Embodiment of Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 concerning Marriage Agreements in Notarial Deeds
Keywords:
Marriage Agreement, Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, Notarial DeedAbstract
This research aims to analyze and discuss the implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUUXIII/2015 concerning Marriage Agreements in Notarial Deeds. The Constitutional Court through Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 has expanded the meaning of the time a marriage agreement is made. The extension of the time limit for making a marriage agreement occurred in line with the granting of part of the request submitted by Mrs. Ike Farida, an Indonesian citizen who married a foreigner (Japan) to the Constitutional Court. The research method used in this research is the normative legal research method, namely research into the legal rules themselves (legislation, jurisprudence, customary law or other unwritten law) and legal principles. The research results show that based on the Constitutional Court Decision and the Marriage Law which regulates marriage agreements, it can be concluded that there are several visible changes, namely: 1. Time when the marriage agreement is made, 2. Entry into force of the marriage agreement, 3. Contents of the marriage agreement, 4. Revocation of the marriage agreement. If it does not refer to the provisions of the Civil Code, there is no obligation to put the agreement in the form of a notarial deed, as long as the agreement is made with mutual consent. A marriage agreement can also be made in writing privately, but this has weaknesses in proof. Therefore, it is better to set out a marriage agreement in the form of a notarial deed, because a notarial deed is an authentic deed that has the highest evidentiary power guaranteed in the Law on the Position of Notaries, the Constitutional Court Decision is the basis for jurisprudence in making marriage agreement deeds in line with changes in the regulation of marriage agreements through MK decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 in relation to the duties and authority of notaries. The embodiment of Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 in relation to the duties and authority of Notaries so that it reflects legal certainty, justice and expediency is by means of a marriage agreement that has been made in writing by the parties using a Notarial deed (authentic deed) must be registered with the parties to marriage registrar employees for the sake of perfection and security of the parties and third parties. Furthermore, it is necessary to include the concept of marriage agreement guidelines in the implementation of Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 in the form of Law Implementation Regulations in order to create detailed and comprehensive guidelines for drafting marriage agreements, considering that currently there are no guidelines for drafting them.
Downloads
References
1. Abady, A., R., P., & Rahayu, M., I., F. 2023. Penyuluhan Hukum Pembuatan Akta oleh Notaris Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Journal on Education, Vol. 5, No. 2, 4248-4258.
2. Achmad, A., S. 2023. Tanggung Jawab Profesi Hukum Notaris dalam Tindakan Malapraktik dan Deliberate Dishonesty Action. Jejak Pustaka: Yogyakarta.
3. Agustine,Oly Viana, 2017, “Politik Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.69/PUUXIII/2015 Dalam Menciptakan Keharmonisan Perkawinan, Peneliti Mahkamah Konstitusi”, Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol. 6, Nomor 1.
4. Ayuningtyas, P. 2020. Sanksi Terhadap Notaris dalam Melanggar Kode Etik. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, Vol. 9, No. 2, 95-104.
5. Charissa, A. 2022. Peran Notaris Terkait Pengesahan Perjanjian Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 69/PUU-XIII/2015 Serta Pentingnya Pencatatan Pencatatan Perjanjian Perkawinan Terhadap Pihak Ketiga (Analisa Putusan No. 59/Pdt.G/2018/PN Bgr). Indonesian Notary, Vol. 4, No. 2
6. Dahlan, ”Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Terkait Aspek Pidana Dibidang Kenotariatan”, Jurnal IlmuHukum , vol 18 no 1, april 2016.
7. Gorda, A., N., S., R. 2023. Akibat Hukum untuk Pemegang Hak Tanggungan Atas Vonis Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor. 69/ PUU-XIII/ 2015 Tentang Perjanjian Pernikahan. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, Vol. 6, No. 1, 115-131
8. Iliyin, I., N., & Bayuaji, R., & Yaqin, K. 2023. Kedudukan Hukum Perjanjian Kawin Pada Masa Perkawinan yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Wijaya Putra, Vol. 1, No. 2, 79-91.
9. Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, 2002, Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia, Indonesia Legal Centre Publishing, Jakarta.
10. Masri, Esther dan Sri Wahyuni, 2021, “Implementasi Perjanjian Perkawinan Sebelum, Saat Dan Sesudah Perkawinan”, Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah, Vol 21 No.1.
11. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015
12. http://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt56a5c5 3a38ebc/meski-telat--perjanjian-perkawinan-perlu-didaftarkan,
13. Rizal,Sofian Syaiful, 2019, “Kekuatan Hukum Akta Notaris Tentang Perjanjian Perkawinan Terhadap Penetapan Perkara Perdata no. 264/Pdt.P/2010 di Pengadilan Negeri Probolinggo”, VOICE JUSTITIA : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Volume 3 Nomor 1.
14. Rumiartha. I. N. P. B., Astariyani, N. L. G., & Indradewi, A.A.S. (2022). Human Rights of Indigenous People in Indonesia: A Constitutional Approach. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 15(2), 395-402. http://journal.yiil.org/home/archives_v15n2_10
15. Rumiartha, I. N. P. B., Astariyani, N. L. G., & Amaral. A. M. (2022). The Comparative Law on the Distribution of Power in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the Constitution of the Republic Timor Leste. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 10(3), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v10i3.1134
16. Setiadewi, K., & Wijaya, I., M., H. 2020. Legalitas Akta Notaris Berbasis Cyber Notary Sebagai Akta Otentik. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Vol. 6, No. 1, 126-134
17. Shidqi, M (2021) Perjanjian Perkawinan Pemisahan Harta Bagi Pasangan Suami Istri Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.69/PUU-XIII/2015 Prespektif Maqasid Al Syari'ah. Masters thesis, IAIN Ponorogo
18. Sirait, G., N., & Djaja, B. 2023. Pertanggungjawaban Akta Notaris Sebagai Akta Autentik Sesuai Dengan UndangUndang Jabatan Notaris. UNES LAW REVIEW, Vol. 5, Issue 4, 3363-3378.
19. Sopiyan, M. 2023. Analisis Perjanjian Perkawinan dan Akibatnya Menurut Undang-Undang Perkawinan di Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Masyarakat, Vol. 6, No. 2, 175-190.
20. Suharjono, 1995, “Varia Peradilan Tahun XI Nomor 123”, Sekilas Tinjauan Akta Menurut Hukum.
21. Sukemi, F., 1988, “Varia Peradilan Tahun IV Nomor 36”, Notaris dan Kode Etik.
22. Sutanto, Tanpa tahun, “Pengertian Perjanjian Kawin”, URL: http://www.academia.edu.com
23. Susilowati,Nyoman Sri, 2022, Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Perjanjian Perkawinan Pada Perkawinan Campuran Dalam Perspektif Gender Terkait Fungsi Notaris Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015, (disertasi) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana, Denpasar.
24. Yuvens Damian Agata, 2017, “Analisis Kritis terhadap Perjanjian Perkawinan dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 69/PUU-XIII/2015”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Volume 14, Nomor 4, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Depok.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
