The Comparison of The Influence of Intellectual Capital, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership and Corporate Social Responsibility on Company Financial Performance (Empirical Study of Coal Mining and Infrastructure Sub-Sector Companies Registered
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/q1k78g70Keywords:
Intellectual Capital, Managerial Ownership, Institusional Ownership, Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial PerformanceAbstract
This study aims to compare the effect of intellectual capital, managerial ownership, institutional ownership and corporate social responsibility on the financial performance of coal mining sub-sectors and infrastructure sub-sectors. The samples used are all sub-sector coal mining companies and infrastructure sub-sectors which are listing year 2014-2018 on www.idx.co.id website using nonprobability sampling method with a census technique sampling which is the number of samples used are 37 coal mining and infrastructure sub-sector companies. The analytical method used is multiple regression. The results of hypothesis testing show that intellectual capital, managerial ownership, institutional ownership and corporate social responsibility have a significant effect jointly on ROA and ROE of coal mining sub-sector companies but does not significantly affect the company's ROE sub-sector infrastructure. Partially, managerial ownership affects insignificant financial performance in both sectors. Meanwhile, institutional ownership of coal mining companies has significant effect on ROA, but the effect is insignificant to the ROE and has no significant effect on the ROA and ROE infrastructure companies. Corporate social responsibility has a partially insignificant effect on ROA and ROE in the coal mining sub-sector but has a negative and significant effect on ROA in the infrastructure sub-sector.
Downloads
References
1 Agustina, W., Yuniarta, G. A., & Kadek, S. N. (2015). Pengaruh Intellectual Capital, Corporate Social
Responsibility dan Good Corporate Governance terhadap Kinerja Keuangan ( Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan BUMN yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada tahun 2011-2013 ). Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(1), 1–11.
2 Andreawan, A. (2013). Analisis Intellectual Capital, Mekanisme Corporate Governance Dan Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Financial Performance. Naskah Publikasi Ilmiah, Universitas Muhammadyah Surakarta, 1–15.
3 Aprina, D. (2012). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan yang Diukur Menggunakan Economic Value Added.
4 Ariantini, I. G. A., Yuniarta, G. A., & Sujana, E. (2017). Pengaruh Intellectual Capital, Corporate Socia
Responsibility, dan Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan (Studi Kasus Pada Perusahaan
Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015). Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(1), 1–11.
5 Atmadja, G. B. D., Irmadariyani, R., & Wulandari, N. (2019). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social
Responsibility Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan. E-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, VI(1), 127–134.
6 Clarabella, B. dan Tarigan, J. (2015) Kinerja Keuangan Melalui Struktur Modal Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada
Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Dalam Bursa Efek Indonesia ( Bei ). Business Accounting Review, 5,
625–34.
7 Dewi, K., & Monalisa. (2016). Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on Financial Performance with
Audit Quality as a Moderating Variable. Binus Business Review, 7(2), 149–155.
8 Endar Yunitasari. (2016). Pengaruh Modal Kerja Terhadap Likuiditas Dan Profitabilitas Perusahaan Sektor
Infrastruktur, Utilitas Dan Transportasi Di Be. Pengaruh Modal Kerja Terhadap Likuiditas Dan Profitabilitas
Perusahaan Sektor Infrastruktur, Utilitas Dan Transportasi Di Bei.
9 Fathi, S., Farahmand, S., & Khorasani, M. (2013). Impact of Intellectual Capital on Financial Performance in the
Pharmaceutical Industry in Iran. International Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 2(1), 6–17.
10 Gunawan, A., & Wahyuni, S. F. (2013). Pengaruh Rasio Keuangan terhadap Pertumbuhan Laba pada Perusahaan
Perdagangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 13(01 2013).
11 Hermiyetti dan Erlinda, K. (2016) Analisis Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional,
Kepemilikan Asing, Dan Komite Audit Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan. Media Riset Akuntansi, Vol 6, No.,
1–19.
12 Ikhwazahmi, U. (2014). Pengaruh Intellectual Capital, Good Corporate Governance, dan Corporate Social
Responsibility terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Indeks LQ45 BEI TAHUN 2010-2012.
ETD Unsyiah.
13 Inkinen, H. (2015). Review of Empirical Research on Intellectual Capital and Firm Performance. Journal of
Intellectual Capital, 16(3), 518–565.
14 Khasanah, A. N. (2016). Pengaruh Intelektual Capital dan Islamicity Performance Index Terhadap Kinerja
Keuangan Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Nominal, V(6), 1–18.
15 17. Koszewska, M., Bielecki, M. 2020. How to make furniture industry more circular? The role of component
standardisation in ready-to-assemble furniture. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 1688-1707.
16 Masriwilyana. (2017). Pengaruh Intellectual Capital dan CSR terhadap Kinerja Keuangan pada Perusahaan
Manufaktur yang Listing di BEI. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
17 Nilayanti, M. dan Suaryana, I.G.N.A. (2019) Pengaruh Kepemilikan Manajerial dan Kepemilikan Institusional
Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Dengan Kebijakan Deviden Sebagai Pemoderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 26,
906. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v26.i02.p03
18 Nimtrakoon, S. (2014). The Relationship between Intellectual Capital , Firms’ Market Value and Financial
Performance: Empirical Evidence from Asian Countries. University of The Thai Chammber of Commerce, 64.
19 Nurhidayati, W. (2013). Pengaruh Kepemilikan Institusional, Kepemilikan Manajerial, Komite Audit, Komisaris Independen terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar pada Indeks LQ45.
20 Pratiwi, T. R. (2017). Pengaruh Intellectual Capital Dan Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Di Indonesia. 8(1).
21 Puspitasari, E. (2014). Peran Indikator Kekayaan Intelektual terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di BEI. 3(2), 1–12.
22 Rendy. (2013). Pengaruh Intellectual Capital Pada Nilai Perusahaan Dengan Kinerja Keuangan Sebagai Variabel
Intervening. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 1717. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v26.i03.p02
23 Rilla. (2016) Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Manufaktur yang
Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2008-2014. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 3, 19–32.
https://doi.org/10.24815/jdab.v3i2.5384
24 Rosafitri, C. (2017). Interaksi Good Corporate Governance , Corporate Social Responsibility , Intellectual Capital
Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan Citra Rosafitri Abstrak Pendahuluan Perusahaan
merupakan tempat dimana para pemangku kepentingan baik para. 1(1), 1–20.
25 Sagitaningrum, D., & Frisko, D. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility: Keterkaitan Letak Geografis Terhadap
Desain Program dan Pelaporan Perusahaan. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 18(3), 43.
https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v18i3.283
26 Sawarjuwono, T., & Kadir, A. P. (2003). Intellectual Capital: Perlakuan, Pengukuran dan Pelaporan. Jurnal
Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 5 No 1, 35–57.
27 Sirapanji, O., & Hatane, S. E. (2015). Pengaruh Value Added Intellectual Capital Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Dan
Nilai Pasar Jasa Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2008 – 2013. Business Accounting Review, 3(1),
45–54.
28 Ślusarczyk, B., Haseeb, M., & Hussain, H. I. (2019). Fourth industrial revolution: a way forward to attain better
performance in the textile industry. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 11(2), 52-69.
29 Soetedjo, S., & Safrina Mursida. (2014). Pengaruh Intellectual Capital Terhadap KinerjaKeuangan Pada Perusahaan
Perbankan. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVII.
30 Soufyan, D. A. (2014). Pengaruh Intellectual Capital, Corporate Governance dan Corporate Social Responsibility
terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di BEI. ETD Unsyiah.
31 Sudiyanto, Y. (2016). Pengaruh Kepemilikkan Institusional dan Kepemilikkan Manajerial terhadap Manajemen
Laba dan Konsekuensinya Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Universitas Bengkulu.
32 Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. PT Alfabet.
33 Tatibekova, A., Bubeyev, M. 2020. How regulation of bank capital adequacy and liquidity affects pricing of bonds
of the banks. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(3), 1708-1722.
34 Ulum, I., & Jati, A. W. (2016). Intellectual Capital Performance: A Comparative Study between Financial and
Non-Financial Industry of Indonesian Biggest Companies. 6(4), 1436–1439.
35 Vani, E. (2016). Pengaruh Kepemilikkan Manajerial Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Universitas Sanata Dharma.
36 Vira, A. N., & Wirakusuma, M. G. (2019). Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Pada Nilai
Perusahaan Dengan Good Corporate Governance Sebagai Pemoderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 26, 1299.
https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2019.v26.i02.p17
37 Waskito, T. (2014) Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikkan Manajerial, Kepemilikkan Institusional, dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Kinerja Keuangan. Jurnal Muhammadiiyah Surakarta,.
38 Wijayanti, I., Nur, D., & B, G. (2016). Analisis Nilai Perusahaan pada Sektor Pertambangan Batubara di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Ekuilibrium : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Ilmu Ekonomi, 11, 107.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
