Social Implication of OOP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/r98d1m93Keywords:
Societal implications, Software Development Practices, Collaboration, Code Reusability, Modular DesignAbstract
This summary delves into an examination of the social implications stemming from the adoption and integration of object-oriented programming (OOP) standards inside software program improvement practices. As OOP maintains its position as a foundational paradigm in modern software engineering, its societal ramifications expand past technical spheres, influencing collaboration, accessibility, and relationships in the broader social context.
A noteworthy social implication of OOP lies in its effect on collaborative software improvement methodologies. The modular and encapsulated design standards inherent in OOP facilitate cohesive teamwork and code reusability, fostering collaborative environments amongst builders. This collaborative ethos transcends geographical constraints, permitting global groups to seamlessly collaborate on interconnected tasks. Consequently, OOP contributes to reshaping the panorama of international collaboration in the software development domain.
Accessibility inside the realm of software program development represents another vital dimension of OOP's social impact. The encapsulation of code into items enhances code clarity and maintainability, fostering a more on-hand programming experience. This more desirable accessibility broadens participation, enabling people with various backgrounds and ability ranges to have interaction in software program development. In turn, this inclusivity democratizes access to programming understanding and promotes more varied participation in the introduction of technological solutions.
Moreover, the social implications of OOP enlarge to have an impact on societal relationships and consumer reports. Object-oriented layout principles, with a focus on modularity and encapsulation, facilitate the advent of user-friendly interfaces and interactive packages. This emphasis on consumer-centric design complements the overall consumer experience, shaping how people have interactions with era in diverse aspects of their lives, ranging from private computing to communication and entertainment.
The abstraction supplied by OOP principles in addition contributes to the improvement of state-of-the-art software program systems, impacting societal features across numerous industries including healthcare, finance, and training. By promoting modular and scalable architectures, OOP helps the advent of complicated and adaptable systems that cater to the evolving wishes of society, shaping the social panorama of technological improvements.
In conclusion, this abstract elucidates the social implications of OOP, emphasizing its influence on collaborative software improvement, accessibility, societal relationships, and person studies. As OOP keeps to conform, know-how and navigating these social implications turn out to be critical for discerning the reciprocal dating among technological paradigms and societal dynamics.
Downloads
References
1. EW. Does the ideal health care system exist? Will it be accepted in Canada? Plast Surg. 2014;22(1):7-8.
2. Eboh A, Akpata G, Akpata O, Akintoye A, Ebenezer. Health care financing in Nigeria: An Assessment of the
National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS); 2017.
3. Uzochukwu BS, Ughasoro MD, Etiaba E, Okwuosa C, Envuladu E, Onwujekwe OE. Health care financing in
Nigeria: Implications for achieving universal health coverage. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18(4):437-444.
4. R. K. Kaushik Anjali and D. Sharma, "Analyzing the Effect of Partial Shading on Performance of Grid Connected
Solar PV System," 2018 3rd International Conference and Workshops on Recent Advances and Innovations in
Engineering (ICRAIE), pp. 1-4, 2018.
5. Leitao and F. E de Moreira, "Combining cognitive semiotic and discourse analysis to explore the power of notations
in visual programming," Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC), pp. 101-108, 2012.
6. P. Blikstein, "Digital Fabrication and ‘Making’" in Education: The Democratization of Invention, FabLabs: Of
Machines, Makers and Inventors, 2013.
7. Enriching the teaching of STEM and design subjects. Department for Education (DFE), January 2018.
8. E. Rais, S. Sulaiman and S. M. Syed-Mohamad, "Game-based approach and its feasibility to support the learning of
object-oriented concepts and programming," 2011 Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering, pp. 307-312,
2011.
9. R. W. Sebesta, Concepts of Programming Languages, Pearson, pp. 792, 2015.
10. M. Resnick et al., "Scratch: programming for all," Commun. ACM, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 60-67, 2009.
11. L. Bell et al., "A Special Editorial: Educational Implications of the Digital Fabrication Revolution," TechTrends
Washington, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 2-5, 2010.
12. R. Smith, O. S. Iversen and M. Hjorth, "Design thinking for digital fabrication in education," International Journal
of Child-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, pp. 20-28, 2015.
13. M. Alrashidi, V. Callaghan and M. Gardner, "An Object-Oriented Pedagogical Model for Mixed Reality Teaching
and Learning," in: Intelligent Environments (IE) 2014 International Conference on. IEEE, pp. 202-206, 2014.
14. P. Blikstein and D. Krannich, "The makers' movement and FabLabs in education: experiences technologies and
research," In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children ACM, pp. 613-
616, 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
