Conceptuality of Rational and managerial Rationality An Analytical Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/d381s417Keywords:
Rational and managerial Rationality, An Analytical StudyAbstract
Organizations and organizational behavior requirements are of distinct importance in managerial thought in general, inasmuch their association with the present of organizations and their desirable future in light of the unprecedented and rapid environmental challenges that are difficult to determine their effects on organizations. In this environment, the importance of highlighting the essential of some terms emerged in order to explain the decisions and actions that lead organizations and the extent of their effectiveness that are reflected in organizational actions in general. Among these terms is the term “rationality”, which has the main role in indicating the quality of behavior and decision-making in the same time, and what this term enjoys of extreme privacy, which is not only at the level of management science but rather for the rest of the sciences that reflect the dominant values and beliefs and what is related in this concern, the confusion and complexity in finding the correct concept for it. The current study comes to represent a serious attempt to focus on the philosophical aspects of this term through an analytical concentration of the views of the pioneers and philosophers in management and organizational thought and to answer the question related to what is rational or irrational in the world of organizations in general.
Downloads
References
1) Barringer, Rebuke and Ireland, R, 2008, Duare Entrepreneurial Successfully Launching New Ventures, 2ed,
Prentice Hill, 6-8.
2) Caiden, G, 1982, Rationality, Public Administration, Pacific Palisades,CA:Palisades Publishers,216-17.
3) Ericson, Joel&Thunberg, nils, 2006, Resources and Entrepreneurial Orientation Empirical Findings From the
Footwear Industry of Srylanka,Master Thesis within Business Administration ,Junketing International
Business School ,Junketing University,15.
4) Fiol,C.M&Connor,E.j&Aguinis,H.,The Development and Transfer of Power across Organizations Levels,
Academy of Management Reviewe,vol(29),42.
5) Gerth, H,&Mills,C,(Eds),1976,From Max Weber :Essay in Sociology, New York, Oxford University
Press ,214-16.
6) Harmon, M,&Mayer, T,1986,Organization Theory for Public Aministration,Boston:Little,Brown Company,75.
7) Harmon,M&Mayer,T,1986,Organization Theory For Public Administration,Boston:Little Brown and
Company,145.
8) Harrington, J, & Frank ,Voehl& Christopher,F,2015,Model For Sustainable Change,whitePaper,Article,Project
Management Journal,1.
9) Hartwing, R, 1978, Rationality and Problems of Administrative Theory, public Administration, 56(summer),
159-62.
10) HaschemiLoukia, 1987, Organization Psychology, Madrid, 1987, 101-27.
11) Kay,Aron,C,2002,Sour Grapes( Wants ),The Society for Personality and Social Psychology,Inc,Vol.28,No.9,10.
12) Mannheim, K, 1940, Men and Society in an Age of Reconstruction. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World,53-
59.
13) Michel, G, (Ed), 1979, A new Dictionary of The Social Science, New York, Aldine Mouzelis, 154.
14) Mohammed,Tariq Shareef,2000, Strategic Thinking Modes And Their Impact on The Selection Of Decision
Taking Approach,Thesis,IRAQ,Baghdad University,19-20.
15) Perez Velasco: 1985, Organizations Psychology,(Ed),Spain Psychology Org, ,Madrid,N(6),33.
16) Pfiffner, J, 1960, Administrative Rationality, Public Administration Review,20(Summer),126.
17) Quin&Mckenna, Eugene, 2000, Buisness Psychology and Organization Behavior a Student Hand Book, 3th,
415.
18) Ramos, A, 1981,The New Science of Organizations, Toronto, University of Toronto Press,166-72.
19) Samir asaadMurshid, 1989 , Rationality at the Modern managerial Thought, Kuwait University, The Education
Magzine,112.
20) Shein,E, 1970, Organizational Psychology, Englewood Cliffs,NJ, Prentice Hall,56-7.
21) Simon, H, 1973, Organization Man: Rational or Self Actualiztiong,Public Administration Review 33 (JulyAugust):346-35.
22) Skibbins, G, J, 1974, Organization Evaluation: A program for Managing hang Radical Change, American
Prentice- Hall,9.
23) Wheelen, Thomas L.&Hunger, J,David,2010,Concepts In Strategic Management and Business policy,
Achieving Sustainability, International Edition,12th ed,PearsonEducation,Inc, Upper Saddle River ,New
Jersy,America,186.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
