THE EFFECT OF HUMAN CAPITAL, SOCIAL CAPITAL AND WORK ENVIRONMENT TO PRODUCTIVITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/rv11w064

Keywords:

human capital, social capital, work environment, productivity, doll’s industry

Abstract

 This study analyzes the competitiveness of Micro-Small-Medium Enterprises (SMEs) of doll industrial sector in West Java Province which is influenced by human capital, social capital, work environment, and productivity. The aim of this research is to know and analyze the influence of human capital, social capital, work environment directly to productivity. This research was using a survey method with a quantitative approach. The unit of analysis of this study is the doll industrial sector in West Java Province, with entrepreneurs as a unit of observation, namely a population of 191 entrepreneurs and a sample of 128 entrepreneurs. Data were obtained from survey results through questionnaires distributed to the entrepreneurs. Data were processed using statistical analysis and SEM-PLS analysis. The results showed that in the human capital, work environment, and productivity were tend to be high and social capital were tend to be low. Based on hypothesis testing, it is found that the human capital, social capital, and work environment have a positive effect on productivity; and that human capital, social capital, work environment, and productivity have a positive and significant effect on competitiveness, directly and indirectly 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong ,M Taylor ,M. (2014). Handbook of Human Resource Management practice. UK by Ashford Press Ltd.

Baker, W. (2000). Achieving Success through Social Capital: Tapping the Hidden Resources in Your Personal and

Business Networks. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Chen, Y. S., Lin, M. J. J., & Chang, C. H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity

on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing

Management, 38(2), 152-158.

Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2003). Human Resource Management, (South Western, OH).

Mayo, A. (2000). The role of employee development in the growth of intellectual capital. Personnel Review, 29(4),

521-533.

Opperman, R. (2002). User interface design. In: Adelsberger, H.H., Collis, B., Pawlowski, J.M. (eds.), Handbook on

information technologies for education and training. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 233–248.

Putti, J. M., Aryee, S., & Liang, T. K. (1989). Work values and organizational commitment: A study in the Asian

context.Human relations, 42(3), 275-288.

Snell, S., & Bohlander, G. (2013). Managing Human Resources. South-Western. Australia, Cengage Learning.

Stewart, T., & Ruckdeschel, C. (1998). Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. Performance

Improvement, 37(7), 56-59.

Tsipouri, L. J. (2004). Theodore W. Schultz Innovation for European competitiveness and cohesion: opportunities and

difficulties of co-evolution.Science and Public Policy, 31(6), 465-474.

Y.Hendayana, Suryana. (2019). The Effect of Productivity and Innovation on the Competitiveness of Batik SMEs in

West Java Indonesia: ISSN 2636-9168,e-ISSN 0128-2603, GATR Enterprise.

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

How to Cite

THE EFFECT OF HUMAN CAPITAL, SOCIAL CAPITAL AND WORK ENVIRONMENT TO PRODUCTIVITY. (2020). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 2628-2635. https://doi.org/10.61841/rv11w064