Employee satisfaction and performance based on organizational culture, work motivation, and compensation

Authors

  • Christiady Purba Master Student, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, INDONESIA Author
  • Zainal Ilmi Senior Lecturer, Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, INDONESIA Author
  • Irwansyah Lecturer, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, INDONESIA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/ztpjht64

Keywords:

Organizational culture, Work motivation, Compensation, Job satisfaction, Employee performance

Abstract

This study tries to investigate the relationship between organizational culture, work motivation, and compensation for job satisfaction and employee performance at PT. Surya Hutani Jaya (Muara Kaman, Indonesia). This company is a company that manages industrial park forests (HTI), which operationally produces forest wood cost in three ways, namely seeding, planting, and harvesting. The relationship between company management and its employees is very important when individuals work to make a major contribution to the progress of the company's vision and mission. The study used a survey approach that was obtained directly through a questionnaire distributed to respondents (in this case, employees) at PT. Surya Hutani Jaya. With a purposive sampling technique, a sample size of 100 was determined. We processed the data using the SEM-PLS model through SmartPLS 3.0. Empirical findings prove that organizational culture and compensation have a positive and significant effect on job satisfaction, while work motivation has a negative and insignificant effect on job satisfaction. From the second model, work motivation and compensation have a positive and significant effect on employee performance. On the other hand, organizational culture and job satisfaction have a positive and insignificant effect on employee performance. The value of the originality of this study lies in the novelty of studies that have never been done before with objects, samples, and the use of variables and the similarity of analysis results. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Abadiyah, R., & Purwanto, D. (2016). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi, Kompensasi terhadap

Kepuasan Kerja dan Kinerja Pegawai Bank di Surabaya. Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen & Perbankan,

2(1), 49-66.

2. Andyanto, D. J., Pratikto, H., & Jaman, I. W. (2018). The Effect of Organizational Commitment

and Organizational Culture on Employee Performance through Employee Satisfaction (Study of

Gondanglegi Islamic Hospital of Malang). European Journal of Business and Management, 10(8),

23-32.

3. Bailey, D. E., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). A review of telework research: findings, new directions,

and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 383-400.

4. Binu, V. S., Mayya, S. S., & Dhar, M. (2014). Some basic aspects of statistical methods and

Sample size determination in health science research. Ayu, 35(2), 119–123.

5. Blumberg, M., & Pringle, C. D. (1982). The Missing Opportunity in Organizational Research:

Some Implications for a Theory of Work Performance. The Academy of Management Review,

7(4), 560-569.

6. Blustein, D. L. (2013). The psychology of working: A new perspective for a new era. In D. L.

Blustein (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of the psychology of working

(p. 3–18). Oxford University Press.

7. Carpenter, C. R., Neta, G., Glasgow, R. E., Rabin, B. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2015). Carpenter et

al. respond. American Journal of Public Health, 105(4), e1–e2.

8. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A.

Marcoulides (Ed.), Methodology for business and management. Modern methods for business

research (p. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence

Erlbaum.

10. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.). London

and New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.

11. Cutler, A. (2003). The seashell is on the mountaintop. London: Heinemann.

12. Daryanto, E., Sagala, S., & Badiran, M. (2015). The Influence of Individual Characteristics and

Job Characteristics on Vocational School Teachers’ Job Satisfaction in Province of North

Sumatera. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(1), 6-11.

13. Darma, D. C., Purwadi, P., Sundari, I., Hakim, Y. P., & Pusriadi, P. (2020). Job Characteristics,

Individual Characteristics, Affective Commitments, and Employee Performance. Research and

Review: Human Resource and Labour Management, 10(1), 7-18.

14. Fugate, M., Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (2012). Managing Employee Withdrawal During

Organizational Change: The Role of Threat Appraisal. Journal of Management, 38(3), 890-914.

15. Geisser, S. (1975). The predictive sample reuse method with applications. Journal of the

American Statistical Association, 70(350), 320-328.

16. Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Konsep, Teknik, Aplikasi menggunakan Smart PLS 3.0 untuk

Penelitian Empiris. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

17. Given, L. M. (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vols. 1-0).

Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

18. Hanafi, B. D., & Yohana, C. (2017). Pengaruh motivasi, dan lingkungan kerja, terhadap kinerja

karyawan, dengan kepuasan kerja sebagai variabel mediasi pada PT BNI Lifeinsurance. Journal

Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 5(1), 73-89.

19. Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of

Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159–170.

20. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. Journal of

Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 19(2),139–152.

21. Hasibuan, M. S. (2017). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

22. House, R. J. (1971). A Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness. Administrative Science

Quarterly, 16(3), 321-339.

23. Jansen, H. (2010). The Logic of Qualitative Survey Research and its Position in the Field of Social

Research Methods [63 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 11(2), Art. 11.

24. Kadir, M. A., & Amalia, L. (2017). The Effect of Job Motivation, Compensation, Organizational

Culture Towards Job Satisfaction and Employee Performance of the Ministry of Manpower.

International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 6(5), 73-80.

25. Latan, H., Jabbour, C. J., Jabbour, A. B., Wamba, S. F., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). Effects of

environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management's commitment on

Corporate Environmental Performance: The Role of Environmental Management Accounting.

Journal of Cleaner Production, 180, 297-306.

26. Lok, P., & Crawford, J. (2004). The effect of organisational culture and leadership style on job

Satisfaction and organizational commitment: A cross-national comparison. Journal of

Management Development, 23(4), 321–338.

27. Mangkunegara, A. P. (2013). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung: Remaja

Rosdakarya.

28. Maria, S., Hakim, Y. P., & Darma, D. C. (2020). Perceptions of Service Quality and Corporate

Image Against Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty. KnE Social Sciences, 4(3), 9-25.

29. Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Jilid 1. Jakarta:

Salemba Empat.

30. Mauludin, H. (2018). Pengaruh Knowledge Infrastructure Capability dan Knowledge Process

Capability terhadap Product Innovation dan Firm Performance. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi,

17(3), 216-230.

31. Narottama, I. G., & Surya, I. B. (2015). Pengaruh Karakteristik Pekerjaan dan Kompensasi

Finansial terhadap Kepuasan Kerja dan Kinerja Karyawan. E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud, 4(12),

4302-4334.

32. Novianti, H. (2015). Pelaksanaan supervisi akademik kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan kinerja

guru. Manajer Pendidikan, 9(2), 350-358.

33. Pusriadi, T., & Darma, D. C. (2020). Pengaruh talent management dan employee engagement

terhadap employee capabilities: Studi pada Karyawan PT. Bintang Wahana Tata. Jurnal Riset

Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 54-61.

34. Priansa, D. (2014). Perencanaan dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Alfabeta.

35. Purwadi, P., Darma, D. C., Widya, W., & Dedy, D. (2020). Exploration of Leadership,

Organizational Culture, Job Satisfaction, and Employee Performance. Technium Social Sciences

Journal, 6(1), 116-130.

36. Robbins, S. P. (1996). Perilaku Organisasi Edisi ke-7 (Jilid 2). Jakarta: Prehallindo.

37. Robbins, P. S., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational Behavior, Edisi 13 (Jilid 1). Jakarta:

Salemba Empat.

38. Schwartz, S. J., & Zamboanga, B. L. (2008). Testing Berry's Model of Acculturation: A

Confirmatory Latent Class Approach. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(4),

275-285.

39. Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the

Royal Statistical Society, 36(2), 111-147.

40. Stun, D. L. (1998). Five ingredients for an employee retention formula. HR Focus, 75(9), 9-11.

41. Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

42. Sutrisno, E. (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Cetak ke-6. Jakarta: Pranada Media

Group.

43. Tenenhaus, M., Esposito Vinzi, V., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling.

Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205.

44. Thoha, M. (2014). Perilaku Organisasi Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

45. Turner, S., & McCreery, G. (2016). Fact, Theory, and Hypothesis: Including the History of the

Scientific Fact. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, pp. 01–4.

46. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

47. Wangsa, R. C. (2016). Pengaruh kompensasi dan motivasi kerja terhadap kepuasan kerja

karyawan serta dampaknya pada kinerja karyawan (studi kasus pada PT. Daun Kencana Sakti).

AGORA, 4(1), 710-719.

48. Wibawa, I. W. (2018). Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Komitmen Organisasional

Dimediasi Kepuasan Kerja (Studi Pada PT. Bening Badung-Bali). E-Jurnal Manajemen Unud,

7(6), 3027-3058.

49. Wibowo, W. (2013). Manajemen Kinerja. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

50. Widodo, S. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Teori, Perencanaan Strategi, Isu-isu

Utama dan Globalisasi. Bandung: Manggu Media.

51. Wijayanti, T. C., Setini, M., Darma, D. C., Purwadi, P., & Alka, P. R. (2020). Connectivity

Continuous Improvement Program and Employee Performance. International Review of

Management and Marketing, 10(1), 54-62.

52. Zajonc, R.B. & Sales, S.M. (1966). Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses.

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2(2), 160-168.

53. Zainurossalamia, S., Darma, D. C., Kasuma, J., Ratnasari, S. L., & Tasenţe, T. (2020). Apparatus

Performance as Mediation of Creativity and Innovation Towards the Successful Application of eKelurahan. European Journal of Human Resource Management Studies, 4(2), 108-126.

Downloads

Published

31.05.2020

How to Cite

Purba, C., Ilmi, Z., & Irwansyah. (2020). Employee satisfaction and performance based on organizational culture, work motivation, and compensation. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 5615-5627. https://doi.org/10.61841/ztpjht64