A Causal Model of Good Citizenship Behavior in the Democratic Way of Youth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/8ag2pc07Keywords:
Causal Model, Good Citizenship, Democracy, Youth in CommunityAbstract
Behavior of Reverence, Behavior of Fellowship, and Behavior of Intelligence are important to youth who are good citizenship in democratic way. The purpose of this study is to study the direct and indirect influence of Psychological Traits, Situations, and Psychological States related to Good Citizenship Behavior in Democratic Way. The sample group in this study was 480 youth. The data was collected for SPSS and LISREL analysis for statistical testing and hypothesis testing. The results showed that democratic behavior in democratic way was directly influenced by causal variables which were psychological states which consisted of Positive Attitude towards Good Citizenship Behavior in Democratic Way, and Mental Immunizing. In addition, causal variables include the psychological traits consisting of, Future Orientation/Self-Control, Belief in internal Locus of Control of Reinforcement, Need for Achievement, Mental Health, and Situations consisting of Social Norms, Role Model from Others, Parenting with Love, Support and Reason, Role Model from Media have an indirect influence on good citizenship behavior in democratic way through variables of psychological states and the psychological traits have a direct influence on the situations.
Downloads
References
1. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Phycology, 52, 27-58.
2. Bhanthumnavin, D. (2004). How can Leaders Develop Psychological Trait for Future-Orientation and Locus of Control to Subordinates? “Research Productivity of Thai Behavior System to solve problems and develop youths” (Seminar Report). Bangkok: National Research Council of Thailand.
3. Bhanthumnavin, D. (2008). Synthesis of Research on Moral and Ethics in Thailand and Foreign Country. Bangkok: Moral Promotion Center.
4. Bhanthumnavin, D. (2013). Antecedents of Mindful Risk-Taking Behavior in Secondary School Students (Research report). Bangkok: National Research Council of Thailand.
5. Bhanthumnavin, D., & Bhanthumnavin, D. (2016). Psychosocial Inequality of Research Opportunity as a Key Predictor of Efficiency in Research of Thai Academicians. Bangkok: National Research Council of Thailand.
6. Bissing-Olson, M. J., Fielding, K. S., & Iyer, A. (2016). Experiences of Pride, Not Guilt, Predict Pro Environmental Behavior When Pro-Environmental Descriptive Norms Are More Positive.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 145-153.
7. Boonkeaw, S. (2013). Psychological Factors Related to Volunteer Behavior of the Thai Red Cross Youth Volunteers in Bangkok (master’s thesis), Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok.
8. Chancharoen C. (2012). Psycho-social factors related to public mind behavior of students in muang lopburi district Lopburi province (master’s thesis), Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok.
9. Chumsai Na Ayutthaya, A. (2010). Knowledge must go hand in hand with virtue. Bangkok: FreeMind.
10. Hassan, R., Basri, R., & Asimiran, S. (2020). Relationship between Perceived Organizational Support and Citizenship Behavior of Academic Staff in Malaysian Research Universities. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (6), 2330-2344.
11. Jalanukroh, S. (2009). Psychosocial Correlates of Moral-Work Behavior of Health Center Chiefs (master’s thesis). National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok.
12. King Prachadhipok’s Institute. (2012). Proceeding of King Prachadhipok’s Institute Conference 13th 2012, Citizenship and the Future of Thai Democracy Vol.1. Bangkok: King Prachadhipok’s Institute.
13. Klaykaew, K. K. (2014). The Role of Families on the Fostering and Development of Children Becoming Good Citizens in a Democratic Society. Journal of Behavioral science, 20(1), 1-18.
14. Klaykeaw, K.K. (2016). The Influences of Socialization and Psychological Characteristics on Good Democratic Citizenship Behavior of bachelor's degree Students. Journal of Behavioral Science for Development, 8(2), 209-231
15. Nuansakul, S. (2000). Politics and Government. Department of Government, Faculty of Political Science, Rajamhaeng University, Bangkok.
16. Romero, C. D., Olmedo, R. & Santos, Z. (2020). Family and Adolescent Values Practice in School Environment. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24 (2), 560-567.
17. Siriyanun, S., Mukem, A., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Bridging workplace democracy and supply chain integration through involment of human resource practices. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(5), 685-696.
18. Soonthornpipit, H., Yama, A., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). Workplace democracy and supply chain dynamics in Thailand: Mediating role of employee voice. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 8(5), 673-684.
19. Taewanarumitkul, P. (2012). Civic Education. Bangkok: Aksorn sampan press.
20. Tansiri, W. (2008). Cultural Citizenship. Bangkok: Institute of Public Policy Studies.
21. Tantisulthorn, T. (2011). Thai Civic Education. Bangkok: Institute of Public Policy Studies.
22. Thongkamnerd, N. (2011). Psycho-social as Correlates of Water Resource Conservation Behavior of Secondary School Students in The Co-Heart for Revitalizing the Saensaeb Canal Project. (Master’s thesis), National Institute of Development Administration, Bangkok.
23. Wilaem, W. (2012). Model of Causal and Effective Factors of Good Citizenship Behavior in Democracy: Multiple Group Analysis. (Doctoral dissertation), Burapha University, Chonburi.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
