Innovative Method of Developing Professional Ideas of High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/h2n3jq82Keywords:
High School Students, Professional Ideas, Program, Methodology, Methodological DevelopmentAbstract
The paper presents data on the features of professional ideas of high school students. The specific characteristics of professional ideas are revealed in interaction with professional orientations of a personality. In the authors’ opinion, researching the professional ideas of high school students is an indispensable condition for forming adequate self-determination and choice of profession in accordance with the personal components of an individual. The authors thoroughly selected the methodological tools and designed an innovative program aimed at developing, actualizing, and correcting the professional ideas of high school students. As a result of the research and analysis of data, the authors identified the features of professional ideas of high school students and revealed the qualitative specificity of the characteristics of professional ideas of high school students in interaction with various professional orientations of a personality. It is marked that the obtained results can be used to increase the efficiency of the educational process. The conclusion is made that there is qualitative specificity in the professional ideas of high school students belonging to various groups of professional orientation.
Downloads
References
[1] Affrunti, N.W., Mehta, T., Rusch, D., & Frazier, S. (2018). Job demands, resources, and stress among staff
in after school programs: neighborhood characteristics influence associations in the job demands-resources
modelю Children and Youth Services Review, 88, 366–374.
[2] Bachmann, T. & Sikka, P. (2005). Perception of successive targets presented in invariant-item streams.
Acta Psychologica, 120(1), 19–34.
[3] Barnhardt, B. & Ginns, P. (2017). Psychological teaching-learning contracts: academic integrity and moral
psychology. Ethics and Behavior, 27(4), 313–334.
[4] Bong, M. & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: how different are they
really? Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 1–40.
[5] Brush, D. H. & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (2009). Interrelationships among interests, life-history, and educational
criteria. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3(2), 165–175.
[6] Burke, M. J. (1982). A path analytic model of the direct and indirect effects of mathematical aptitude and
academic orientation on high school and college performance. Educational and Psychological
Measurement, 42(2), 545–550.
[7] Chen, Y., Li, X., Liu, J., & Ying, Z. (2017). Recommendation System for Adaptive Learning. Applied
Psychological Measurement, 42(1), 24–41.
[8] Dolan, L. J. (2003). Validity analyses for the school attitude measures at three grade levels. Educational
and Psychological Measurement, 43(1), 295–303.
[9] Edwards, Ja. E. & Waters, L. K. (1981). Moderating effect of achievement motivation and locus of control
on the relationship between academic ability and academic performance. Educational and Psychological
Measurement, 41(2), 585–587.
[10] Galassi, J. P., Brooks, L., Stoltz, R. F., & Trexler, K. A. (1986). Research training environments and
student productivity. An exploratory study. Counseling Psychologist, 14(1), 31–36.
[11] Gaponova, S. A. & Martynova, N. A. (2003). The dependence of the dynamics of mental states of adult
learners on the methods of presentation of information. Psychological journal, 24(6), 86–94.
[12] Gargallo, B., Morera, I., & García, E. (2015). Innovative methodology at the university. Its effects on
learning processes of university students. Anales de Psicologia, 31(3), 901–915.
[13] Halamish, V., Borovoi, L., & Liberman, N. (2017) The antecedents and consequences of a beyond-choice
view of decision situations: A construal level theory perspective. Acta Psychologica, 173, 41–45.
[14] Kelsen, B. A. & Liang, H. Y. (2018). Role of the big five personality traits and motivation in predicting
performance in collaborative presentations. Psychological Reports.
[15] Knapp, L. & Michael, W. B. (2001). Relationship of work values to corresponding academic success.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(2), 487–494.
[16] Magnus, J. R. & Peresetsky, A. A. (2018). Grade expectations: rationality and overconfidence. Frontiers in
Psychology, 8, 2346.
[17] Mccabe, R. E., Blankstein, K. R., & Mills, J. S. (1999). Interpersonal sensitivity and social problemsolving: relations with academic and social self-esteem, depressive symptoms, and academic performance.
Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23(6), 587–604.
[18] Pintrich, P. R. (2010). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In: M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich,
& M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 451–502). California: Academic Press.
[19] Poropat, A. E. (2011). The eysenckian personality factors and their correlations with academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 41–58.
[20] Raymond, M. R., Harik, P., & Clauser, B. E. (2011). The Impact of Statistically Adjusting for Rater Effects
on Conditional Standard Errors of Performance Ratings. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(3), 235–
246.
[21] Vitulić, H. S. & Zupančič, M. (2014). Robust and specific personality traits as predictors of adolescents'
final grades and GPA at the end of compulsory schooling. European Journal of Psychology of Education,
28(4), 1181–1199.
[22] Wentzel, K. R. & Wigfield, A. (1998). Academic and social motivational influences on students' academic
performance. Educational Psychology Review, 10(2), 155–175.
[23] Xiong, X. (2018). A Hybrid Strategy to Construct Multistage Adaptive Tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 014662161876273.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
