THE ROLE OF THINKING STYLES AS MEDIATORS BETWEEN PERMISSIVE PARENTING STYLES AND CAREER DECISION SELF-EFFICACY OF INDONESIAN GEN Z YOUTHS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/zedaee56Keywords:
career decision self-efficacy, permissive parenting styles, ; thinking styles, gen zAbstract
Career decision self-efficacy (CDSE), which alludes to an individual’s capacity to effectively make imperative career-related choices, is emphatically affected by two components: parenting styles and thinking styles. Hence, this non-experimental quantitative consider analyzes the effects of parenting styles and thinking styles on the CDSE of gen Z youths. The members comprised of 617 gen Z students (11th and 12th grades) from three driving schools in Jakarta, Indonesia, whereas the measuring disobedient included the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale – Short Form, the Parental Authority Questionnaire, and the Thinking and Styles Inventory - Revised II. Based on the discoveries, CDSE was altogether affected by the permissive parenting styles as well as the Type I, Type II, and Type III Thinking Styles. Besides, the intervention investigation found that the thinking style intervened the relationship between the permissive parenting styles and CDSE.
Downloads
References
1. Albion, M. J., & Fogarty, G. J. (2002). Career decision making difficulties of adolescent boys and girls. Australian Journal of Career Development, 9, 14–19.
2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49(2), 155-173.
3. Babbitt, L. G., Brown, D., & Mazaheri, N. (2015). Gender, entrepreneurship, and the formal–informal dilemma: Evidence from Indonesia. World Development, 72, 163-174.
4. Baumrind, D. (1978). Parental disciplinary patterns and social competence in children. Youth and Society, 9, 239–276.
5. Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting styles on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 56–95.
6. Betz, N. E., Klein, K. L., & Taylor, K. M. (1996). Evaluation of a short form of the Career decision self-efficacy scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 4(1), 47-57.
7. Buri, J. R. (1991). Parental authority questionnaire. Journal of personality assessment, 57(1), 110-119.
8. Colfer, C. J. P., Achdiawan, R., Roshetko, J. M., Mulyoutami, E., Yuliani, E. L., Mulyana, A., & Adnan, H. (2015). The balance of power in household decision-making: encouraging news on gender in Southern Sulawesi. World Development, 76, 147-164.
9. Creed, P., Patton, W., & Prideaux, L. (2006). Causal relationship between career indecision and career decision-making self-efficacy. Journal of Career Development, 33(1), 47-65.
10. Fan, J. (2016). The role of thinking styles in career decision self-efficacy among university students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 20, 63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.03.001
11. Fan, J., & Zhang, L. F. (2014). The role of perceived parenting styles in thinking styles. Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 204-211.
12. Gati, I., & Saka, N. (2001). High school students' career-related decision-making difficulties.
Journal of Counseling and Development, 79, 331–340.
13. Guay, F., Senecal, C., Gauthier, L., & Fernet, C. (2003). Predicting career indecision: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(2), 166-177.
14. Gushue, G. V., & Whitson, M. L. (2006). The relationship among support, ethnic identity, career decision self-efficacy, and outcome expectations in African American high school students: Applying social cognitive career theory. Journal of Career Development, 33, 112-125.
15. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16. Kunnen, E. S., Sappa, V., van Geert, P. L., & Bonica, L. (2008). The shapes of commitment development in emerging adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 15, 113–131.
17. Koumoundourou, G., Tsaousis, I., & Kounenou, K. (2011). Parental influences on Greek adolescents' career decision-making difficulties: The mediating role of core self-evaluations. Journal of Career Assessment, 19, 165–182.
18. Lease, S. H., & Dahlbeck, D. T. (2009). Parental influences, career decision-making attributions, and self-efficacy: Differences for men and women. Journal of Career Development, 36, 95–113.
19. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Brenner, B., Chopra, S. B., Davis, T., Talleyrand, R., & Suthakara,
V. (2001). The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science education options. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 474-483.
20. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B., Lyons, H., & Treistman, D. (2003). Relation of the contextual supports and barriers to choice behavior in engineering majors: Test of alternative social cognitive model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50, 458-465.
21. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Sheu, H., Schmidt, J., Brenner, B. R., Gloster, C. S., & Treistman, D. (2005). Social cognitive predictors of academic interests and goals in engineering: Utility for women and students at historically Black universities. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 84-92.
22. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 391.
23. Sawitri, D. R. (2009). Pengaruh status identitas dan efikasi diri keputusan karier terhadap keraguan mengambil keputusan karier pada mahasiswa tahun pertama di Universitas Diponegoro. Jurnal Psikologi Undip, 5 (2).
24. Sawitri, D. R., Creed, P. A., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2015). Longitudinal relations of parental influences and adolescent career aspirations and actions in a collectivist society. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 25(3), 551-563.
25. Sawitri, D. R., & Creed, P. A. (2015). Perceived career congruence between adolescents and their parents as a moderator between goal orientation and career aspirations. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 29-34.
26. Situmorang, D. D. B. (2019). Pengaruh parenting styles terhadap career decision self-efficacy melalui thinking styles: Perbandingan antara siswa laki-laki dan perempuan. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Magister Sains Psikologi Pendidikan, Universitas Indonesia, Depok.
27. Solimun, Fernandes, A. A. R., & Nurjannah. (2017). Metode statistika multivariate pemodelan persamaan structural (SEM) pendekatan WarpPLS. Malang: UB Press.
28. Sovet, L., & Metz, A. J. (2014). Parenting styles and career decision-making among French and Korean adolescents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(3), 345-355.
29. Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (1992). Thinking Styles Inventory (Unpublished test). Yale University.
30. Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Zhang, L. F. (2003). Thinking Styles Inventory – Revised (Unpublished test). Yale University.
31. Sternberg, R. J., Wagner, R. K., & Zhang, L. F. (2007). Thinking Styles Inventory– Revised II (Unpublished test). Tufts University.
32. Surjono, Prasisca, Y., & Sutikno, F. R. (2015). Gender Equality and Social Capital as Rural Development Indicators in Indonesia (Case: Malang Regency, Indonesia). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 370-374.
33. Taylor, K. M., & Betz, N. E. (1983). Applications of self-efficacy theory to the understanding and treatment of career indecision. Journal of vocational behavior, 22(1), 63-81.
34. Trusty, J. (1998). Family influences on educational expectations of late adolescents. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 260–270.
35. Vignoli, E., Croity-Belz, S., Chapeland, V., De Fillipis, A., & Garcia, M. (2005). Career exploration in adolescents: The role of anxiety, attachment, and parenting styles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67, 153–168.
36. White, R. J. (2009). The role of parenting style, ethnicity, and identity style on identity commitment and career decision self-efficacy (Doctoral’s dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (UMI No. 3368670)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
