The Development of Knowledge Management Model in Supervision, Monitoring and Evaluation of Educational Management of the Primary Education Service Area Office
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/kr6v9104Keywords:
Model Development, Knowledge Management, Supervision Monitoring and EvaluationAbstract
The purpose of this research was to develop the knowledge management model in supervision, monitor and evaluate educational management of the Primary Education Service Area Office including to evaluate the application of the knowledge management model in supervision, monitor and evaluate educational management of the Primary Education Service Area Office. This study was conducted with research and development with 3 phases of implementation, namely: Phase 1 Study of current conditions, problems and needs; Phase 2 Development of the knowledge management model in supervision; and Phase 3 Evaluation of applying the knowledge management model in supervision. The findings indicated that the knowledge management model in supervision, monitor and evaluate educational management of the Primary Education Service Area Office consists of 2 steps which are knowledge building; knowledge gathering; knowledge applying; knowledge sharing and exchanging; and knowledge evaluation. Framework of supervision, monitoring and educational evaluation comprises 5 aspects, namely: research system; supervision system; learning resource and innovative media systems; facilitation system; and participation system. The implementation plan features an action meeting for studying the current conditions, problems and needs; defining teams based on learning; activity implementation in accordance with the knowledge management handbook; seminar on implementation summary and revision of knowledge base; and presentation of implementation of each knowledge base. The evaluation of consistency, suitability, feasibility on practice and usefulness of the knowledge management in supervision was at the highest level. In addition, the evaluation of applying the knowledge management in supervision gained efficiency of process and effectiveness of the result as 85.44/80.25. The research team had satisfaction towards the implementation at the highest level.
Downloads
References
1. Jiradechakun, K. (2007). Handbook for School Supervision. Bangkok: Than Aksorn. Chansombat, C. (2007). Development of Knowledge Management Model for Community Organizations. Ph.D. thesis. Educational Administration and Development Program Faculty of Education
Maha Sarakham University.
2. Chansombat, C. (2010). Knowledge Management and School Administration to Learning Organization. Maha Sarakham: Faculty of Education Maha Sarakham University.
3. Runcharoen, T. (2007). Professionalism in Education Management and Administration in the Educational Reform Era. Bangkok: Khao Fang.
4. National Institute of Productivity (2005). Knowledge Management Handbook: From Theory to Practice. Bangkok: Government Development Project for Being Learning Organization and Knowledge Management in Government Sectors.
5. Panich, W. Knowledge Management: Professional Edition. Bangkok: Knowledge Management Institute Foundation (KMI).
6. Nakhon Pathom Primary Educational Service Area Office 2. (2003). Development of School- Based Learning Reform Supervision Model. Nakhon Pathom: Nakhon Pathom Educational Service Area Office 2.
7. Buriram Primary Educational Service Area Office 3. (2018). Report of Implementation of Buriram Primary
Educational Service Area Office 3: Fiscal Year 2018. Buri Ram: Buriram Primary Educational Service Area
Office 3.
8. Thamthatsananon, S. (2011). Principle Theory and Innovation in Educational Administration. 2nd Edition, Maha
Sarakham: Mahasarakham University.
9. Bokowitz, W. and R. Williams. (2000). The Knowledge Management Field Book. London : Prentice Hall.
10. Brown and Moberg (1980).Oraganization Theory ans Management A Macro Approach. New York:John Wiley an Sons.
11. Henri, M. and O. Hedgepeth. (2003). Size is important in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 4(6), 25-38. Jermsittiparsert, K. & Boonratanakittiphumi, C. (2019). The Mediating Role of Knowledge Management and the Moderating Role of Additive Manufacturing (Industry 4.0) in the Relationship between Knowledge Management Capability and Firm Performance: A Case of KPMG Thailand. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 8(8), 430-449.
12. Keeves,J.P.(1988). Education Research and Methodology and Measurement. Oxford:Pergamon Press.
13. Nattle T. (1899). Teaching and Learning Approach to Supervision within a teacher Education Program. Journal of Education for Teaching, 14(2), 125-133.
14. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuch. (1995). The Knowledge-creating Company : How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York : Oxford University press.
15. Saengchai, S., Sawasdee, A., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2019). The Knowledge Management, Product Innovation, and Process Innovation as Antecedents of Sports Manufacturing Firms of Thailand. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 14(5 Proc), S2217-S2231.
16. Stufflebeam, D.L. and A.J. Shinkfield. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
17. Willer,D. (1967). Scientific Sociology Theory and Method. New Jersey Preutice.Hall.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
