FORCES ACTING ON CLASS-5 RESTORATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/3bm1a846Keywords:
Brushing simulation, forces, class 5, glass Ionomer cement, composite resin, Abrasion, non carious cervical lesion, Dental amalgamAbstract
The main aim of the review is to discuss the forces acting on the class 5 restoration. A thorough literature search was performed using databases like PubMed, Google Scholar, BioRxiv, MESH, and the Cochrane database using the keywords ‘forces, ‘class 5,’ and ‘restoration’ with no date and year restrictions. The language is restricted to English. 8 articles with similar data were found, which were analyzed and have been included in this study. The effect of brushing in class 5 restoration leads to poor esthetics, and the person loses the confidence to smile. Vigorous and improper brushing damages the class 5 restoration. Class 5 cavities involve caries affecting the gingival one-third of facial or lingual surfaces of anterior or posterior teeth. Class 5 has only one surface, and there is no direct force acting on it, so it is free of mechanical problems. A tooth can withstand force because of the resiliency of dentin. Several studies have demonstrated that the use of an adhesive matrix decreases cuspal flexure compared with occlusal amalgam restoration. The depth of an occlusal restoration, particularly, is more critical than the width. Some instances also showed that the peak stresses were greater than the known bond strengths of composite to dentine.
Downloads
References
1. Zhang C, Yang B, Wang Y. [Superficial and internal adaptations of a new self-curing composite resin
restored class Ⅴ cavity]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 9;55(3):171–7.
2. Ariga P, Nallaswamy D, Jain AR, Ganapathy DM. Determination of Correlation of Width of Maxillary
Anterior Teeth Using Extraoral and Intraoral Factors in the Indian Population: A Systematic Review [Internet].
Vol. 9, World Journal of Dentistry. 2018. p. 68–75. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-
10015-1509
3. Granath L-E. Photoelastic Model Experiments on Class II Cavity Restorations of Dental Amalgam. 1965.
38 p.
4. Jyothi S, Robin PK, Ganapathy D, Anandiselvaraj. Periodontal Health Status of Three Different Groups
Wearing Temporary Partial Dentures [Internet]. Vol. 10, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.
2017. p. 4339. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2017.00795.8
5. Duraisamy R, Krishnan CS, Ramasubramanian H, Sampathkumar J, Mariappan S, Navarasampatti
Sivaprakasam A. Compatibility of Nonoriginal Abutments With Implants: Evaluation of Microgap at the
Implant-Abutment Interface, With Original and Nonoriginal Abutments. Implant Dent. 2019
Jun; 28(3):289–95.
6. International Tropical Timber Organization. ITTO Guidelines for the Restoration, Management and
Rehabilitation of Degraded and Secondary Tropical Forests. 2002. 84 p.
7. Selvan SR, Ganapathy D. Efficacy of fifth-generation cephalosporins against methicillin-resistant
Staphylococcus aureus-A review [Internet]. Vol. 9, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016.
p. 1815. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00369.3
8. Correia A, Andrade MR, Tribst J, Borges A, Caneppele T. Influence of Bulk-Fill Restoration on
Polymerization Shrinkage Stress and Marginal Gap Formation in Class V Restorations. Open Dent
[Internet]. 2020 Apr 3; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/19-062-L
9. Ganapathy D. Effect of Resin Bonded Luting Agents Influencing Marginal Discrepancy in All Ceramic
Complete Veneer Crowns [Internet]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH. 2016.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2016/21447.9028
10. Society for Ecological Restoration. Conference. Wetland and Riparian Restoration: Taking a Broader View
: Contributed Papers and Selected Abstracts, Society for Ecological Restoration International Conference,
September 14-16, 1995, Seattle, Washington. 1997. 284 p.
11. Subasree S, Murthykumar K, Dhanraj. Effect of Aloe Vera in Oral Health-A Review [Internet]. Vol. 9,
Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016. p. 609. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00116.5
12. Oz FD, Ergin E, Cakir FY, Gurgan S. Clinical Evaluation of a Self-Adhering Flowable Resin Composite in
Minimally Invasive Class I Cavities: 5-year Results of a Double-Blind Randomized, Controlled Clinical
Trial. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2020 Mar;54(1):10–21.
13. Jain A, Ranganathan H, Ganapathy D. Cervical and incisal marginal discrepancy in ceramic laminate
Veneering materials: A SEM analysis [Internet]. Vol. 8, Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2017. p. 272.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_156_17
14. Nanda KJ, Naik S. An In-Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Pre-treatment With Nano-Silver Fluoride on
Inhibiting Secondary Caries at Tooth Restoration Interface. Cureus. 2020 May 2;12(5):e7934.
15. Vijayalakshmi B, Ganapathy D. Medical management of cellulitis [Internet]. Vol. 9, Research Journal of
Pharmacy and Technology. 2016. p. 2067. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-
360x.2016.00422.4
16. Heck K, Frasheri I, Diegritz C, Manhart J, Hickel R, Fotiadou C. Six-year results of a randomized
controlled clinical trial of two glass ionomer cements in class II cavities. J Dent. 2020 Jun;97:103333.
17. Ganapathy DM, Kannan A, Venugopalan S. Effect of Coated Surfaces influencing Screw Loosening in
Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [Internet]. Vol. 8, World Journal of Dentistry. 2017. p.
496–502. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1493
18. Tay HH. Laboratory Simulation of Microleakage in Class 5 Composite Resin Restorations Placed Without
Retention: A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment ... Restorative Dentistry, Operative ... 1988.
19. Ashok V, Suvitha S. Awareness of all ceramic restoration in rural population [Internet]. Vol. 9, Research
Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016. p. 1691. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-
360x.2016.00340.1
20. Vasudeva G, Nikhil V, Bogra P, Singh V. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V
restoration interface: A finite-element study [Internet]. Vol. 22, Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2011. p.
295. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.84308
21. Wolff D, Schick S, Staehle HJ, Frese C. Novel Microscalpels for Removing Proximal Composite Resin
Overhangs on Class II Restorations. Oper Dent. 2017;42(3):297–307.
22. Ashok V, Nallaswamy D, Benazir Begum S, Nesappan T. Lip Bumper Prosthesis for an Acromegaly
Patient: A Clinical Report [Internet]. Vol. 14, The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2014. p. 279–
82. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0339-6
23. Özyürek T, Ülker Ö, Demiryürek EÖ, Yılmaz F. The Effects of Endodontic Access Cavity Preparation
Design on the Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Traditional Versus Conservative
Preparation. J Endod. 2018 May;44(5):800–5.
24. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The effect of cuspal flexure on a buccal Class V restoration: a finite element study
[Internet]. Vol. 26, Journal of Dentistry. 1998. p. 361–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0300-
5712(97)00015-8
25. Danley BT, Hamilton BN, Tantbirojn D, Goldstein RE, Versluis A. Cuspal Flexure and Stress in Restored
Teeth Caused by Amalgam Expansion [Internet]. Vol. 43, Operative Dentistry. 2018. p. E300–7. Available
from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2341/17-329-l
26. Venugopalan S, Ariga P, Aggarwal P, Viswanath A. Magnetically retained silicone facial prosthesis. Niger
J Clin Pract. 2014 Mar;17(2):260–4.
27. Vasudeva G, Bogra P. The effect of occlusal restoration and loading on the development of abfraction
Lesions: A finite element study [Internet]. Vol. 11, Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2008. p. 117.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.45250
28. Ajay R, Suma K, Ali S, Sivakumar JK, Rakshagan V, Devaki V, et al. Effect of surface modifications on
the retention of cement-retained implant crowns under fatigue loads: An In vitro study [Internet]. Vol. 9,
Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences. 2017. p. 154. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_146_17
29. Beninati CJ, Katona TR. The combined effects of salivas and occlusal indicators on occlusal contact forces
[Internet]. Vol. 46, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2019. p. 468–74. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joor.12772
30. Kannan A, Venugopalan S. A systematic review on the effect of use of impregnated retraction cords on
gingiva [Internet]. Vol. 11, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018. p. 2121. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00393.1
31. Basha FYS, Ganapathy D, Venugopalan S. Oral Hygiene Status among Pregnant Women [Internet]. Vol.
11. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018. p. 3099. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00569.3
32. Graham CH. Effects of occlusal instability [Internet]. Vol. 21, Australian Dental Journal. 1976. p. 15–22.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1976.tb04412.x
33. Coleman TA. Effects of Stress on Teeth [Internet]. Occlusal Diseases and the Impact of Microtrauma. p.
3387–5028. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1617-0.les4
34. Farhat Yaasmeen Sadique Basha, Rajeshkumar S, Lakshmi T, Anti-inflammatory activity of Myristica
fragrance extract. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci., 2019; 10(4), 3118-3120 DOI:
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
