficient approaches to measure carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes and concentrations in terrestrial and aquatic environments using mini loggers.Biogeosciences 12, 3849–3859. DOI:10.5194/bg-12-3849-2015.

4. Bhattacharyya,G. K & Arunima Sarma. (2015). Comprehensive environmentalstudies. United Kingdom: Alpha Science.

5. Blunden, J. & D. S. Arndt, (Eds.) (2019). State of the Climate in 2018. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 100(9), Si–S305, DOI:10.1175/2019BAMSStateoftheClimate.1.

6. Cetin, M., Sevik, H., & Isinkaralar, K. (2017). Changes in the particulate matter and CO2 concentrations based on the time and weather conditions: the case of Kastamonu. Oxidation Communications, 40(1), 477-485.

7. Christopherson, W. R. (2010). Elemental Geosystems. New York: Prentice-Hall.

8. Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL). (2008). Draf Pelan Bandar Raya KualaLumpur 2020, Jilid 1 Menuju ke Arah Bandar Raya Bertaraf Dunia. Kuala Lumpur: Pencetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

9. Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur (DBKL). (2020). Pelan Struktur Kuala Lumpur 2020. Diperoleh daripada http://www.dbkl.gov.my/pskl2020/malay/zon/index.htm.

10. Doll, J. E., & M. Baranski. (2011). Greenhouse gas basics. Climate Change and Agriculture Fact Sheet Series, Extension Bulletin E-3148. Michigan State University Extension

11. Grace, J. (2012). Vegetation and environmental change. In An Introduction ToPhysical Geography And The Environment, Holden. J (Ed.). England:Pearson, 720-739.

12. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2012). World Energy Outlook 2012. Download from https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2012

13. Jabatan Meteorologi Malaysia (JMM). (2017). Laporan Tahunan 2016. Petaling Jaya: Jabatan Meteorologi Malaysia.

14. Jabatan Meteorologi Malaysia (JMM). (2018). Laporan Tahunan 2017. Petaling Jaya: Jabatan Meteorologi Malaysia.

15. Junaidi Awang Besar, Rosmadi Fauzi, Amer Saifude Ghazali, Hazim Abdul Ghani & Zainun Abidin Baharum. (2017). Kuala Lumpur dan cabaran baru pembangunan berterusan (Kuala Lumpur and the new challenges of continuous development). Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 10(6), 75-85.

16. Lindsey, R. (2019). Climate change: Atmospheric carbon dioxide. Download 1 Oktober 2019, Download fromhttps://www.climate.gov/newsfeatures/understandingclimate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide

17. Liu, M., Xiyang Zhu, Chen Pan, Liang Chen, Hao Zhang, Wenxiao Jia & Weining Xiang. (2016). Spatial variation of near-surface CO2 concentration during spring in Shanghai. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 7, 31-39.

18. Lockwood, J. G. (2012). Atmospheric process. In An Introduction To Physical Geography And The Environment, Holden. J (Editor). England: Pearson, 77-115.

19. Miler, T. G & Spoolman, E. S. (2019). Environmental Science. (16th Ed.). United State Of America: Cengage.

20. Myers, N & Spoolman, E. S. (2014). Environmental Issues and Solutions: A modular approach. United Kingdom: Cengage.

21. NationalOceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).(2019). Earth SystemResearch Laboratory. Global Monitoring Division Trends in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Download 1 October 2019, https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html.

22. New Straits Times. (2019, May 14). 415.26 parts per million: CO2 level hit historic high. Download 1 Oktober 2019, from https://www.nst.com.my/world/2019/05/488181/41526-parts-million-co2-levels-hit-historic-high

23. Okimamhe, A. A. & Okelola, O. F. (2013). Assessment of carbon dioxide emission at road junctions in the southeast of Niger State, Nigeria. Alam Cipta, 6(2), 59-71.

24. PLAN Malaysia. (2019). Perbandaran di Malaysia. Download 5 November 2019, Fromhttps://www.townplan.gov.my/kompendium/perbandaranmalaysia/perbandaranmalaysia.pdf

25. Reynolds, J. S., Rohli, V. R., Johson, K. J., Waylen, R. P., & Francek, M. A. (2015). Exploring Physical Geography. New York: McGraw-Hill.

26. Samiaji, T. (2011). Gas Co2 di Wilayah Indonesia. Berita Dirgantara. 12(2), 68-75.

27. Suresh, K. A., Pardis, F., Sufia, A., & Abhijit, M. (2018). Near-surface air temperature and carbon dioxide in Indian Sundarbans: A time series analysis. ParanaJournal of Science and Education, 4(1), 10-15.

28. Topham, S., et al. (2014).Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. UnitedState: Wiley.

29. Yahaya, N. Z., Ghazali, N. 1., & Ishak, F. ( n.d). A review of carbon dioxide (CO2) Malaysia: Current status and challenges. Download 1 Oktober 2019, from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/themes/ForFITS/NoorZaitunYahaya Lecturer Uni versity_Malaysia_Terengganu_-

A_Review_of_CO2_in_Malaysia Current_status_and_Challenges.pdf

30. Yu, Jhih-Yuan, Chang, Ken-Hui. & Chen, Tu-Fu. (2016). Estimation of CO2 Assimilation and Emission Flux of Vegetation in Subtropical Island – Taiwan. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 16: 3302–3311. DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2016.07.0309.

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

Nayan, N., Hashim, M., Saleh, Y., Mahat, H., Luyan, M. H., & Zaky, N. S. M. (2020). Spatial Variation of Tropical Urban Carbon Dioxide Concentration: A Case Study of KualaLumpur. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 9049-9074. https://doi.org/10.61841/x0wqff65