A STUDY ON THE PLAYS OF GIRISH KARNAD AND VARIOUS SYMBOLS USED IN HIS PLAYS

Authors

  • Dinesh Kumar Sharma Guru Kashi University, Talwandi Sabo Author
  • Japneet Kaur Guru Kashi University, Talwandi Sabo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/gmrw7p27

Keywords:

Literature, Human, Playwright, Cultural,Emotional

Abstract

 GirishRaghunath Karnad is regarded as one of the best dramatists in Indo Anglian literature, and is
known for his adaptability. He is a cultural administrator, translator, critic, director, actor, poet, and
dramatist, among other things. Karnad has received widespread appreciation for his complex portrayal
of topics in his plays, which examine existential issues and the human condition. Karnad's use of a variety
of dramatic devices adds to the innovative merging of Indian reason with western emotive culture in his
plays. A careful examination of Karnad's emotional devices in his major plays reveals the playwright's
elegant realism and inventiveness, and allows the reader to derive new meanings from the texts 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ankur, Devender Raj. “Indian Theatre:

Inheritance, Transitions and Future

Options.” Press Bureau of India. n.d.

Web. 12 Apr. 2016.

2. Ashley, N.P. “Effacing Hayavadana: On

the Masks of the Text.” Mukherjee 172-

80

3. Bansal, Anupam, and Satish Kumar

“Emancipating Women: A Note on

Women Empowerment in

GirishKarnad’sNāga-Mandala” Khatri

and Arora 158- 63

4. Chakraborty, Kaustav, ed. Indian Drama

in English. New Delhi: PHI, 2011. Print.

5. Chari, Jaganmohana.

“Karnad’sHayavadana and NāgaMandala: A Study in Postcolonial

Dialectics.” Pandey, Barua and Dhawan

177-83.

6. Coe, Richard N. The Vision of Jean

Genet: A Study of his Poems, Plays and

Novels. New York: Grove, 1968. Print.

7. Collellmir, Dolors. “Mythical Structure

in GirishKarnad’sNāga-Mandala”

EdicionsiPublicacions de la Universitat

de Barcelona (1995): 1-9. Print.

8. Dahiya, Jyoti. “Nāga-Mandala: A Story

of Marriage and Love.” Galaxy:

International Multidisciplinary Research

Journal 2.5 (2013): 1-4. Print.

9. Dalmiya, Vasudha. Poetics, Plays and

Performances: The Politics of Modern

Indian Theatre. New Delhi: Oxford UP,

2006. Print.

10. Das, Gulshan, and TanjeemAra Khan“Intertextuality and Retelling of Myths

in GirishKarnad’s The Fire and the

Rain” Khatri and Arora 195-202

11. Dharwadker, Aparna Bhargava.

“Introductio.” Karnad, Collected Plays:

Volume I vii-xxxvi.

12. Dhillon, Deepak. “Influence of

Brechtian Technique on GirishKarnad:

A study on Nāga-Mandala.” Language

in India 13.5 (2013): 192-209. Print.

13. Drishya, A Film Appreciation and

research Group. “GirishKarnad.”

Beadon Street. Web. 29 June 2010.

14. Ghanshyam, G.A. “Myths and Legends

in the Plays of GirishKarnad.” Language

in India 9 (2009): 323-28. Print.

15. Gorelik, M. “Brecht: I am the Einstein

of New Stage Form.” Theatre Art 41.3

(1957): 86. Print.

Downloads

Published

01.10.2024

How to Cite

Kumar Sharma, D., & Kaur, J. (2024). A STUDY ON THE PLAYS OF GIRISH KARNAD AND VARIOUS SYMBOLS USED IN HIS PLAYS. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 25(2), 1492-1500. https://doi.org/10.61841/gmrw7p27