PREDICTING UNIVERSITY DROPOUT STUDENTS THROUGH DATA ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Mahesh M. UG Scholar, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai Author
  • Sindhu G. Assistant Professor, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/fq85pn34

Keywords:

predicting university dropout students through data analysis

Abstract

University dropout will affect all university students in the world, with consequences such as reduced registration, reduced revenue for the university, losing the money for the state that funds the studies, and joining the university constitutes a social effect for college students, their families, and also society. The importance of predicting university dropout is finding the dropout students before leaving the college so as to style methods to tackle the effects of it. By proofing the large knowledge technology to store the students attendance, checking marks, and communication skills to find the exact student future Marks who has got the highest marks from the dropout students. We are trying to use different kinds of learning systems to remove the most choices of being dropouts. This may reduce the dropout rates of the university students and their total marks. As well as finding and detailing the efficiency of a comparative study with finding the most effective accuracy applied in varied supervised machine learning techniques through the given dataset with interface-based mostly application by given dataset. Decades of analysis on artificial neural networks (ANNs) have published the thought that ANNs square measure per sensitive to missing/incomplete inputs at prediction time. Studies on dependable ANNs show that a neural network can’t be thought of as in and of itself fault-tolerant, and it’s unimaginable to induce complete error masking once a fault occurs, even within the presence of learning. Specific methodologies and neural design have, thus, been planned to enforce fault tolerance, however largely restricted to failure in hidden neurons. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. A. Kumar and R. Jain, “Faculty Evaluation System," Procedia Computer Science, 125, pp. 533-541, 2018.

2. B. Wang and M. Liu, “Deep Learning for sentiment analysis,” Stanford University report, vol. 10, no. 12.

pp.701-719, 2016.

3. [3] L. M. Rojas-Barahona, “Deep learning for sentiment analysis," Language and linguistics compass, vol.

10, no. 12 pp.

4. J. Schmidhuler, “Long Short-Term Memory," Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735-1780, 1997.

5. Y. Ding, J. Yu, & J. Jiang, “Recurrent Neural Networks with Auxiliary Labels for cross-domain opinion

target extraction”, Aaai, 3436-3442, 2017.

6. D. A. Kaufmann, “Reflection: Benefits of Gamification in Online Higher Education." Journal of

Instructional Research, vol. 7, pp. 125-132, 2018.

7. D. Chalmers and R. Fuller, Teaching for Learning at University. Routledge, 2012.

8. I. Barker, “Find the time for slow education, “The Times Educational Supplement Scotland, vol. 2290, pp. 26. 2012.

9. A. Veiga and A. Amaral, “Soft law and the implementation problems of the Bologna process.” Educacaco, Sciedade & Culturals, vol. 36, 2012.

10.D. Dicheva, C. Dicheva, G. Agre, G. Angelova et al., “Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study.” Educational Technology & Society, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 75-88, 2015.

Downloads

Published

31.05.2020

How to Cite

M. , M., & G. , S. (2020). PREDICTING UNIVERSITY DROPOUT STUDENTS THROUGH DATA ANALYSIS. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 4041-4044. https://doi.org/10.61841/fq85pn34