A Pragmatic Study Of BBC and CNN Economic News
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/rsej5z66Keywords:
Speech Act Theory, the Model of Study, the NewsAbstract
The present study is an attempt to check and analyze the BBC and CNN economic news from a pragmatic perspective. The study aims at achieving the following two principal objectives. The first one is to talk about and make sense of discourse act hypothesis just as its different sorts, while the second one is to test discourse acts ideas and apply them to monetary news inside chief activity. It is noted that discourse acts assume a significant task in the field of talk examination and are the most significant guideline and standard for a book, which is clear when deciphering a particular talk text (found in one sentence or gathering of sentences). The present analysis is tied in with utilizing various sorts of discourse demonstration in chosen English monetary news. They were picked arbitrarily that from News channels BBC and CNN. The issue that the analyst bargains inside this paper is to distinguish the various kinds of discourse in the monetary content and afterward comprehend why some discourse demonstrations are worked more than others. The examination was meant to contemplate discourse acts in the chosen English financial news for five writings. The theoretical structure of the investigation was examined monetary news to accomplish consequences of discourse acts in the news that would be referenced later. The current paper falls into two parts and an end. However, the study will adopt notions taken from Grice's cooperative principles (1995), Austin speech act theory (1962), and Searle's speech act theory (1969) as its model since their notions are relative to the aims of the present study.
Downloads
References
1. Abdulla, H. I. (1989). A Pragmatic Analysis of Two Excerpts from Robert Bolt's A Man All Seasons. University of Lancaster.
2. Al-Sulaimaan, M. M. (2010). Semantics and Pragmatics. Mosul: Mosul University Press.
3. Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things With Words. London: Oxford University Press.
4. Bach, K. & Harnish, R. (1979). Linguistics, Communication, and Speech Acts. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
5. Grice, M. L. (1995). Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
6. (1975). "Logic and Conversation," In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics Vol. III: Speech
Acts. New York: Academic Press.
7. Hameed, H. (2017). " Using Speech Acts And Maxims In Selected Summary Leads In News Web Version Of
American Agencies : Pragmatics Study, University of Kufa.
8. Rowe, Jeff. (2005). Broadcast New Writing for Professionals. Oak Park: Marion Street Press, Inc.
9. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. NY: Longman.
10. Meyer, C. F. (2009). Introducing English Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics (Second ed.). MA: Blackwell Publishing.
12. O’Keeffe, A. (2011) ‘Media and Discourse Analysis’, in Gee, J. & Handford M. (eds.), The Routledge
Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 441-454.
13. Richard Nordquist, 2019, Pragmatics Gives Context to Language: Body language and tone of voice augment
actual words (https://www.thoughtco.com/pragmatics-language-1691654) (accessed March 9, 2020).
14. Robertson, S. P. (2010). A Proposed Culture by ICT-Development Matrix for Digital Government.
Proceedings from IWCI-2010, Copenhagen.
15. Reiter, R. M. (2000). Linguistic Politeness in Britain and Uruguay: A Contrastive Study of Requests and
Apologies. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
16. Searle, J. (1969). Speech Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Saeed, J. I. (2003). Semantics. Madlen: Blackwell Publishing.
18. Van Dijk, T. A. (1931). Studies in the Pragmatics of Discourse. The Hague: Montion Publishers.
19. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
