Intervention to Enhance Cognitive Development Underpinning Reading for Japanese Preschool Children
Keywords:
preschool children, cognitive education, reflection on activitiesAbstract
This study aimed to examine the effects of intervention through a cognitive educational program based on previous research and conducted it on a class of nursery preschoolers. To examine the effects of the intervention, two measures of cognitive abilities (Flanker task / PASS Rating Scale) were administered pre- and post-intervention. We analyzed the activity review sheets filled by children after each session. As a result, the size of interference effects on the response time of the Flanker task in post-intervention decreased compared with that in pre-intervention and the scores of the PASS Rating Scale in post-intervention were higher than that in pre-intervention. Additionally, analyses of the activity review sheets indicated that the descriptions of “content of activity” and “strategy” tended to increase as the sessions progressed. Changes in measures of cognitive abilities suggest that the intervention played an important part in enhancing preschoolers’ cognitive abilities. The result of reflection suggests the fact that we actively provided opportunities to interact with instructors and classmates while verbalizing the contents and strategies of activities during sessions. These results suggest the positive impact of class-wide intervention of cognitive enhancement programs among preschoolers.
Downloads
References
1. Aoki, M., Hamada, K., & Okazaki, S. (2016). Interactive interventions based on cognitive education-a change of cognitive process, performance, and strategies on problem tasks [Paper presentation]. International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology European-Middle East Regional Conference 2016, Cracow, Poland.
2. Aoki, M., Muroya, N., Masunami, T., Matsuzawa, H., Takano, T., Okazaki, S., & Maekawa, H. (2013). The efficacy of the COGENT program in preschool children with high-risk for learning disabilities. Japanese Journal of Disability Sciences, 37, 13–26.
3. Blair, C., McKinnon, R. D., & Daneri, M. P. (2018) Effect of the tools of the mind kindergarten program on children’s
social and emotional development. Childhood Research Quarterly, 43, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.01.002
4. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the Mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
5. Das, J. P. (2009). Reading difficulties and dyslexia: An interpretation for teachers. SAGE Publications.
6. Das, J. P., Hayward, D. V., Samantaray, S. K., & Panda, J. J. (2006). Cognitive enhancement training (COGENT ©): What Is It? How Does It Work with a Group of Disadvantaged Children? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 5(3), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1891/194589506787382440
7. Das, J. P., & Misra, S. B. (2014). Cognitive planning and executive functions: Applications in management and education. SAGE Publications.
8. Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994) Assessment of cognitive processes: the PASS theory of intelligence. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights.
9. Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., & Munro, S. (2007). Preschool programs improve cognitive
control. Science, 318(5855), 1387–1388. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151148
10. Diamond, A., Lee, C., Senften, P., Lam, A., & Abbott, D. (2019). Randomized control trial of Tools of the Mind:
Marked benefits to kindergarten children and their teachers. PLOS ONE, 14(9), e0222447.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222447
11. Hayward, D., Das, J. P., & Janzen, T. (2007). Innovative programs for improvement in reading through cognitive
enhancement: A remediation study of Canadian First Nations children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(5), 443–
457. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400050801
12. Hirai, M., Nijima, M., & Nakayama, K. (2009). Practice of cognitive enhancement program in Japanese regular class.
Bulletin of University of Teacher Education Fukuoka, 63, 167–179.
13. Holmes, A. J., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2007). Task feedback effects on conflict monitoring and executive control:
Relationship to subclinical measures of depression. Emotion, 7(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.68
14. Johnson, W. L., & Maricle, D. E. (2022) Assessing and Intervening with Children with Executive Function Disorders. In Miller, D. C., Maricle, D. E., Bedford C. L., & Gettman, J. A. Best Practices in School Neuropsychology: Guidelines for Effective Practice, Assessment, and Evidence-Based Intervention.
15. Keat, O. B, Rajaratnam, M. L., & Yuniardi, M. S. (2020). The Profiling of PASS Cognitive Processing among Children with Learning Difficulties. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(5). https://doi.org/3205- 3214 10.37200/IJPR/V2415/PR202028
16. Luria, A. R. (1966). Human brain and psychological processes. Basic Books.
17. McDermott, J. M., Perez-Edgar, K., & Fox, N. A. (2007). Variation of the flanker paradigm: Assessing selective attention in young children. Behavior Research Methods, 39(1), 62-70.
18. Naglieri, J. A. & Pickering, E. B. (2003). Helping children learn -Intervention handouts for use in school and at home. Paul H. Publishing.
19. National Institute for Educational Policy Research (2023) Research on the quality of upbringing, learning and processes from early childhood. https://www.nier.go.jp/05_kenkyu_seika/pdf_seika/r05/r050425-02_honbun2.pdf (Original article is Japanese only.)
20. Rueda, M. R. & Conejero (2020) Developing attention and self-regulation in infancy and childhood. In Rubenstein, J., Rakic. P., Chen, B., & Kwan, K. Y (Eds.), Neural Circuit and Cognitive Development: Comprehensive Developmental Neuroscience. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-00830-3
21. Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Halparin, J. D., Gruber, D. B., Lercari, L. P., & Posner, M. I. (2004) Development of attentional networks in childhood. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1029 – 1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.012
22. Scionti, N., Cavallero, M., Zogmaister, C., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2020) Is cognitive training effective for improving executive function in preschoolers? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02812
23. Solomon, T., Plamondon, A., O’Hara, A., Finch, H., Goco, G., Chaban, P., Huggins, L., Ferguson, B., & Tannock, R. (2018). A cluster randomized-controlled trial of the impact of the Tools of the Mind curriculum on self-regulation in Canadian preschoolers. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02366
24. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber, & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, (Vol. 1), Problems of General Psychology (pp. 39–285). Plenum Press (original work published 1934).
25. Wang, X., Georgiou, G. K., & Das, J. P. (2012). Examining the effects of PASS cognitive processes on Chinese reading accuracy and fluency. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.006.
26. Yoshikawa, H., Weiland, C., Brooks-Gunn, J., Burchinal, M. R., Espinosa, L. M., Gormley, W. T., Ludwig, J., Magnuson, K. A., Phillips, D., & Zaslow, M. J. (2013). Investing in Our Future: The Evidence Base on Preschool Education.
27. Yoshonen Kenkyujo. (1973). The Japanese reading ability test for preschoolers and pupils．Kanekoshobo.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
