A Management perspective of CSR Reporting via Academic Entrepreneurship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/htj66320Keywords:
CSR,, Entrepreneurship,, UIL,Business Philosophy,, IT Act,, Board Engagement.Abstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has much bigger implications for inclusive development of the any country. Industrial linkages of Academic Institutions are boosting entrepreneurial knowhow of the CSR Reporting practices. A systematic review of literature collected from Journals, Books, IT reports, Public documents and Economic survey reports were used for discussion. To relate fundamental business philosophy to make CSR sharper, smarter, and focused is what reallymatters and is the core part of any business in the 21st business philosophy century. Many companies have invested noted share of profits in various social development sectors. Also, there is research evidence to show that CSR work of the companies have reached where government could not reach so far in terms of financial Inclusion. However, there are some reports showing most of the companies have not even have CSR policies yet. All though various Indian corporate involved in CSR activities; it is not enough when contrast to their actual financial strength. This paper gives a solid background for the discussion about the possible role of CSR with respect to Social Inclusion
Downloads
References
1. Ashish Mathur and Meeta M. Nihalani. (2011), “Corporate Social Responsibility in The Modem Economy: A Way To Sustainable Business Practices,” International journal of Business Economics and Management research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 33-45
2. Barney, J.B., (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal Of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99-121.
3. Bjornskov, C., and Foss, N.J. (2016), “Institutions, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth: What Do We Know and What Do We Still Need to Know?,” Academy of Management Perspectives, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 292-315, doi:10.5465/amp.2015.0135.
4. Bridgstock, R. (2017), “The University and the Knowledge Network: A New Educational Model for Twenty- First Century Learning and Employability,” Graduate employability in context, Palgrave Macmillan, London
pp. 339-358.
5. Bylund, P.L. and Mccaffrey, M. (2017), “A Theory of Entrepreneurship and Institutional Uncertainty,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 32 no. 5, pp. 461-475, 2017.
6. Carroll, A. B. (2016), “Carroll’s Pyramid of CSR: Taking another Look. International Journal Of Corporate Social Responsibility,” vol. 1, no. 1, doi:10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6
7. Das Gupta, A. and Das Gupta, A. (2008), ”Corporate social responsibility in India: towards a sane society?," Social Responsibility Journal, vol. 4. no. 1/2, pp. 209-216, https://doi.org/10.1108/17471110810856965
8. Donnellon, A., Ollila, S., and Middleton, K. (2014)., “Constructing Entrepreneurial Identity In Entrepreneurship Education,” The International Journal of Management Education, vol. 12, pp. 490-499.
9. Elembilassery, V. and Gurunathan, L.. (2018), "Mandated CSR and Mode of Implementation: The Indian Context," Social Responsibility Journal, vol. 14 no. 4, pp. 701-718.
10. Holme and Watts (2010), “Corporate Social Responsibility towards Women Empowerment,” Journal of Research in Management and Technology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 23-25.
11. Jamali, D. (2008), “A Stakeholder Approach To Corporate Social Responsibility: A Fresh Perspective Into Theory And Practice,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 213–23. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9572- 4
12. Joseph, J. and Varghese, T. (2014), “Role of Financial Inclusion in the Development of Indian Economy,” Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 6-15.
13. Kwakye, T.O., Welbeck, E.E., Owusu, G.M.Y., and Anokye, F.K.. (2018), “Determinants Of Intention To Engage In Sustainability Accounting & Reporting (SAR): The Perspective Of Professional Accountants,” International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, vol. 3 no. 1, doi:10.1186/s40991-018-0035-2
14. Manjit Kour (2013), “Business Ethics for Inclusive Growth,” International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 39-41.
15. McWilliams, Abagail and Siegel, Donald (2001), “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 26, pp. 117-27, doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011987.
16. Ness, M. (1992), "Corporate Social Responsibility," British Food Journal, vol. 94 no. 7, pp. 38-44.
17. Newell, P. and Frynas, J.G. (1998), “Beyond CSR? Business, Poverty and Social Justice: An Introduction,” Third World Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 669-681, 2014.
18. Reinhardt, F.L., “Environmental Product Differentiation: Implications for Corporate Strategy,” California Management Review, vol. 40, no. 4, pp 43-73, doi:10.2307/41165964
19. Spiller, R. (2000), “Ethical Business and Investment: A Model for Business And Society,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 27, pp. 149-160.
20. Varghese, T. and Dhote, K. K. (2014), “Impact of Working Capital Management on Firm Profitability: A Case Study of HUL Ltd,” International Journal of Financial Management, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 56-66.
21. Varghese, T. and Jayalekshmi, R. (2015), “Working Capital Analysis of Indian FMCG Companies: A Comparative Study Of ITC & HUL Ltd,” Advance and Innovative Research, vol. 2 no. 2, pp. 63-76.
22. Varghese, T. (2014), “Convergence of GAAP to IFRS: Opportunities and Challenges for India,” International Journal of Business and Management Invention, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 9-15
23. Varghese, T. (2016), “Evaluating Performance of A Service Cooperative Bank: An Application of CAMEL Model,” Indian Journal of Finance, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 7-27.
24. Wood, D.J. (1991), “Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 16,
pp. 691–718.
25. Gangurde HH, Gulecha VS, Borkar VS, Mahajan MS, Khandare RA, Mundada AS. "Swine Influenza A (H1N1 Virus): A Pandemic Disease." Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 2.2 (2011), 110-124.
26. Chandan, A. (2019). Expernimental Analysis of Kinematics and Injury of Pillion Passenger in Motorcycle Crash. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 15(1), 23-34.
27. Tharinie, V., & Pandiyaraj, (2016). Ant Colony Optimization based Latency Conscious Routing Protocol (ACO- LCRP) for Wireless Sensor Network. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Emerging Technology, 8(3), 191-199.
28. Koti, K. Variables influencing investor behavior: The case of bombay stock exchange (2019) Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera, 50 (2), pp. 74-80.
29. Chavez, D.A., Quispe, T.R., Villalba-Condori, K. The pragmatic resources of verbal irony in the film annie hall: An analysis from the perspective of the theory of relevance (2019) Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera, 50 (2), pp. 113-130.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
