Effectiveness of syntactical teaching books judging on content feasibility, serving, language and graphic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/9djq5y86Keywords:
effectiveness,, eligibility,, -language, syntactic,, teaching books.Abstract
The main objective of this study is to describe the effectiveness of the syntax of the syntactic (grammar) of the content of the type, unity, and sentence structure; eligibility, language worthiness, and graphic eligibility for elementary school students in Bali province. The data source used to be the subject in this research is the expert and practitioner/teacher of Grade VI Elementary School in Bali province. Meanwhile, the object of this research is the effectiveness of the syntax teaching book which includes elements: content feasibility, presentational feasibility, language worthiness, and grafapia eligibility. The method used to collect data is a poll method/questionnaire. The collected data is analyzed by a descriptive-qualitative technique. The results showed that the aspects of the teaching books 'Grammar of the Indonesian Elementary School' which has received (1) eligibility, (2) Eligibility of content (type, unity, and sentence structure), (3) language eligibility, and (4) Eligibility the graphic is very good or very valid.
Downloads
References
1. Akpomedaye, E. (2019). Assessment of information and communication technology application in the teaching of office technology and management students in delta state polytechnics. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(3), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n3.342
2. Aryani, I. G. A. I., &Rahayuni, N. K. S. (2016). Innovation of teaching and learning english applied to animal sciences’ student with the combination of computer media and audio visual. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(1), 1-7.
3. Baryadi, I. P. (2007). UrutanKlausadalamKalimatMajemukSubordinatif Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian dariPerspektifSintaksis dan Wacana. JurnalHumaniora, 19(3), 224-231.https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.906
4. Batterink, L., & Neville, H. J. (2013). The human brain processes syntax in the absence of conscious awareness. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(19), 8528-8533. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0618- 13.2013
5. Clifton. Jr, C. E., & Frazier, L. (2010). Imperfect ellipsis: Antecedents beyond syntax?. Syntax, 13(4), 279-297.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00142.x
6. Collins, C., & Stabler, E. (2016). A formalization of minimalist syntax. Syntax, 19(1), 43-
78.https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12117
7. Djahimo, S., Bili Bora, D., & Huan, E. (2018). Student anxiety and their speaking performance: teaching EFL to Indonesian student. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(3), 187-195. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v2n3.235
8. Hakim, L. (2016). Transitivity system in bangkeoros text and its’ relevancy toward indonesian teaching and learning at senior high school. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(3), 35- 44.
9. Ihde, T. (2000). Curriculum development and textbook design for North American learners of Irish. Language Culture and Curriculum, 13(1), 1-12.https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666586
10. Keohin, H. C., & Graw, N. J. (2017). Linguistic and cognitive ability of children before five years old on their effort to communicate action. Linguistics and Culture Review, 1(1), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v1n1.5
11. Kumar, S. S., Kumar, R. S., & Sankar, G. (2016). Creative thinking of English language teaching to the secondary language learners. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(4), 150-155.
12. Liu, S., & Alley, F. (2019). Learning from the historical culture of American people for the current society. Linguistics and Culture Review, 3(1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v3n1.14
13. Luqman. (2012). Komponen dan Jenis-jenisBahan Ajar.
http://luqmanmaniabgt.blogspot.com/2012/05/komponen-dan-jenis-bahan-ajar.html.
14. Maimunah, S. (2014). Analisisklausaberdasarkanfungsi, kategori, dan peran pada terjemahan Surah Al- Qaria’ah Ayat 1-11. JurnalSintaksisLanjut.
15. Osborne, T., Putnam, M., &Groß, T. (2012). Catenae: Introducing a novel unit of syntactic analysis. Syntax, 15(4), 354-396.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2012.00172.x
16. Peniro, R., &Cyntas, J. (2019). Applied linguistics theory and application. Linguistics and Culture Review, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v3n1.7
17. Putrayasa, I. B. (2001). Penerapan model inkuiridalampembelajaranbahasa Indonesia. Disertasi. Bandung: UPI Bandung.
18. Putrayasa, I. B. (2005). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia BerbasisInquiridalamUpayaMeningkatkanAktivitas, Kreativitas, dan Logikalitas. DisertasidisajikandalamOrasiPengenalan Guru BesarTetapDalamBidang Bahasa Indonesia pada Fakultas Pendidikan Bahasa dan Seni IKIP Negeri Singaraja.
19. Putrayasa, I. B. (2008). Kajian morfologi: bentukderivasional dan infeksional. RefikaAditama.
20. Putrayasa, I. B. (2011). StudiPenelusuranMiskonsepsidalamPembelajaranSintaksis (Tata Kalimat) dengan Model KonstruktivismeBerpendekatanInkuiri pada Siswa Kelas I SMPN di Kota Singaraja, KabupatenBuleleng, Provinsi Bali. ProsidingKonferensiInternasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia– KIMLI.
21. Putrayasa, I. B. (2012). Buku ajar landasanpembelajaran. Denpasar: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
22. Putrayasa, I. B. (2013). LandasanPembelajaran. Singaraja, Bali: UNDIKSHA Press. Tersediasecara online di: http://pasca. undiksha. ac. id/media/1227. pdf [diakses di Kota Malang, Indonesia: 2 Maret 2017].
23. Putrayasa, I. B. (2015, September). Pembelajaranbahasa Indonesia (kalimat: unsurobjek dan adverbial) dengan model konstruktivismeberpendekataninkuiri. In Prosiding Seminar Internasional, Malang (pp. 28- 29).
24. Putrayasa, I. B. (2017). Unity and effectiveness of the abstract language beginner lecturer research institution (Undiksha) 2015. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS). V0l, 22, 23- 28.
25. Putrayasa, I. B. (2019). Syntactical analysis of essays. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 156-164. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n2.307
26. Putrayasa, I. B., & Atif, N. F. (2009). JenisKalimatdalam Bahasa Indonesia. RefikaAditama.
27. Putrayasa, I. B., & Susana, A. (2007). AnalisisKalimat (fungsi, kategori, dan peran). RefikaAditama.
28. Putrayasa, I. B., & Susana, A. (2007). Kalimatefektif:(diksi, struktur, dan logika). RefikaAditama.
29. Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B. J., &Liversedge, S. P. (2004). The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1290.
30. Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2010). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. Routledge.
31. Robert-Burton, N. (1997). Analysing sentences.
32. Sabilah, F. (2016). Teaching techniques and instructional media in presenting intercultural awareness in English class of primary school students. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 2(4), 112-121.
33. Thiagarajan, S. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook.
34. Vowel, G. E., Gorray, D. K., & Audrey, N. (2017). Stylistics on the linguistics text applied in a social approach to get a certain goal. Linguistics and Culture Review, 1(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v1n1.4
35. Widiasri, D. A., Budiarsa, M., Sudipa, I. N., &Satyawati, M. S. (2019). Speech act in Indonesian language teaching: an ethnography communication study. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 5(5), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijllc.v5n5.740
36. Woods, A. (2018). American culture: A sociological perspectives. Linguistics and Culture Review, 2(1), 1-
12. https://doi.org/10.37028/lingcure.v2n1.6
37. Jadeja, Siddharth, Girish Pai, Krishnamurthy Bhat, and MuddukrishnaBadamaneSathyanarayana. "President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief." Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy 9.1 (2018), 6-9. Print. doi:10.5530/srp.2018.1.2
38. Erol, M.Schrödinger wave equation and function: Basics and concise relations with consciousness/mind(2010) NeuroQuantology, 8 (1), pp. 101-109.
39. Mender, D.Post-classical phase transitions and emergence in psychiatry: Beyond George Engel's model of psychopathology(2010) NeuroQuantology, 8 (1), pp. 29-36.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
