Digital Content Model as A Basis of Connectives Knowledge Learning For Digital Society

Authors

  • Feri Sulianta The Department of Informatics Widyatama University Bandung,Indonesia Author
  • Sapriya The Department of Civic Education Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Bandung,Indonesia Author
  • Nana Supriatna The Department of Social Studies Education Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Bandung,Indonesia Author
  • Disman The Departement of Economics Education Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Bandung,Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/rqwvg765

Keywords:

Connectivism, Civics Competency, Digital Literacy, Digital Content Model, Research and Development, Pre-Test And Post-Test, User Generated Content

Abstract

Today's learning for competency civics, is very dependent on information technology, which is a form of learning theory of Connectivity, where knowledge is no longer on individuals but outside individuals who are enabled by information technology devices that are able to manage knowledge and organize knowledge on complex cyber networks on the internet. Students and digital society today are very dependent on this type of learning, in getting information, managing, and storing or publishing information.

For this reason, a digital content model was developed using the research and development method proposed by Borg and Gall consists of ten steps, namely: research & study of literature, product design, design validation, product manufacture, initial product testing, product revision, product testing large scale, product revision, product specifications, and dissemination.

The model was created using six components, namely: Digital Media, Writing Method, Search Engine Optimization, Social Studies Education, Knowledge, Digital Copyright. Large-scale testing is compared from pre-test and post-test, while this teaching produces digital content reported on the User generated Content Platform. This digital learning is effective with achievement. The implementation of this digital content model shows a significant change regarding digital literacy competency which effectively increases digital literacy competence by 34.56% by approaching connectivity. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, P. & Dochy, Filip. (1995). Mapping Prior Knowledge: A Framework for Discussion among Researchers.

European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. 10, No. 3. Springer

Almasi, Mustapha. (2017). Internet Use Among Secondary Schools Students And Its Effects On Their Learning.

Proceedings Of Inted. Conference 6th-8th March. Valencia, Spain.

Al-Qallaf, C. L., & Al-Mutairi, A. S. R. (2016). Digital literacy and digital content supports learning. The Electronic

Library.

Anderson, L. (2013). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of

Educatioanl Objectives. Pearson. 2013. Page.77-81.

Art Silverblatt. (1995). Media Literacy: Keys to Interpreting Media Messages. London: Praeger.

As’ari, A. R. (2017). Tantangan Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru dalam Rangka Membelajarkan Matematika di Abad

ke-21 dan Membangan Karakter Peserta Didik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Mahasiswa Kerjasama Direktorat

Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kemendikbud 2016, (pp. 43-56).

Aufderheide, P., & Firestone, C. (1993). Media literacy: A report of the national

Azizinezhad, M. (2011). The use of blogs in teaching and learning translation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.

28 , 867 – 871.

Bawden, D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of documentation. 57(2), 218-259.

Bialo, Ellen. & Kachala, Jay. (1996). Interactive Educational Systems Design. The Effectiveness of Technology in

Schools: A Summary of Recent Research SLMQ Volume 25, Number 1, Fall 1996.

Borg, W.R. & Gall, M.D. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction, Fifth Edition. New York: Longman.

Buckingham, D. (2007). Digital Media Literacies: rethinking media education in the age of the Internet. Research in Comparative and International Education,2(1), 43-55.

Bonate, Peter. (2000). Analysis of Pretest – Posttest Design. Boca Raton London New York Washington DC. Chapman & Hall.

Bransford, J.(1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

C. Wyrwoll. (2014). User-Generated Content. Social Media. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden DOI 10.1007/978-3-658-06984-1_2.

Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA. Using Technology to Address Barriers to Learning. Dept. of Psychology, UCLA.

Clay, M. (2001). Change over time in children’s literacy development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann

Cogan, John. (1976). Social Studies Past Present Future. Educational Leadership.

Coiro. J. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. International Reading Association. Reading Research Quarterly Vol. 42, No.2.

Considine, D.M. (2002). Media literacy across the curriculum. Cable in the classroom: Thinking critically about media. Center for Media Literacy.

Costa, M. (2013) Choosing the Right Assessment Method: Pre-Test/Post-Test Evaluation, Boston University, Cabrillo Colleges.

Creswell, W John. (2010). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, United States

Davis, Charles H & Shaw,Debora. (2011). Introduction to information science and technology. Medford,NJ: Information Today.

Demirkaya, Hilmi. Ways of Effective Teaching and Learning in Social Studies in Context of Learning Climate Akdeniz.

University Faculty of Education New Approaches In Social Studies Education.

Dogruera. Nazan , Eyyamb. Ramadan, Menevisab, Ipek. (2011). The use of the internet for educational purposes. Elsevier.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 28 (2011) 606 – 611.

Elpira, Bella. (2018). Pengaruh Penerapan Literasi Digital Terhadap Peningkatan Pembelajaran Siswa di SMP Negeri 6

Banda Aceh. Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry.Banda Aceh.

Escoda, Ana. (2016). Digital Skills in the Z Generation: Key Questions for a Curricular Introduction in Primary School.

Comunicar, nº. 49, v. XXIV, 2016 | Media Education Research Journal.

Eysenbach, G. and Kohler, C. (2002). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the Internet.

Procendings AMIA Annual Fall Symposium.

Fitzgerald, Brian & Gao, Fuping . (2008). Copyright Law, Digital Content And The Internet In The Asia-Pacific. Sydney

University Press.

Friedman, Linda & Hershey, Friedman. (2008). The New Media Technologies: Overview And Research Framework.

Gall, M, D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational Research an Introduction; Third Edition. Pearson

Education. Amerika Serikat.

Gasser. Urs , Cortesi & Sandra , Malik. Youth and Digital Media: From Credibility to Information Quality. The Berkman

Center for Internet & Society Research Publication Series.

Ghosh, Arpita & McAfee, Preston. (2011). Incentivizing High-quality User-Generated Content. ACM. India.

Gilster, Paul. (1997). Digital Literacy. Wiley. Amerika Serikat.

Grabara, J., Husain, H.I., Szajt, M. (2020) Sustainable University Development through Sustainable HR and Corporate

Entrepreneurship: The role of Sustainable Innovation and Environment, Amfiteatru Economic, 22 (54), 480-495.

Gregurec. Iva , Grd.Petra . (2012) Search Engine Optimization (SEO): Website analysis of selected faculties in Croatia.

Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems.

Hagel, P (2012b). Establishing what is good practice in digital literacy development, assessment and evaluation for

graduate employability. Unpublished report, Deakin University Library, Victoria.

Hagel, P. (2012a). Towards an understanding of ‘Digtial Literacy(ies)’, Unpublished report. Deakin University Library,

Victoria.

Hague, C. (2010). Digital Literacy Across the Curriculum. FutureLab. United Kingdom.

Hairston, Maxine. (1997). A Handbook for Writers. Watson-Guptill Publications.

Hameed, S., Badii, A., & Cullen, A. J. (2008). Effective e-learning integration with traditional learning in a blended

learning environment. European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems.

Harsin, Jayson.(2018). Post-Truth and Critical Communication. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.

Hiller A. Spires & Paul, Casey. (2019). Digital Literacy for the 21st Century. IGI Global.

Hiller A. Spires a& Melissa E. Bartlett. (2012). Digital Literacies and Learning: Designing a Path Forward. The William

& Ida Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at the North Carolina State University College of Education.

Hobbs, Renee. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. The Aspen Institute Communications and Society

Program. Washington, D.C.: The Aspen Institute, November 2010.

Huber, G. P. & Daft, R.L. (1987). The information environments of organizations.

Hunt, Darwin. (2003). The concept of knowledge and how to measure it. Journal of Intellectual Capital Vol. 4 No. 1, 2003

pp. 100-113.

Hussien, A. S. (2014). Factors Affect Search Engine Optimization. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science

and Network Security, 28 VOL.14 No.9.

Jain, Ayush. (2013). The Role and Importance of Search Engine and Search Engine Optimization. International Journal of

Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science. India. hlm.99-103.

James, Potter. (2011). Media Literacy. Fifth Edition. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage Publication

Jones, Glenda. Westhuizen, Duan. (2013). Digital Literacy in the 21st Century: Fact or Fiction? Research Gate. hlm.12-17.

Kaur, Simranjeet & Kaur, Kiranbir Kaur. (2017). Search Engine Optimization Techniques with Website Perspective. International Arab Journal of e-Technology, Vol. 4, No. 3, January 2017.

Kay, K. T & Johnson. (1999).Research methodology: Taming the cyber frontier. Social Science Computer Review, 17, 323-337.

Downloads

Published

29.02.2020

How to Cite

Sulianta, F., Sapriya, Supriatna, N., & Disman. (2020). Digital Content Model as A Basis of Connectives Knowledge Learning For Digital Society. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 2483-2496. https://doi.org/10.61841/rqwvg765