Opposition Text Structure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/4j8zjp10Keywords:
Textual Organization, Oppositional Relations,, largeantonymy”, Antithesis,, ContrastAbstract
In analyzing the essays of Korean authors, it should be noted that in these works antonymy functions as one of the types of semantic-syntactic organization of the text, it, like contrast, according to G.V. Andreeva, can have a non-systematic character and enter the compositional structure of the text in the form of separate fragments of the meaning of the opposite, and can be a principle for constructing the text itself, can also concentrate on a specific section of the text as a combination of stylistic techniques. This fact reveals the applicability of the hypothesis E.A. Miller about the presence of a “largeantonymy” not only in any literary text, but also in the text of the essay. At the present stage, Korean scholars such as Ko Yong Geun, Kim Pong Sung, And Sam Hyun and others dealt with the problems of the text. In Kim Pong Sung's research on the principles of text construction, we find that one of the types of text connectivity is matching relationships (Pak Yong Sung explains that matching relationships in this case include comparison or contrast). The positive relations, expressed in the essays by Bobchon and Han Yong Un and others, characterize the specific character of the text and the personality of the author. For understanding the manifestation of antonymy, it is necessary to take into account the national mentality, culture of the people, their way of life, traditions, religion inherent in Korean society.
Downloads
References
[1] Chernyavskaya, V.E. (2009) Linguistics of the text: Polycoding, intertextuality, inter-discursiveness.
Moscow: Book House "LIBROCOM", p.16.
[2] Kim Hyang A. (2016). Textual Linguistic Study of Connection Adverbs. Focused on Lee Yun-ki's short stories. Seoul: Korea broadcasting National University, pp. 105-109.
[3] Lee Sam Hyeong. (1994). Content structure, analysis, method and educational application of descriptive text. Doct, Diss. Seoul: Seoul National University, p. 144
[4] Kim Bong Sun. (2005).Korean Language Education and Text Structure. Seoul: Seoul National University,
p. 47
[5] Park Yeong Sun. (2001).Korean sentence semantics. Seoul: Koryo University, pp. 194-195
[6] Tarasov, E.F.(1993) Language and consciousness: paradoxical rationality. Moscow: Institute of Linguistics,
pp. 6-15.
[7] Kim SeonKyeong. (2017). Korean as a foreign language. Busan: Busan National University, pp. 50-53
[8] Alefirenko, N. (2005). Controversial problems of semantics: Monograph. Moscow: Gnosis, p. 304
[9] Kim, G.N. (2001) History of religions of Korea. Almaty: KazNU named after al-Farabi, p. 230.
[10] Andreeva, G.V. (1984). The linguistic expression of contrast and its stylistic functions in fiction (based on English). Doct. Diss.Leningrad: Leningrad State Pedagogical Institute. A.I. Herzen, pp. 145-147.
[11] Miller, E.N. (1990).The nature of lexical and phraseological antonymy. Saratov: Saratov State University,
p. 222
[12] Klementsova, N.N. (1996). The semantic structure of the text and its understanding // Problems of semantics and pragmatics. Kaliningrad, pp. 45-49.
[13] Kim KwangHae, Kwon Chae Il, Lim JiRyong, Kim Mu Rim, Lim Ch’ilSeong. (2003). Korean Knowledge Exploration. Seoul: Park Lee Jong, p. 495
[14] Cheon Lee Du.(1989).Between life and dreams. Seoul: Cultural history Cheong Han, pp. 119-120
[15] Bobcheong.(2010). Collection of law-2. One for all and all for one.Seoul: Literature forest, p. 371
[16] Jerebilo, T.V. (2007). Text analysis // Lingua-universum, 4, pp. 43-48.
[17] Lim Jong Dae. (1998). Buddhist story’s humor. Seoul: Future culture history, p. 97.
[18] Bakhtin, M.M. (1986).Aesthetics of verbal creativity.The problem of the text in linguistics, philology and other humanities. The experience of philosophical analysis. Moscow: Art, pp. 290-325.
[19] Mann T. Dr. Faustus. (1960). Сollected works. СhapterXxv. Volume 5. Moscow: Imaginative literature, pp. 319-320.
[20] Kolshansky, G.V. (2005). An objective picture of the world in cognition and language. Ed. 2nd, add. Moscow: URSS editorial, p. 26.
[21] Leontiev, A.A. (1976). Principles and methods of semantic research: Psycholinguistic aspect of linguistic meaning. Moscow, pp. 46-72.
[22] Krasnykh, V.V. (2002). Ethno psycholinguistics and linguistics cultural science. Lecture course. Moscow: Gnosis, p.21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
