ASSOCIATION OF AGE AND GENDER PREVALENCE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING AESTHETIC CORRECTIONS USING VENEERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/pvwwcx40Keywords:
Discolouration, Spacing, VeneeringAbstract
Aim: The aim of the study was to find out the association between the age and gender distribution in patients undergoing veneering treatment.
Materials and Methods: Patients who reported for esthetic management of teeth and for whom veneering treatment had been done in Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai, from June 2019 to March 2020 were recruited. A total of 156 direct and indirect veneers were done among the reported patients. Data regarding age, gender, tooth number, and reason (spacing, discoloration, or both) for the need of esthetic treatment were collected and analyzed.
Results: Out of 156 patients, most (71.2%) of the patients belonged to the age group between 20 and 40 years. Gender distribution of patients showed 37.8% of the patients were females and 62.2% of the patients were males. 48.7% of the patients reported with the complaint of spacing Also, associations between gender and reason for veneering treatment and age and reason for veneering treatment were found to be statistically significant.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, the age group between 20 and 40 years reported the maximum for veneering treatment (71.2%). Among the genders, males (62.2%) reported a higher incidence than females (37.8). Spacing (48.7%) was the most common reason for patients undergoing veneering treatment.
Downloads
References
1. PINCUS, R. C. Building mouth personality. J South Calif Dent Assoc. 1938;14:125–9.
2. Faunce FR, Myers DR. Laminate veneer restoration of permanent incisors. J Am Dent Assoc.
1976;93(4):790–2.
3. Helpin ML, Fleming JE. Laboratory technique for the laminate veneer restoration. Pediatr Dent.
1982;4(1):48–50.
4. Haas BR. Mastique veneers: a cosmetic and financial alternative in post-periodontal care. J N J Dent Assoc.
1982;53(4):25.
5. Pippin DJ, Mixson JM, Soldan-Els AP. Clinical Evaluation Of Restored Maxillary Incisors: Veneers Vs. Pfm
Crowns. The Journal Of The American Dental Association. 1995 Nov 1;126(11):1523–9.
6. Rajendran R, Kunjusankaran RN, Sandhya R, Anilkumar A, Santhosh R, Patil SR. Comparative Evaluation of
Remineralizing Potential of a Paste Containing Bioactive Glass and a Topical Cream Containing Casein
Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate: An in Vitro Study [Internet]. Vol. 19, Pesquisa Brasileira em
Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2019. p. 1–10. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.4034/pboci.2019.191.61
7. Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: A review of the literature. J
Prosthet Dent. 2006 Dec 1;96(6):433–42.
8. Meyenberg K. The ideal restoration of endodontically treated teeth--structural and esthetic considerations: a
Review of the literature and clinical guidelines for the restorative clinician. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2013;8(2):238–68.
9. Jose J, Subbaiyan H. Different Treatment Modalities followed by Dental Practitioners for Ellis Class 2
Fracture—A Questionnaire-based Survey. Open Dent J [Internet]. 2020; Available from:
https://opendentistryjournal.com/VOLUME/14/PAGE/59/FULLTEXT/
10. Ravinthar K, Others. Recent Advancements in Laminates and Veneers in Dentistry. Research Journal of
Pharmacy and Technology. 2018;11(2):785–7.
11. Prieto LT, Araujo CT, de Oliveira DC, de Azevedo Vaz SL, D’Arce MB, Paulillo LA. Minimally invasive
Cosmetic dentistry: smile reconstruction using direct resin bonding. Gen Dent. 2014;62(1):28–31.
12. Meijering AC, Creugers NHJ, Roeters FJM, Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a
Clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. J Dent. 1998 Sep 1;26(7):563–8.
13. Pini NIP, Sundfeld-Neto D, Aguiar FHB, Sundfeld RH, Martins LRM, Lovadino JR, et al. Enamel
Microabrasion: An overview of clinical and scientific considerations. World Journal of Clinical Cases: WJCC.
2015;3(1):34.
14. Janani K, Palanivelu A, Sandhya R. Diagnostic accuracy of dental pulse oximeter with customized sensor
holder, thermal test, and electric pulp test for the evaluation of pulp vitality: an in vivo study. Brazilian Dental
Science. 2020;23(1):8.
15. McLaren EA, Whiteman YY. Ceramics: rationale for material selection. Compend Contin Educ Dent.
2010;31(9):666–8.
16. Vanini L, Mangani FM. Determination and communication of color using the five color dimensions of teeth.
Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 2001;13(1):19–26.
17. Dietschi D, Non-metallici SRRA. Attuali Concetti per il Trattamento Estetico dei Denti Posteriori. Milan:
Scienza Tecnica Dentistica Ed Int. 1997;
18. Vanini L, De FS, Tammaro S. Indirect composite restorations in the anterior region: a predictable technique for complex cases. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1997;9(7):795–802.
19. Caleffi A, Berardi D. Veneers in porcellana mordenzata: esperienze cliniche e nuove metodiche: dalle
porcellane tradizionali alle ceramiche integrali a pressione. Resch; 1994.
20. Teja KV, Ramesh S, Priya V. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-3 gene expression in inflammation: A
molecular study. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(6):592.
21. Mahalakshmi Nandakumar In a comparative evaluation of grape seed and cranberry extracts in preventing
Enamel erosion: An optical emission spectrometric analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(5):516.
22. Hussainy SN, Nasim I, Thomas T, Ranjan M. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement,
Flowable composite and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up.
J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(5):510.
23. Ramamoorthi S, Nivedhitha MS, Divyanand MJ. Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after using
endodontic needle and EndoActivator during root canal irrigation: A randomized controlled trial. Aust Endod J.
2015 Aug;41(2):78–87.
24. Ramanathan S, Solete P. Cone-beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation using
Various Rotary Instruments: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Nov 1;16(11):869–72.
25. Siddique R, Sureshbabu NM, Somasundaram J, Jacob B, Selvam D. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of
precipitate formation following interaction of chlorhexidine with sodium hypochlorite, neem, and tulsi. J
Conserv Dent. 2019 Jan;22(1):40–7.
26. Kumar, D, Delphine Priscilla Antony S. Calcified Canal and Negotiation-A Review [Internet]. Vol. 11,
Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018. p. 3727. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0974-
360x.2018.00683.2
27. Rajakeerthi R, Ms N. Natural Product as the Storage Medium for an avulsed tooth--A Systematic Review.
Cumhuriyet Dental Journal. 2019;22(2):249–56.
28. Noor S, Others. Chlorhexidine: Its properties and effects. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology.
2016;9(10):1755–60.
29. Teja KV, Ramesh S. Shape optimally and clean more. Saudi Endodontic Journal. 2019 Sep 1;9(3):235.
30. Manohar M, Sharma S. A survey of the knowledge, attitude, and awareness about the principal choice of
intracanal medicaments among the general dental practitioners and nonendodontic specialists [Internet]. Vol. 29,
Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2018. p. 716. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_716_16
31. Coelho-de-Souza FH, Gonçalves DS, Sales MP, Erhardt MCG, Corrêa MB, Opdam NJM, et al. Direct
Anterior composite veneers in vital and non-vital teeth: A retrospective clinical evaluation. J Dent. 2015 Nov
1;43(11):1330–6.
32. Meijering AC, Roeters FJM, Mulder J, Creugers NHJ. Patients’ satisfaction with different types of veneer
restorations [Internet]. Vol. 25, Journal of Dentistry. 1997. p. 493–7. Available from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00067-x
33. Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK. Ten-year outcome of porcelain laminate veneers placed within the general dental
services in England and Wales. J Dent. 2009 Jan 1;37(1):31–8.
34. Burke FJT, Lucarotti PSK, Holder RL. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental
Services in England and Wales (Part 2): Variation by patients’ characteristics. J Dent. 2005 Nov 1;33(10):817–
26.
35. Dunne SM, Millar BJ. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Br Dent J. 1993 Nov 1;175(9):317–21.
36. Farhat Yaasmeen Sadique Basha, Rajeshkumar S, Lakshmi T, Anti-inflammatory activity of Myristica fragrans extract. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci., 2019; 10(4), 3118-3120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v10i4.1607
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
