Improvement of Student Reasoning Skills through the Development Model of Advance Organizer on Open Ended Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/bf2k6907Keywords:
Reasoning skills, advance organizer model based open-ended approach, fractionAbstract
Improving students' reasoning skills can be gained by improving the quality of learning oriented to higher-order thinking skills. Development of learning models is very necessary to improve students' reasoning skills. The purpose of this study is to produce a learning model that can enhance students' reasoning skills in mathematics in elementary school. The research approach used in development research consists of a preliminary stage, a development phase and a testing phase. Based on the analysis of research, it is inferred that: (1) It is necessary to develop a learning model oriented to students' reasoning skills in elementary schools, namely an advanced organizer model based on an open-ended approach, (2) the resulting development model meets the content validity with valid criteria, and validity constructs with very valid criteria, practicality of the advanced organizer model with very valid criteria, (3) an advanced organizer model based on an open-ended approach is effective for improving elementary school students skills on reasoning. The development is carried out to improve the reasoning skills as they are important in learning mathematics.
Downloads
References
[1] Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016). Minister of Education and Culture Regulation number 22 regarding Basic and Secondary Education Process Standards. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.
[2] Ariyana, Y., et al. (2019). The learning handbook is oriented to higher order thinking skills. Jakarta: Directorate General of Teachers and Education Personnel Ministry of Education and Culture.
[3] Sadiq, F. (2008). Reasoning, problem solving and communication in learning mathematics. Yogyakarta: Department of National Education Center for Teacher Upgrading (Mathematics Upgrading).
[4] Astawan, I. G., Sudana, D. N.. Kusmariyatni, N., & Japa, I. G. N. (2019). The STEAM integrated panca pramana model in learning elementary school science in the industrial revolution era 4.0. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(5), 26-39.
[5] Suharnan. (2005). Cognitive psychology. Surabaya: Heroine.
[6] Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories and educational perspective. Boston: Pearson.
[7] Fisher, A. (2009). Critical thinking is an introduction. Jakarta: Erlangga.
[8] Fauzan, L. (2019). Professional identity of middle school counsellors in East Java, Indonesia, and the development efforts. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(5), 60-72.
[9] Arianto, A. S., Sulianto, J., Azizah, M. (2019). Analysis of mathematical reasoning abilities of fourth grade students at SD N Gayamsari 02 in the city of Semarang. Synectic Journal, 2 (2), 136-149.
[10] Hidayati, K., N. (2013). Improving students' mathematical reasoning abilities through the learning cycle learning model "5e" by using teaching aids on grade V students of SDN Mudal 03 boyolali. Accessed from http://eprints.ums.ac.id/23192/17/11._ scriptpublikasi.pdf
[11] Nashihah, D., Sulianto, J., & Untari, M., A., U. (2019). Classification of mathematical reasoning abilities of fourth grade students of SD Negeri Tambakrejo 02 Semarang. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review. 2 (2). 203-209.
[12] Hidayatullah, M., S., Sulianto, J., Azizah, M. (2019). Reasoning ability analysis in terms of mathematical
problem solving abilities. Thinking Skills and Creativity Journal. 2 (2), 93-102.
[13] Pamungkas, T., Alamsyah, & Turmudi. (2016). The ability to think critically and creatively as well as students' mathematical self-esteem through the advanced organizer model. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1 (2),119-128.
[14] Parjayanti, A. D., & Wardono. (2013). Comparative study of learning models between inquiry and advance organizer for mathematical reasoning. Kreano Journal, 4 (1), 64-72.
[15] Savuanov, I & Ovsyannikova, I. (2014). Paradigm of the "open-approach" method in mathematics teaching: Focus on mathematical problem solving. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 23 (2), 32–37.
[16] Triawan, E & Zanthy, L., S. (2019). Improving the Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Grade X
Vocational Students through the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) Approach. Journal On Education, 1 (3),
507-514.
[17] Saleh, M., Prahmana, R.C.I., Isa, M., & Murni. (2018). Improving the Reasoning Ability of Elementary
School Students through the Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9 (1),
41-54.
[18] Namira, Z., B., Kusumo, E., & Prasetya, A., T. (2004). The Effectiveness of Metacognitive Strategies
aided by Advance Organizer to Improve Student Chemistry Learning Outcomes. Journal of Chemical Education
Innovation, 8 (1), 1271-1280.
[19] Imai, T. (2000). The influence of overcoming fixation in mathematics towards divergent thinking in openended mathematics problems on Japanese junior high school students. International Journal of Mathematical
Education in Science and Technology, 31 (2), 187-193.
[20] Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
[21] Dell'Ollio, J., M., Donk, T. (2007). Models of teaching: Connecting student learning with standartds.
London: SAGE Publication.
[22] Becker, J., P., & Shimada, S. (2005). The open ended approach: A new proposal for teaching mathematics.
Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
[23] Yumiati & Noviyanti, M. (2017). Abilities of Reasoning and Mathematics Representation on Guided
Inquiry Learning. Journal of Education and Learning. 11 (3), 283-290.
[24] Putra, F. G., et al. (2018). The implementation of advance organizer models on mathematical
communication skills in terms of learning motivation. Tadris: Journal of Education and Teaching Training, 3 (1),
41-46.
[25] Baig, S & Halai, A. (2006). Learning mathematical rules with reasoning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2 (2), 15-33.
[26] Priatna, N. (2003). Reasoning Ability and Understanding of Mathematics in Class 3 Students of State Junior High School Bandung. Unpublished Dissertation. Bandung: UPI Postgraduate Program.
[27] Napitupulu, E., E., Suryadi, D., & Yaya, S. Kusumah. (2016). Cultivating Upper Secondary Students' Mathematical Reasoning-Ability and Attitude Towards Mathematics Through Problem-Based Learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7 (2), 117-128.
[28] Huda, S., Kharisma, H., N., Qoma, I., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). How can Mathematical Reasoning Abilities be improved ?: A Study Case at Islamic Boarding School. Decimal: Journal of Mathematics, 3 (1), 1-6.
[29] Rasmussen, C., & Marrongelle, K. (2006). Pedagogical Content Tool: Integrating Student Reasoning and Mathematics in Instruction. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 37 (5), 388-420.
[30] Rahayu, S., Widodo, A., T, & Supartono. (2010). Development of an Advance Organizer Learning Model to Increase Student Activities and Learning Outcomes. Journal of Chemical Education Innovation, 4 (1), 497-505.
[31] Tasiwan, Nugroho, S., E., & Hartono. (2010). Analysis of the level of Student Motivation in ScienceBased Advance Organizer Model Project-based Learning. Indonesian Natural Sciences Education Journal, 3 (1), 43-50.
[32] Alamsyah, T., P., & Turmudi. (2016). Critical and Creative Thinking Abilities and Student's Mathematical Self-Esteem through the Advance Organizer Model. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1 (2), 119-128.
[33] Yusuf, M., Zulkardi., & Saleh, T. (2009). Development of Open-Ended Problems in the Subjects of Triangle and Quadrilateral in Middle School. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3 (2), 48-56.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
