Entrepreneurial Leadership of Private School Principals in Thailand: The Pathway to School Effectiveness through School Culture and Organizational Citizenship Behavior

Authors

  • Naritchaya Kongjinda Educational Administration, Kasetsart University, Thailand Author
  • Achara Niyamabha faculty, Kasetsart University, Thailand Author
  • Wisut Wichitpatcharaporn faculty, Kasetsart University, Thailand Author
  • Kanda Sakulthanasakdi Moore Consultant of National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization) Author
  • Suphot Koedsuwan Educational administration faculty, Kasetsart University, Thailand. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/we956p18

Keywords:

entrepreneurial leadership, school culture, organizational citizenship behavior, school effectiveness, private schools

Abstract

School effectiveness is one of the key success factors in school. Since the private schools in Thailand today have faced new challenges that affect the capability to compete and have made many private schools struggling to survive, increasing school effectiveness is the prospective solution for schools. School effectiveness today is multi-facet and has been defined in its own context. The school principal is the one who sets the direction and leads the school to success. Entrepreneurial leadership is presented as the character of the leader who will lead the organization to its goal in the time of difficulty and we adopted it to use in a school context, to propel the school effectiveness through school culture and the teacher’s organizational citizenship behavior. The objectives of this study were to study entrepreneurial leadership of the school principals, school culture, teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior, and school effectiveness of private schools in Thailand, and to investigate the structural equation model of school effectiveness for empirical data. Samples of 529 were randomly selected from principals and teachers at private schools. The finding revealed that entrepreneurial leadership of private school principals had no direct effect on school effectiveness but had been mediated by school culture and teacher’s organizational citizenship behavior significantly. Besides, entrepreneurial leadership of administrators, school culture, and organizational citizenship behavior jointly explained 57 percent of the variation in school effectiveness of private schools. The findings and implications of the study are also discussed. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bowers, A. J. (2010). Toward addressing the issues of site selection in district effectiveness research: A 2-level hierarchical linear growth model. *Educational Administration Quarterly, 46*(3), 395-425.

Denison, D. (1990). *Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness*. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

DiPaola, M. F., & Neves, P. C. (2009). Organizational citizenship behaviors in American and Portuguese public schools: Measuring the construct across cultures. *Journal of Educational Administration, 47*(4), 490-507.

DiPaola, C., Tarter, J., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Measuring organizational citizenship of schools: The OCB scale. In W. Hoy & C. Miskel (Eds.), *Educational leadership and reform* (pp. 319-341). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Dogan, S., & Adams, A. (2018). Effect of professional learning community on teachers and students: Reporting updated results and raising questions about research design. *School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29*(4), 634-659.

Fernald, L. W., Solomon, G. T., & Tarabishy, A. (2005). New paradigm: Entrepreneurial leadership. *Southern Business Review, 30*(2), 1-10.

Fidan, C., & Balci, A. (2016). Principal proactivity: School principals’ proactive behavior forms and their level of display. In S. S. Ercetin (Ed.), *Applied chaos and complexity theory in education* (pp. 29-58). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

Gardner, W. L. (2003). Perceptions of leader charisma, effectiveness, and integrity: Effect of exemplification, delivery, and ethical reputation. *Management Communication Quarterly, 16*(4), 502-527.

Gupta, V., MacMillan, I. C., & Surie, G. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: Developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. *Journal of Business Venturing, 19*, 241-260.

Jermsittiparsert, K., Sriyakul, T., Pamornmast, C., Rodboonsong, S., Boonprong, W., Sangperm, N., Pakvichai, V., Vipaporn, T., & Maneechote, K. (2016). A comparative study of the efficiency and effectiveness of primary education management between the Provincial Administrative Organisation and the Office of the Basic Education Commission: A service user satisfaction survey. *Modern Applied Science, 10*(7), 58-65.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). *Multivariate data analysis*. NJ: Prentice Hall.

Hamzah, M. S. G., Yusof, H. B., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Headmasters and entrepreneurship criteria. *European Journal of Social Sciences, 11*(4), 535-543.

Harrison, C., Paul, S., & Burnard, K. (2019). Entrepreneurial leadership: A systematic literature review. *International Review of Entrepreneurship, 14*(2), 235-264.

Hartinah, S., Suharso, P., Umam, R., Syazali, M., Lestari, B., Roslina, R., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Teacher’s performance management: The role of principal’s leadership, work environment and motivation in Tegal City, Indonesia. *Management Science Letters, 10*(1), 235-246.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). *Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice* (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Lau, T. L. M., Shaffer, M. A., Chan, K. F., & Man, T. W. Y. (2012). The entrepreneurial behavior inventory. *International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 18*(6), 673-696.

Lee, M., & Louis, K. S. (2019). Mapping a strong school culture and linking it to sustainable school improvement. *Teaching and Teacher Education, 81*, 84-96.

Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. *Educational Administration Quarterly, 46*, 671-706.

Menold, J., Jablokow, K., Purzer, S., Ferguson, D. M., & Phland, M. W. (2014). A critical review of measures of innovativeness. *121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition*.

Miller, P. W. (2018). *The nature of school leadership: Global practice perspectives*. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.

Mulaik, S. A., & Millsap, R. E. (2000). Doing the four-step right. *Structural Equation Modelling, 7*(1), 36-73.

NIST. (2019). *Baldrige excellence builder 2019-2020*. Retrieved from www.nist.gov/baldrige.

Okudan, G. E., & Rzasa, S. E. (2006). A project-based approach to entrepreneurial leadership education. *Technovation, 26*, 195-210.

Pihie, Z. A. L., Asimiran, S., & Bagheri, A. (2014). Entrepreneurial leadership practices and school innovativeness. *South African Journal of Education, 34*(1), 1-11.

Pihie, Z. A. L., & Bagheri, A. (2013). Self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention: The mediation effect of self-regulation. *Vocation and Learning, 6*, 385-401.

Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organization-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. *Journal of Applied Psychology, 94*(1), 122-141.

Renko, M., Tarabishy, A. E., Carsrud, A. L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. *Journal of Small Business Management, 53*(1), 54-74.

Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. *Educational Administration Quarterly, 44*, 635-674.

Ruvio, A., Rosenblatt, Z., & Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2010). Entrepreneurial leadership vision in nonprofit vs. for-profit organizations. *The Leadership Quarterly, 21*, 144-158.

Sammons, P., & Bakkum, L. (2011). Effective schools, equity and teacher effectiveness: A review to the literature. *Profesorado, 15*(3), 9-26.

Siriattakul, P., Jermsittiparsert, K., & Mustanir, A. (2019). What determines the organizational citizenship behavior in Indonesian agriculture manufacturing firms? *International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 23*(4), 778-792.

Somech, A., & Ron, I. (2007). Promoting organizational citizenship behavior in schools: The impact of individual and organizational characteristics. *Educational Administration Quarterly, 43*(1), 38-66.

Somech, A., & Khotaba, S. (2017). An integrative model for understanding team organizational citizenship behavior: Its antecedents and consequences for educational teams. *Journal of Educational Administration, 55*(6), 671-685.

Sowa, J. E., Selden, S. C., & Sanfort, J. R. (2004). No longer unmeasurable? A multidimensional integrated model of nonprofit organizational effectiveness. *Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33*(4), 711-728.

Trujillo, T. (2013). The reincarnation of the effective schools research: Rethinking the literature on district effectiveness. *Journal of Educational Administration, 51*(4), 426-452.

Uline, C., Miller, D. M., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). School effectiveness: The underlying dimensions. *Educational Administration Quarterly, 34*(4), 462-483.

Zijlstra, P. H. (2014). When is entrepreneurial leadership most effective? *Master of Sciences in Business Administration Thesis*. University of Twente.

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

How to Cite

Kongjinda, N. ., Niyamabha, A. ., Wichitpatcharaporn, W. ., Sakulthanasakdi Moore, K. ., & Koedsuwan, S. . (2020). Entrepreneurial Leadership of Private School Principals in Thailand: The Pathway to School Effectiveness through School Culture and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 6257-6266. https://doi.org/10.61841/we956p18