Modern Types of Tests and Testing system in Uzbekistan

Authors

  • Mukaddas Bokiyeva Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers, Tashkent, Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/502pfg34

Keywords:

Achievement, Diagnostic, Placement Tests, Proficiency, Improving Language Skills.

Abstract

This article categorizes language tests according to their purpose, function and important distinguishing characteristics as well as demonstrates the representative samples of each kind of test processes in Uzbekistan.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Heaton, J.B. Classroom Testing. Longman Publishing: New York, 1990.

[2] Hughes A. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1989.

[3] Madsen S.H. Techniques in Testing. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1983.

[4] Dudley-Evans, T. & St John M.J. Developments in English for Specific Purposes. A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press. 1998

[5] Strevens P.ESP after twenty years: A re- appraisal. In M.Ticko (Ed.), ESP: State of the art (1-13).

SEAMEO Regional Language Centre. 1988

[6] Matukhin, D.L., Nizkodubov, G.A., Zyubanov, V.Y., Khasanshin, Y.R., Obskov A.V. (2014). Methodological Basics of Blended Learning in Teaching English for Academic Purposes to Engineering Students. Asian SocialScience. Vol. 10, P 97-102.

[7] Shaturnaya, E.A. Methods of teaching foreign language professional discourse by means of training-speech situations and roleplaying. PhD thesis (Education), Tambov. 2009

[8] Teaching Russian at school. M, 2004.

[9] E.A. Bystrov. Approaches and principles of teaching the Russian language. In the book: Teaching Russian language. M., 2004

[10] Andrew Gillies, Conference Interpreting: A Student's Practice Book, Routledge, 2013

[11] D. Seleskovitch Language Interpretation and Communication, New York, Plenum Press, 1978. Internet resources

[12] Bailey K. M. Language teacher supervision: A case-based approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. 2006.

[13] Cullen R. The use of lesson transcripts for developing teachers’ classroom language. // H. Trappes-Lomaz,

G. Ferguson (eds.). Language in language teacher education. Amsterdam. The Netherlands: John Benjamins. 2002. pp. 219–235.

[14] Khamhi-Stein L. D. Teacher preparation and non-native English speaking educators. // A. Burns, J. C. Richards (eds.). The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2009. pp. 91–101.

[15] Lavender S. Towards a framework for language improvement within short inservice teacher development programmes. // H. Trappes-Lomaz, G. Ferguson (eds.). Language in language teacher education. Amsterdam. The Netherlands: John Benjamins. 2002. pp. 237–250.

[16] Medgyes P. When the teacher is a non-native speaker. // M. Celcie-Murcia (ed.). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. 3rd ed. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. 2001. pp. 415–427.

[17] Seidlhofer B. Double standards: Teacher education in the expanding circle. World Englishes. #18 (2). 1999.

pp. 233–45.

[18] Karimov I.A. The Decree of the President of Uzbekistan PD-1875 “On measures to further improves system of foreign languages teaching” December 10. 2012.

[19] Hoven, D. Instructional design for multimedia: Towards a learner-centred CELL (Computer-Enhanced Language Learning) model. In K. A. Murphy-Judy (Ed.), NEXUS: The convergence of language teaching and research using technology, pp. 98-111. Durham, NC: CALICO, 1997

[20] Felix, U. (1995). Theater Interactive: multimedia integration of language and literature. On-CALL 9, 12-16.

Downloads

Published

30.06.2020

How to Cite

Bokiyeva , M. (2020). Modern Types of Tests and Testing system in Uzbekistan. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 4824-4828. https://doi.org/10.61841/502pfg34