Visual Communication in Corporate Brands: A Semiological Discourse Analysis of car Brochures

Authors

  • Mamona Khan Assistant professor, Department of English, The Women University Multan Author
  • Noreena Amjad M.Pil researcher The Women University Multan Author
  • Dr. Iram Rubab Assistant professor, Department of English, The Women University Sialkot Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/7ttnc596

Keywords:

Semiotics, Car Brochures, Customers, Sellers, Visual communication, Contextualization, High modality, Persuasion

Abstract

The process of marketization has greatly been accelerated by the use of visual communication. The companies publish brochures using various semiotic modes to promote their products and cope with the product promotion rivalry. Brochures let your product speak for itself and communicate with the consumers and attract their attention. The present study attempts to explore the semiotic features in car brochures as they play an important part in business communication in convincing people towards a specific communicative goal. It also aims to analyze the brochures ‘images and how these images are used to establish relations with the costumers. The study, as such, is essentially qualitative in nature and placed within interpretive paradigm. Following purposive sampling, two brochures of Toyota (2014) and Honda (2017) have been selected and analyzed using the model of Kress & Leeuwen’s “Semiotic Analysis” (2006). The results of this study indicate that a complex set of relationship is established between the image and their viewers through visuals. The companies use specific visual strategies including contextualization, illumination and representation effectively to enhance the content. Moreover, different color composition and texts are used to achieve their marketing goals; the popularity of the brand and to establish seller-buyer relationship successfully. It was revealed that use of high modulation in the setting create reliability and credibility of the product. Finally, the Findings also revealed how discourses influence society The present study will be helpful in enhancing the comprehension of how different companies use visuals as strategic tool to establish corporate identity in general and the semiotic organization and underlying meaning structure in the brochures of Honda and Corolla car in particular. It will also contribute in providing useful insights to the market researchers

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Barthes , R. (1973). Mythologies. St Albans, Paladin.

2. Barthes, R. (1977). Image –Music-Text. London, Fontana.

3. Bignell, J. (2002). Media semiotics: An introduction. Manchester University Press.

4. Budiarti, H. &Soerjowardhana, A. (2013). Genre Analysis of Standfort University Brochures.

5. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications

6. Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Advances in Semiotics.Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press

7. Halliday, M.A.K. (1978) Language as a Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.

8. Halliday, M, .K.,&Hasan, R. (1985). Language, Context and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.

9. Holman, R. M. H. (1977). Communicational properties of women's clothing: Isolation of discriminable clothing ensembles and identification of attributions made to one person wearing each ensemble.

10. Holman, R. H. (1983). Possessions and Property: The Semiotics of Consumer Behavior. ACR North American Advances.10, 565-568.

11. Hodge, R. & Kress, G. (1988).Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

12. Kress, G. (1993). Against arbitrariness: the social function of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 169-191.

13. Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Psychology Press.

14. Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

15. Leeuwen, V. (2005).Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.

16. Liu, J. (2013). Visual Images Interpretive Strategies in Multimodal Texts. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(6), pp 1259-1263

17. Mick, D. G., Burroughs, J. E., Hetzel, P., &Brannen, M. Y. (2004).Pursuing the meaning of meaning in the commercial world: An international review of marketing and consumer research founded on semiotics. Semiotica, 2004(152-1/4), 1-74.

18. Oswald, L. R. (2015). The structural semiotics paradigm for marketing research: Theory, methodology, and case analysis. Semiotica, 201 (205), 115-148.

19. Parmentier, R. J. (1994). Signs in society: Studies in semiotic anthropology. Indiana University Press.

20. Peirce, C. S. (1931). Collected writings (8 Vols.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 58.

21. Peirce, C. S. (1931-58). The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vols. I-VI [Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (eds.)], Vols. VII–VIII [Arthur W. Burks (ed.)] Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press

22. Ramachandran, S. (2005). Analysing visual and textual content of tourism brochures: A case of Malaysian destination image. TEAM Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 1(2), 69-80.

23. Saussure, F. D. (1983, [1916]).Course in General Linguistics.trans. R. Harris, London: Duckworth.

24. Tsotra, D., Janson, M., &Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2004). Marketing on the Internet: A semiotic analysis. AMCIS 2004 Proceedings, 526

Downloads

Published

31.10.2020

How to Cite

Khan, M., Amjad, N., & Rubab, I. (2020). Visual Communication in Corporate Brands: A Semiological Discourse Analysis of car Brochures. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 8210-8221. https://doi.org/10.61841/7ttnc596