A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS ASSESSING THE FREQUENCY OF PATIENTS WILLING TO UNDERGO RETREATMENT OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT AFTER RELAPSE

Authors

  • Monica Antony Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences(SIMATS), Saveetha university, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India Author
  • Remmiya Mary Varghese Senior lecturer, Department of orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science((SIMATS), Saveetha university, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India Author
  • Leelavathi L. Senior lecturer, Department of public health dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Science((SIMATS), Saveetha university, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/6j33yz05

Keywords:

Aesthetics, orthodontic therapy, relapse, retainers, retreatment

Abstract

Introduction: Orthodontic relapse is the tendency for teeth to return to their pre-treatment position. It is difficult for the tooth to be maintained in the corrected position that was achieved by orthodontic treatment without proper retention. Factors that cause the teeth to move back to original malocclusion include periodontal, gingival, occlusal, and growth-related factors. The aim of the study is to assess the frequency of patients willing to undergo retreatment of orthodontic treatment after relapse.

Materials and methods: 588 data points were collected on the study population between June 2010 and April 2020 that had removable orthodontic treatment done due to relapse. The data was imported to the software IBM SPSS Version 23.0 and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson's correlation. Graphs were obtained, and the results were tabulated. Statistical significance was set at <0.05.

Results: Out of the total study population who have been treated with removable appliances, 33.50% of the study population had undergone retreatment, and 28.57% of the population that had undergone treatment were new cases that were in the age group of 21 to 30 years. 54.08% of the study population that underwent orthodontic treatment were females, of which 27.04% were retreatment and 27.04% were new cases, and 45.92% were males, of which 23.64% were retreatment and 22.28% were new cases.

Conclusion: Relapse being unpredictable, it is important to educate the patients to be fully committed when undergoing orthodontic treatment. The patient should be dedicated to wearing the retainer and also made to understand that by wearing the retainer as directed, it will help the teeth along with the surrounding hard and soft tissues to realign, stabilizing the new bite. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Rogers AP. Stimulating arch development by the exercise of the masseter-temporalis group of muscles.

Vol. 8, International Journal of Orthodontia, Oral Surgery and Radiography. 1922. p. 61–4.

2. Jain RK, Kumar SP, Manjula WS. Comparison of intrusion effects on maxillary incisors among mini

implant anchorage, j-hook headgear, and utility arch. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jul;8(7):ZC21–4.

3. Felicita AS. Quantification of intrusive/retraction force and moment generated during en-masse retraction

of maxillary anterior teeth using mini-implants: A conceptual approach. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017

Sep; 22(5):47–55.

4. Viswanath A, Ramamurthy J, Dinesh SPS, Srinivas A. Obstructive sleep apnea: awakening the hidden

truth. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015 Jan;18(1):1–7.

5. Felicita AS, Chandrasekar S, Shantha Sundari KK. Determination of craniofacial relation among the

Subethnic Indian population: a modified approach—the sagittal relation. Indian J Dent Res. 2012

May; 23(3):305–12.

6. Krishnan S, Pandian K, Kumar S. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of

Indian adults. Vol. 29, Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2018. p. 137.

7. Oppenheim A. The crisis in orthodontia, Part I. 2. Tissue changes during retention. Skogsborg’s

Septotomy. Vol. 20, International Journal of Orthodontia and Dentistry for Children. 1934. p. 639–44.

8. Recent Literature A Treatise on Oral Deformities as a Branch of Mechanical Surgery. By Norman W.

Kingsley, M.D.S., D.D.S., etc., etc. With over three hundred and fifty illustrations. New York: D.

Appleton & Co. 1880. Vol. 103, The Boston Medical and Surgical Journal. 1880. p. 16–16.

9. Lundström AF. Malocclusion of the teeth regarded as a problem in connection with the apical base . Vol.

11, International Journal of Orthodontia, Oral Surgery and Radiography. 1925. p. 591–602.

10. Tweed CH. Indications for the extraction of teeth in orthodontic procedure. Vol. 30, American Journal of

Orthodontics and Oral Surgery. 1944. p. 405–28.

11. Littlewood SJ, Russell JS, James Spencer R. Why do orthodontic cases relapse? Vol. 2, Orthodontic

Update. 2009. p. 38–44

12. Kumar KRR, Ramesh Kumar KR, Shanta Sundari KK, Venkatesan A, Chandrasekar S. Depth of resin

Penetration into Enamel with 3 Types of Enamel Conditioning Methods: A Confocal Microscopic Study. Vol.

140, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2011. p. 479–85.

13. Samantha C, Sundari S, Chandrasekhar S, Sivamurthy G, Dinesh S. Comparative Evaluation of Two BisGMA-Based Orthodontic Bonding Adhesives - A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017

Apr;11(4):ZC40–4.

14. Felicita AS, Sumathi Felicita A. Orthodontic extrusion of Ellis Class VIII fracture of maxillary lateral

Incisor—The slingshot method. Vol. 30, The Saudi Dental Journal. 2018. p. 265–9.

15. Vikram NR, Prabhakar R, Kumar SA, Karthikeyan MK, Saravanan R. Ball Headed Mini Implant. J Clin

Diagn Res. 2017 Jan;11(1):ZL02–3.

16. Felicita AS. Orthodontic management of a dilacerated central incisor and partially impacted canine with

Unilateral extraction—a case report. Saudi Dent J. 2017 Oct;29(4):185–93.

17. Proffit WR. Equilibrium Theory Reexamined: To What Extent Do Tongue and Lip Pressures Influence

Tooth position and thereby the occlusion. Oral Physiology and Occlusion. 1978. p. 55–77.

18. Sivamurthy G, Sundari S. Stress distribution patterns at mini-implant site during retraction and intrusion--a three-dimensional finite element study. Prog Orthod. 2016 Jan 18;17:4.

19. Krishnan S, Pandian S, Kumar S A. Effect of bisphosphonates on orthodontic tooth movement-an update.

J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Apr;9(4):ZE01–5.

20. Little RM. Stability and Relapse of Dental Arch Alignment. Vol. 17, British Journal of Orthodontics.

1990. p. 235–41.

21. Vaden JL, Harris EF, Behrents RG. Adult versus adolescent Class II correction: A comparison. Vol. 107,

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1995. p. 651–61.

22. Gill DS, Naini FB, Jones A, Tredwin CJ. Part-time versus full-time retainer wear following fixed

Appliance therapy: a randomized prospective controlled trial. World J Orthod. 2007 Autumn;8(3):300–6.

23. Kamisetty SK. SBS vs. Inhouse Recycling Methods-And Invitro Evaluation. Journal of clinical and

Diagnostic Research. 2015.

24. Thickett E, Power S. A randomized clinical trial of thermoplastic retainer wear. Vol. 32, The European

Journal of Orthodontics. 2010. p. 1–5.

25. Hassan AH, Amin HE-S. Association of orthodontic treatment needs and oral health-related quality of life

in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jan;137(1):42–7.

26. Dinesh SPS, Arun AV, Sundari KKS, Samantha C, Ambika K. An indigenously designed apparatus for

measuring orthodontic force. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Nov;7(11):2623–6.

27. Rubika J, Sumathi Felicita A, Sivambiga V. Gonial Angle as an Indicator for the Prediction of Growth

Pattern. Vol. 6, World Journal of Dentistry. 2015. p. 161–3.

28. Little RM. Stability and relapse: Early treatment of arch length deficiency. Vol. 121, American Journal of

Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2002. p. 578–81.

29. Danz JC, Greuter C, Sifakakis I, Fayed M, Pandis N, Katsaros C. Stability and relapse after orthodontic

Treatment of deep bite cases--a long-term follow-up study. Vol. 36, The European Journal of Orthodontics.

2014. p. 522–30

30. Pollard D, Akyalcin S, Wiltshire WA, Rody WJ. Relapse of orthodontically corrected bites in

accordance with growth pattern. Vol. 141, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial

Orthopedics. 2012. p. 477–83.

31. Little RM, Wallen TR, Riedel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment—first premolar

extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Vol. 80, American Journal of Orthodontics.

1981. p. 349–65.

32. Reitan K. Clinical and histologic observations on tooth movement during and after orthodontic treatment.

Vol. 53, American Journal of Orthodontics. 1967. p. 721–45.

33. R AD la C, De la Cruz R A, Sampson P, Little RM, Årtun J, Shapiro PA. Long-term changes in arch form

after orthodontic treatment and retention. Vol. 107, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial

Orthopedics. 1995. p. 518–30.

34. Farhat Yaasmeen Sadique Basha, Rajeshkumar S, Lakshmi T, Anti-inflammatory activity of Myristica

fragrance extract. Int. J. Res. Pharm. Sci., 2019; 10(4), 3118-3120 DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v10i4.1607

Downloads

Published

31.05.2020

How to Cite

Antony, M., Mary Varghese, R., & L. , L. (2020). A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS ASSESSING THE FREQUENCY OF PATIENTS WILLING TO UNDERGO RETREATMENT OF ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT AFTER RELAPSE. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 5077-5084. https://doi.org/10.61841/6j33yz05