A Multimodal Analysis to the Construction of Identity in Online Dynamic Platform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/b16arx48Keywords:
an online identity, multimodality, Critical Discourse Analysis, Semiotic resourcesAbstract
This paper presents a semiotic analysis to the use of language in combination with nonlinguistic resources for identity construction. This study then, traces the role of those semiotic resources or mode of communication such as (texts, symbols, pictures and colors etc.) in Facebook profiles. Analytically, those modes will be conducted as direct self-representational devices to design and construct identity in online channel. The study explores not only the parallel strategies used in constructing identity, but also to understand how that/those resource(s) work closely together to construct that identity (ies) in online environment. In spite of the fast development of technology and new methods of communication, Facebook was chosen as it permeates our daily culture. Facebook is the most affordable and familiar online means of social communication. In order to achieve the aim(s) of this study, a multimodal analysis is presented set within the theoretical framework of ‘Critical Discourse Analysis’. Based on a quantitative analysis, this exploratory research investigates 120 male and 55 female students University Facebook’s profiles. All of underlying profiles are presented and analyzed in coded profile usernames. Results showed that these devices or semiotic resources were seen as sets of signs or systems combine to emerge semiotic choice as an active performance, by which each users creates meaning and carries cultural value and significance (i.e., identity). Meanwhile, the study also found that most of these profiles (identities) seem pretty much unstable (i.e., flexible) and differ from their real world specially in terms of name, age, sex, nationality. This can be attributed to a mistaken assumption that presenting a real identity could post private and intimate information in real world and then reflect their real identity the matter which may crash with users’ social, political, security and religious traditions and beliefs. Hopefully, these findings can give a better understanding to online identity construction within Iraqi culture.
Downloads
References
Buffardi, L. E., & Campbell, W. K. (2008). Narcissism and social networking web
sites. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 34(10), 1303-1314.
Canary, D. J., Cody, M. J., & Manusov, V. L. (2008). Interpersonal communication: A goals
based approach. Macmillan.
Fairclough, N (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language, London
and New York: Longman.
Goffman, E. (2002). The presentation of self in everyday life. 1959. Garden City, NY, 259.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Cohesion in English. Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). Language as social semiotic. The Discourse Studies Reader.
Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 263-272.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1978) Language as Social Semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
Huspek, M. (1991). Norman Fairclough, Language and power. London and New York:
Longman, 1989, Pp. xii+ 259. Language in Society, 20(1), 131-137.
Iedema, R. (2003). Bureaucratic planning and resemiotisation. Language in performance, 47-70.
Ismail, S. (2010). An Evaluation of Students' Identity-Sharing Behavior in Social Network
Communities as Preparation for Knowledge Sharing. International Journal for the Advancement of Science & Arts, 1(1),14-21
KhosraviNik, M., & Unger, J. W. (2016). Critical discourse studies and social media: Power, resistance and critique in changing media ecologies. Methods of critical discourse studies, 205-33.
Kress, G. (1985). Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Victoria: Deakin University.
Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design.
Psychology Press.
Koole, M. (2010). The web of identity: Selfhood and belonging in online learning networks.
Seventh International Conference on Networked Learning 2010.
Nir, C. (2012). Identity construction on Facebook (Doctoral dissertation, Dissertation. The Institute of Art,Design and
Technology, Dun LaoghaireSchool of Creative Arts).
O’Halloran, K. (2011). Mathematical Discourse: Language, Symbolism and Visual Images.
London: Continuum.
Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality, and interpersonal relationships: As
developed in the client-centered framework (Vol. 3, pp. 184-256). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Shafie, L. A., Nayan, S., & Osman, N. (2012). Constructing identity through facebook profiles:
Online identity and visual impression management of university students in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 65, 134-140.
Shafie, L. A., Mansor, M., Osman, N., Nayan, S., & Maesin, A. (2011). Privacy, trust and social
network sites of university students in Malaysia. Research Journal of International Studies, 20, 154-162.
Salimkhan, G., Manago, A. M., & Greenfield, P. M. (2010). The construction of the virtual self
on MySpace. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1).
Siibak, A. (2009). Constructing the self through the photo selection-visual impression
management onsocial networking websites. Cyberpsychology: Journal of psychosocial research on
cyberspace, 3(1).
Tingstad, V. (2003). Children's chat on the net: a study of social encounters in two Norwegian
chat rooms. Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap og teknologiledelse.
Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social
network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(1), 20-36.
Thurlow, C., & Mroczek, K. (Eds.). (2012). Digital discourse: Language in the new media.
Oxford University Press on Demand.
Van Leeuwen, T., & Jewitt, C. (Eds.). (2001). The handbook of visual analysis. Sage.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis.
Oxford University Press.
van Leeuwen, T. (1985) ‘Rhythmic structure of the film text’, in Teun van Dijk (ed.), Discourse
and Communication – New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication. Berlin:
de Gruyter.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Rutledge.
van Dijk, T. (2004). “Critical Discourse Analysis” D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, &H. E. Hamilton
(Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 352-71). Oxford: Blackwell.
van Dijk, (1995 “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis,” Japanese Discourse, vol. 1. 17-27
Wodak, Cillia, Reisigl, and Liebhart (1999). The Discursive Construction of National Identity, trans. Angelika Hirsch, Richard Mitten and J. W. Unger, Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
Wodak, R. (2009). The semiotics of racism: A critical discourse-historical analysis. Discourse, of
course: An overview of research in discourse studies, 311-326.
Weiss and Wodak (2003). Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
