Verifiable Ideal Guard Point Standard For Air Pollution: A Statistical Analysis

Authors

  • Praveen Kumar Bhatt Research Scholar, Department of Statistics, Sunrise University, Alwar, Rajasthan Author
  • Dr. Sudesh Kumar Department of Statistics, Sunrise University, Alwar, Rajasthan Author
  • Dr. Ankur Nehra Department of Mathematics, Dhanauri P.G. College, Dhanauri, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, 249404, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/mp3e8w65

Keywords:

SPRT, Operating Characteristic, Ideal Standard. Air pollution, Standard, Realizable standard, Statistically Verifiable Ideal Standard (SVIS), Exceedences

Abstract

 The Ideal Standard can be characterized as a proclamation about the number of inhabitants in toxin which is set with no strategy by which consistency is to be tried or screened. For instance, with the Best Standard, we can't register the likelihood that a specific checking site will be in control in the approaching year. Barnett and O'Hogan (1997) presented the idea of the Factual Obvious Ideal Norm (SVIS). The thought is to join the Optimal Norm with a genuinely based rule of execution. To this end, conventional factual apparatus might be utilized. We might utilize Neyman Pearson's Approach of Speculation testing to build SVIS. In this paper, we develop SVIS because of the Neyman Pearson Speculation testing system and research the Air Nature through SVIS. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Angus, J. E., 1994: Bootstrap one-sided confidence intervals for the lognormal mean. The Statistician 43, No. 3, pp.

395-401.

2. Baker, A. G., 1950: Properties of some tests of sequential analysis. Biometrika, 37, 334-346.

3. Barnett, V. and Bown, M. H., 2002: Best linear unbiased quantile estimators for environmental standards.

Environmetrics, 13 (3), 295-310.

4. Barnett, V. and Bown, M. H., 2002: Setting environmental standards: a statistical approach. Quantitative Methods in

Current Environmental Issues. Springer-Verlag, London, p99-109.

5. Beer, T., 2000: Setting air quality standards: a case study of the Australian National Environment Protection Measure

for Ambient Air Quality. Environmetrics, 11, 499-510.

6. Chami, P., Antoine, R. and Sahai, A., 2007: On Efficient Confidence Intervals for the log-normal mean. Journal of

Applied Sciences 7(13), 1790-1794.

7. Cox, L. H., 2000: Statistical issues in the study of air pollution involving airborne particulate matter. Environmetrics,

11,611-626.

8. Dupuis, D. J., 1998: Exceedances over high thresholds: a guide to threshold selection. Extremes 1:3; 251-261.

9. Finazzi, F., Scott, E. M. and Fasso, S., 2013: A model-based framework for air quality indices and population risk

evaluation, with an application to the analysis of Scottish air quality data. Appl. Statist. 62, Part 2, pp. 287-308.

10. Gilbert, R.O. (1987) Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

11. Gun A.M., Gupta M.K., and Dasgupta B. 2013: Fundamental of Statistics. World Press Private Ltd.

12. Guttorp, P., 2000: Environmental Statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 95, No. 449, pp.

289-292.

13. Guttorp, P.,2000. Setting environmental standards: a statistician’s perspective. National Research Center for Statistics

and the Environment, Technical Report, Number 48.

14. Krishnamoorthy, K. and Mathew, T., 2003: Inference on the means of lognormal distributions using generalized pvalues and generalized confidence intervals. J. of Statistical Planning and Inference 115, 103-

15. Land, C. E., 1971: Confidence intervals for the linear function of the normal mean and variance. Ann. Math. Statisti.

42, 1187-1205.

16. Land, C. E., 1972: An evaluation of approximate confidence interval estimation methods for lognormal means.

Technometrics 14, 145-158.

17. Land, C. E., 1973: Standard confidence limits for linear functions of the normal mean and variance. J. Am. Statist.

Assoc. 68, 960-963.

18. Lehmann, E.L., 1986: Testing of Statistical Hypothesis. John Wiley and Sons.

19. Martinez-Florez, G., Bolfarine, H. and Gomez, H. W., 2014: The log power normal distribution with application to

air pollution. Environmetrics, 25, 44–56.

20. Mood, A.M., Graybill F.A. and Boes, D.C. 2006, 5th reprint, Tata McGraw- Hill Publishing Company Limited, New

Delhi

21. Niwitpong, S. 2013: Confidence intervals for the mean of lognormal distribution with restricted parameter space.

App. Math. Sci., Vol. 7, No. 4, 161 – 166.

22. Olsson, U. 2005: Confidence intervals for the mean of a lognormal distribution. J. of Statistics Education, Vol. 13,

No. 1.

23. RaoM.N, and Rao HVN. 1989: Air pollution Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company Limited. New Delhi.

24. Rohatgi, V. K. and Saleh, A. K. 2008, 2nd Edition: An Introduction to Probability and Statistics. Wiley India Pvt Ltd.

25. Tanushree Shekhawat, Yashbir Singh., Air Quality of Jaipur City Based on Statistical Verifiable Ideal Standard

(SVIS), International Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences ISSN 0973-6077 Volume 13, Number 2 (2018), pp.

121-133.

26. Taralden, G., 2005: A precise estimator for the log-normal mean. Statsitical Methodology 2, 111-120.

27. Thompson, M.L., Cox, L.H., Sampson, P.D., and Caccia, D.C.,2000.

28. Varotsos, K. V., Tombrou, M. and Giannakopoulos, C., 2013.Statistical estimations of the number of future ozone

exceedances due to climate change in Europe. Journal of geophysical research atmosphere, vol. 118, issue: 12, pg:

6080-6099.

29. Wald and Wolfowitz, 1948: Optimum character of SPRT, Ann. Math.Stat., 19, 336-339.

30. Wald, A., 1947: Sequential Analysis. Wiley, New York.

31. Weerahandi, S. 1993: Generalized confidence intervals. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 88, 899-905.

32. Zhang, B. L., Guan, Y., Leaderer, B. P. and Holford, T. R., 2013: Estimating daily nitrogen dioxide level: exploring

traffic effects. The Annals of Applied Statistics, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1763-1777.

33. Zhou XH, Gao S. 1997: Confidence intervals for the log-normal mean. Statistics in medicine, vol. 16, 783-790, John

Wiley & Sons Ltd.

34. Zhou XH, Gao S., and Hui, S. L., 1997: Methods for comparing the means of two independent log-normal samples.

Biometrics 53, 1129- 1135

Downloads

Published

30.06.2023

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 3 (2023): 27 (3) 2023

Section

Articles

License

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Kumar Bhatt, P., Kumar, S., & Nehra, A. (2023). Verifiable Ideal Guard Point Standard For Air Pollution: A Statistical Analysis. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 27(3), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.61841/mp3e8w65