The underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions that explain the relationship between transformational leadership and frontline employee performance: a field study onhotel staff in the Kurdistan region of Iraq
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/g515jw58Keywords:
noigeR, ffatS, ,secnamrofreP, yradnuoB, ,smsinahceMAbstract
The fundamental factors and restricting constraints illustrate the assembly between employee performance and leadership at the front line. It examines the role of the mediator for organizational identification and jobs in the partnership between transition, jobs and community behaviour. The research further explores how constructive identities mitigate the influence of disruptive leadership on identity and engagement. In Iraq, 323 front-line hotel staff in Kurdistan evaluate data using the least incomplete regression. Findings show that transformational leadership is correlated with organizational citizenship, whereas dedication partly arbitrates the connection among transformative leadership and jobs results. Eventually, Results revealed that positive behaviors boost temperament and dedication leadership impact. The research offered hotel management information on why and in what way the staff does this under these circumstances. The results show quantitative action impacts on employees ' performance.
Downloads
References
1. K. Alfes, A.D. Shantz, C. Truss, E.C. Soane,The link between perceived human resource management practices, engagement and employee behaviour: a moderated mediation modelInt. J. Hum. Resour. Manage., 24 (2) (2013), pp. 330-351
2. N.J. Allen, J.P. Meyer,The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 63 (1) (1990), pp. 1-18
3. J. Antonakis, D.V. Day, B. Schyns , Leadership and individual differences: at the cusp of a renaissance Leadersh. Q., 23 (4) (2012), pp. 643-650
4. B.E. Ashforth, F. Mael Social identity theory and the organization Acad. Manage. Rev., 14 (1) (1989),
pp. 20-39
5. B.J. Avolio, W.L. Gardner, F.O. Walumbwa, F. Luthans, D.R. May , Unlocking the mask: a look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors Leadersh. Q., 15 (6) (2004),
pp. 801-823
6. E. Babakus, U. Yavas, O.M. Karatepe, T. Avci , The effect of management commitment to service quality on employees’ affective and performance outcomes J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 31 (3) (2003), pp. 272- 286
7. M.E. Babcock-Roberson, O.J. Strickland The relationship between charismatic leadership, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behaviors J. Psychol., 144 (3) (2010), pp. 313-326
8. B.J. Babin, J.S. Boles Employee behavior in a service environment: a model and test of potential differences between men and women J. Market. (1998), pp. 77-91
9. A.B. Bakker, E. Demerouti , Towards a model of work engagement , Career Dev. Int., 13 (3) (2008), pp. 209-223
10. A.B. Bakker, W.B. Schaufeli, M.P. Leiter, T.W. Taris , Work engagement: an emerging concept in occupational health psychology , Work Stress, 22 (3) (2008), pp. 187-200
11. A.B. Bakker, M. Tims, D. Derks , Proactive personality and job performance: the role of job crafting and work engagement , Hum. Relat., 65 (10) (2012), pp. 1359-1378
12. J.E. Barbuto, M.E. Burbach , The emotional intelligence of transformational leaders: a field study of elected officials J. Soc. Psychol., 146 (1) (2006), pp. 51-64
13. B.M. Bass , Leadership: Good, better, best Organ. Dyn., 13 (3) (1985), pp. 26-40
14. B.M. Bass , From transactional to transformational leadership: learning to share the vision Organ. Dyn., 18 (3) (1990), pp. 19-31 .
15. T.S. Bateman, J.M. Crant, The proactive component of organizational behavior: a measure and correlates , J. Organ. Behav., 14 (2) (1993), pp. 103-118
16. D.M. Bergeron, T.D. Schroeder, H.A. Martinez , Proactive personality at work: seeing more to do and doing more?, J. Bus. Psychol., 29 (1) (2014), pp. 71-86
17. S. Biswas, J. Bhatnagar , Mediator analysis of employee engagement: role of perceived organizational support, PO fit, organizational commitment and job satisfaction Vikalpa, 38 (1) (2013), pp. 27-40
18. K. Breevaart, A. Bakker, J. Hetland, E. Demerouti, O.K. Olsen, R. Espevik, Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 87 (1) (2014),
pp. 138-157
19. S.A. Carless, A.J. Wearing, L. Mann , A short measure of transformational leadership , J. Bus. Psychol., 14 (3) (2000), pp. 389-405
20. D. Chan , Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes , J. Appl. Psychol., 91 (2) (2006), pp. 475-481
21. M.R. Chernick , Bootstrap Methods: A Guide for Practitioners and Researchers Wiley, New Jersey (2011)
22. W.W. Chin , How to write up and report PLS analyses , V.E. Vinzi, W.W. Chin, J. Henseler, H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares., Springer, Berlin (2010), pp. 655-690
23. J.M. Crant , Proactive behavior in organizations J. Manage., 26 (3) (2000), pp. 435-462
24. J.M. Crant, T.S. Bateman , Charismatic leadership viewed from above: the impact of proactive personality , J. Organ. Behav. (2000), pp. 63-75
25. R. Cropanzano, M.S. Mitchell , Social exchange theory: an interdisciplinary review J. Manage., 31 (6) (2005), pp. 874-900
26. R.J. Deluga , American presidential proactivity, charismatic leadership, and rated performance Leadersh. Q., 9 (3) (1998), pp. 265-291
27. J.S. Dikkers, P.G. Jansen, A.H. de Lange, C.J. Vinkenburg, D. Kooij Proactivity, job characteristics, and engagement: a longitudinal study Career Dev. Int., 15 (1) (2010), pp. 59-77
28. J.E. Dutton, J.M. Dukerich, C.V. Harquail , Organizational images and member identification Admin. Sci. Q. (1994), pp. 239-263
29. O. Epitropaki, R. Martin , From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes , J. Appl. Psychol., 90 (4) (2005), pp. 659-676
30. C. Fornell, D.F. Larcker , Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error , J. Mark. Res., 18 (1) (1981), pp. 39-50
31. B. Fuller, L.E. Marler , Change driven by nature: a meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature , J. Vocat. Behav., 75 (3) (2009), pp. 329-345
32. J.B. Fuller, C.E. Patterson, K. Hester, D.Y. Stringer , A quantitative review of research on charismatic leadership Psychol. Rep., 78 (1) (1996), pp. 271-287
33. M.Y. Ghadi, M. Fernando, P. Caputi , Transformational leadership and work engagement: the mediating effect of meaning in work , Leadersh. Organ. Dev.J., 34 (6) (2013), pp. 532-550
34. P. Ghorbannejad, A. Esakhani , Capacity to engage: studying role of individual differences in work engagement–evidences from Iran , J. Manage. Dev., 35 (9) (2016), pp. 1174-1183
35. J.F. Hair, C.M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt , PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet , J. Market. Theory Pract., 19 (2) (2011), pp. 139-152
36. J.J. Hakanen, W.B. Schaufeli, K. Ahola , The job demands-resources model: a three-year cross-lagged study of burnout, depression, commitment, and work engagement , Work Stress, 22 (3) (2008), pp. 224- 241
37. J.R. Halbesleben, A.R. Wheeler , The relative roles of engagement and embeddedness in predicting job performance and intention to leave , Work Stress, 22 (3) (2008), pp. 242-256
38. H. He, W. Zhu, X. Zheng , Procedural justice and employee engagement: roles of organizational identification and moral identity centrality , J. Bus. Ethics, 122 (4) (2014), pp. 681-695
39. J. Henseler, W.W. Chin , A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling , Struct. Eq. Model., 17 (1) (2010), pp. 82-109
40. J. Henseler, C.M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt , A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance- based structural equation modeling , J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 43 (1) (2015), pp. 115-135
41. M.A. Hogg, J.C. Turner , Interpersonal attraction, social identification and psychological group formation Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 15 (1) (1985), pp. 51-66
42. A.L. Holten, A. Bøllingtoft, I.G. Carneiro, V. Borg , A within-country study of leadership perceptions and outcomes across native and immigrant employees: questioning the universality of transformational leadership J. Manage. Organ., 24 (1) (2018), pp. 145-162
43. T.A. Judge, R.F. Piccolo , Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity , J. Appl. Psychol., 89 (5) (2004), pp. 755-768
44. Karanika-Murray et al., 2015 , M. Karanika-Murray, N. Duncan, H.M. Pontes, M.D. Griffiths Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction J. Manag. Psychol., 30 (8) (2015),
pp. 1019-1033 .
45. O.M. Karatepe , High-performance work practices and hotel employee performance: the mediation of work engagement , Int. J. Hosp. Manage., 32 (2013), pp. 132-140
46. O.M. Karatepe, G. Karadas , Do Psychological capital and work engagement foster frontline employees’ satisfaction? A study in the hotel industry Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manage., 27 (6) (2015), pp. 1254- 1278.
47. O.M. Karatepe, O.A. Olugbade , The mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between high-performance work practices and job outcomes of employees in Nigeria Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manage., 28 (10) (2016), pp. 2350-2371 .
48. O.M. Karatepe, E. Beirami, M. Bouzari, H.P. Safavi , Does work engagement mediate the effects of challenge stressors on job outcomes? evidence from the hotel industry , Int. J. Hosp. Manage., 36 (2014), pp. 14-22
49. R. Kark, B. Shamir, G. Chen , The two faces of transformational leadership: empowerment and dependency , J. Appl. Psychol., 88 (2) (2003), pp. 246-255
50. H. Kim , Transformational leadership, organizational clan culture, organizational affective commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior: a case of South Korea’s public sector Public Organ. Rev., 14 (3) (2014), pp. 397-417
51. N. Kock , Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach Int. J. E-Collab., 11 (4) (2015), pp. 1-10
52. N. Kock, G. Lynn Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: an illustration and recommendations J. Assoc. For. Inform. Syst., 13 (2012), pp. 546-580
53. K.H. Kopperud, Ø. Martinsen, S.I.W. Humborstad , Engaging leaders in the eyes of the beholder: on the relationship between transformational leadership, work engagement, service climate, and self–other agreement , J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud., 21 (1) (2014), pp. 29-42
54. K. Lee, N.J. Allen , Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: the role of affect and cognitions , J. Appl. Psychol., 87 (1) (2002), pp. 131-142
55. J. Lee, C.M. Ok , Hotel employee work engagement and its consequences J. Hosp. Market. Manage., 25
(2) (2016), pp. 133-166
56. M. Li, Z. Wang, J. Gao, X. You , Proactive personality and job satisfaction: the mediating effects of self-efficacy and work engagement in teachers , Curr. Psychol., 36 (1) (2017), pp. 48-55
57. T.L. Liang, H.F. Chang, M.H. Ko, C.W. Lin , Transformational leadership and employee voices in the hospitality industry , Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manage., 29 (1) (2017), pp. 374-392
58. K.B. Lowe, K.G. Kroeck, N. Sivasubramaniam , Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature Leadersh. Q., 7 (3) (1996), pp. 385-425
59. X. Lu, B. Xie, Y. Guo , the trickle-down of work engagement from leader to follower: the roles of optimism and self-efficacy , J. Bus. Res., 84 (2018), pp. 186-195
60. W.H. Macey, B. Schneider , The meaning of employee engagement ,Ind. Organ. Psychol., 1 (1) (2008),
pp. 3-30
61. S.B. MacKenzie, P.M. Podsakoff, G.A. Rich, Transformational and transactional leadership and salesperson performance , J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 29 (2) (2001), pp. 115-134
62. D.P. MacKinnon, C.M. Lockwood, J. Williams , Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods , Multivar. Behav. Res., 39 (1) (2004), pp. 99-128
63. Madera et al., 2017 , J.M. Madera, M. Dawson, P. Guchait, A.M. Belarmino Strategic human resources management research in hospitality and tourism: a review of current literature and suggestions for the future , Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manage., 29 (1) (2017), pp. 48-67
64. F. Mael, B.E. Ashforth , Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification , J. Organ. Behav., 13 (2) (1992), pp. 103-123.
65. C. Nitzl, J.L. Roldan, G. Cepeda , Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models , Ind. Manage. Data Syst., 116 (9) (2016), pp. 1849-1864
66. D.W. Organ , Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome , Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com. (1988)
67. S.Y. Pan, K.J. Lin , Behavioral mechanism and boundary conditions of transformational process J. Manage. Psychol., 30 (8) (2015), pp. 970-985
68. Patiar, Y. Wang , The effects of transformational leadership and organizational commitment on hotel departmental performance , Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manage., 28 (3) (2016), pp. 586-608
69. R.F. Piccolo, J.A. Colquitt , Transformational leadership and job behaviors: the mediating role of core job characteristics , Acad. Manage. J., 49 (2) (2006), pp. 327-340
70. A.N. Pieterse, D. Van Knippenberg, M. Schippers, D. Stam , Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: the moderating role of psychological empowerment , J. Organ. Behav., 31 (4) (2010), pp. 609-623
71. P.M. Podsakoff, S. MacKenzie, J. Lee, N. Podsakoff , Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies , J. Appl. Psychol., 88 (5) (2003), pp. 879- 903
72. N.P. Podsakoff, S.W. Whiting, P.M. Podsakoff, B.D. Blume , Individual-and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: a meta-analysis , J. Appl. Psychol., 94 (1) (2009),
pp. 122-141
73. A.E. Rafferty, M.A. Griffin , Dimensions of transformational leadership: conceptual and empirical extensions, Leadersh. Q., 15 (3) (2004), pp. 329-354
74. B.L. Rich, J.A. Lepine, E.R. Crawford , Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance , Acad. Manage. J., 53 (3) (2010), pp. 617-635
75. M. Riketta ,Organizational identification: a meta-analysis , J. Vocat. Behav., 66 (2) (2005), pp. 358-384
76. M. Riketta, R. Van Dick, Foci of attachment in organizations: a meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment, J. Vocat. Behav., 67 (3) (2005), pp. 490-510
77. J.L. Roldán, M.J. Sánchez-Franco , Variance-based structural equation modeling: guidelines for using partial least squares in information systems research M. Mora, O. Gelman, A. Steenkamp, M.
Raisinghani (Eds.), Research Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems (2012), pp. 193-221 Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA
78. A.M. Saks , Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement , J. Manag. Psychol., 21 (7) (2006), pp. 600-619
79. M. Salanova, L. Lorente, M.J. Chambel, I.M. Martínez , Linking transformational leadership to nurses’ extra‐role performance: the mediating role of self‐efficacy and work engagement , J. Adv. Nurs., 67 (10) (2011), pp. 2256-2266
80. W.B. Schaufeli, A.B. Bakker , Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study , J. Organ. Behav., 25 (3) (2004), pp. 293-315
81. W.B. Schaufeli, M. Salanova, V. González-Romá, A.B. Bakker , The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach , J. Happ. Stud., 3 (1) (2002), pp. 71-92
82. W.B. Schaufeli, A.B. Bakker, M. Salanova , The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study , Educ. Psychol. Meas., 66 (4) (2006), pp. 701-716
83. S.E. Seibert, M.L. Kraimer, J.M. Crant , What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success ,Personn. Psychol., 54 (4) (2001), pp. 845-974
84. Shimazu, W.B. Schaufeli, S. Kosugi, A. Suzuki, H. Nashiwa, A. Kato , work engagement in Japan: validation of the Japanese version of the Utrecht work engagement scale , Appl. Psychol., 57 (3) (2008),
pp. 510-523
85. T. Slåtten, M. Mehmetoglu , Antecedents and effects of engaged frontline employees: a study from the hospitality industry , Manag. Serv. Qual.: An. Int. J., 21 (1) (2011), pp. 88-107
86. D.M. Sluss, B.E. Ashforth , Relational identity and identification: defining ourselves through work relationships , Acad. Manage. Rev., 32 (1) (2007), pp. 9-32
87. Smidts, A.T.H. Pruyn, C.B. Van Riel , The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification , Acad. Manage. J., 44 (5) (2001), pp. 1051-1062
88. H. Tajfel , The achievement of group differentiation , H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations., Academic Press, London (1978), pp. 77-98
89. K. Terglav, M.K. Ruzzier, R. Kaše , Internal branding process: exploring the role of mediators in top management’s leadership–commitment relationship , Int. J. Hosp. Manage., 54 (2016), pp. 1-11
90. J.P. Thomas, D.S. Whitman, C. Viswesvaran , Employee proactivity in organizations: a comparative meta‐analysis of emergent proactive constructs , J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 83 (2) (2010), pp. 275-300
91. M. Tims, A.B. Bakker, D. Xanthopoulou, Do Transformational leaders enhance their followers’ daily work engagement? , Leadersh. Q., 22 (1) (2011), pp. 121-131
92. H.H.M. Tse, W.C.K. Chiu , Transformational leadership and job performance: a social identity perspective J. Bus. Res., 67 (2014), pp. 2827-2835
93. Van Dick et al., 2004 , R. Van Dick, O. Christ, J. Stellmacher, U. Wagner, O. Ahlswede, C. Grubba, M. Hauptmeier, C. Höhfeld, K. Moltzen, P.A. Tissington , Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational identification and job satisfaction Br. J. Manage., 15 (4) (2004),
pp. 351-360.
94. R. Van Dick, M.W. Grojean, O. Christ, J. Wieseke , Identity and the extra mile: relationships between organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior , Br. J. Manage., 17 (4) (2006), pp. 283-301
95. R. Van Dick, D. van Knippenberg, R. Kerschreiter, G. Hertel, J. Wieseke , Interactive effects of work group and organizational identification on job satisfaction and extra-role behavior , J. Vocat. Behav., 72
(3) (2008), pp. 388-399
96. D. Van Knippenberg , Work motivation and performance: a social identity perspective , Appl. Psychol., 49 (3) (2000), pp. 357-371
97. D. Van Knippenberg, E. Sleebos , Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: self‐definition, social exchange, and job attitudes , J. Organ. Behav., 27 (5) (2006), pp. 571-584
98. D. Van Knippenberg, B. Van Knippenberg, D. De Cremer, M.A. Hogg , Leadership, self, and identity: a review and research agenda , The Leadersh. Q., 15 (6) (2004), pp. 825-856
99. G. Viglia, R. Furlan, A. Ladron-de-Guevara , Please, talk about it! When hotel popularity boosts preferences , Int. J. Hosp. Manage., 42 (2014), pp. 155-164
100. E. Wallace, L. de Chernatony, I. Buil , Building bank brands: how leadership behavior influences employee commitment, J. Bus. Res., 66 (2) (2013), pp. 165-171
101. F.O. Walumbwa, C.A. Hartnell , Understanding transformational leadership–employee performance links: the role of relational identification and self‐efficacy , J. Occup. Organ. Psychol., 84 (1) (2011), pp. 153-172
102. F.O. Walumbwa, B.J. Avolio, W. Zhu , How transformational leadership weaves its influence on individual job performance: the role of identification and efficacy beliefs , Personn. Psychol., 61 (4) (2008), pp. 793-825
103. F.O. Walumbwa, D.M. Mayer, P. Wang, H. Wang, K. Workman, A.L. Christensen , Linking ethical leadership to employee performance: the roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy, and organizational identification , Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 115 (2) (2011), pp. 204-213
104. H. Wang, K.S. Law, R.D. Hackett, D. Wang, Z.X. Chen , Leader-member exchange as a mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ performance and organizational citizenship behavior , Acad. Manage. J., 48 (3) (2005), pp. 420-432
105. M. Wetzels, G. Odekerken-Schröder, C. Van Oppen , MIS quarterly , Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration (2009), pp. 177-195
106. L.J. Williams, S.E. Anderson , Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors, J. Manage., 17 (3) (1991), pp. 601-617
107. G. Yukl , An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories , Leadersh. Q., 10 (2) (1999), pp. 285-305
108. S.J. Zaccaro , Individual differences and leadership: contributions to a third tipping point , Leadersh. Q., 23 (4) (2012), pp. 718-728
109. Y. Zhang, Y. Guo, A. Newman , Identity judgements, work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior: the mediating effects based on group engagement model , Tour. Manage., 61 (2017), pp. 190- 197
110. W. Zhu, B.J. Avolio, F.O. Walumbwa , Moderating role of follower characteristics with transformational leadership and follower work engagement, Group Organ. Manage., 34 (5) (2009), pp. 590-619.
111. Bhavna shah, darshinipandya, hirenpatel, amareayalew,ajay shah (2016) zeolitic composites from agricultural detritus for pollution remedy: a review. Journal of Critical Reviews, 3 (3), 41-49.
112. Husain, S. Universal Field of Quantum Consciousness: An Ontological Nexus of Classical and Quantum Physics (2010) NeuroQuantology, 8 (3), pp. 279-286.
113. Başar, E. From "Quantum Mechanics to the Quantum Brain" (2010) NeuroQuantology, 8 (3), pp. 319- 321.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
