Dividend Price Ratio and Stock Return: Evidence from Pakistan, India and China

Authors

  • Shazia Baloch Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Shaheed Benazir Abad, Pakistan. Author
  • Muhammad Hafeez Department of Business Administration & Putra Business School, Shaheed Benazir Bhutto University, Shaheed Benazirabad, Pakistan & University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia Author
  • Maeenuddin PhD Scholars, Putra Business School, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia. Author
  • Ashfaq Ahmad PhD Scholars, Putra Business School, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia. Author
  • Asma Javed Virtual University of Pakistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/2gt27618

Keywords:

Bombay Stock Exchange, Dividend Premium, Fama and French, GARCH Model, Karachi Stock Exchange, Ordinary Least Square, Price Earnings Ratio, Taiwan Economic Journal

Abstract

This study estimated the effect of dividend premium and size in the growing capitalization markets of Pakistan, India, and China. This paper examined the role of dividend in the terms of large and small firms and to correlate the dividend with stock returns. This study used monthly closing prices of 40 non-financial sector firms listed at Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE) for Pakistan, 40 from the Taiwan Economic Journal Database (TEJ) for China, and 40 from the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) for India for the period of 2004 to 2014 based on market capitalization. Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis have been used to examine the relationship between the independent variables market premium (MKT), size premium (SMB), dividend premium (LMH), and dependent variable stock return. Results from the descriptive statistics of Fama and French three factors show that Pakistan has the highest mean value of marke premium and dividend premium, while India has the highest mean value of size premium. Results of standard deviation show that India has the lowest value of standard deviation of market premium and size premium, while China has the lowest value of SD for dividend premium. As per the results of the correlation analysis, Pakistan has the strongest negative relationship between dividend premium (LMH) and market premium (MKT), between dividend premium and size premium, and between size premium and market premium as compared to India and China. The results revealed the positive relationship between stock returns and dividends in the rapidly growing markets of Pakistan, India, and China. From the overall results, we concluded and suggest that strategies of investment would be schemed by the investors on the basis of the size, market premium, and dividend premium. The consequences of the study disclosed the positive relationship between stock returns and dividends in the rapidly growing markets of Pakistan, India, and China. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Benz, R.W. (1981). The Relationship between Return and Market Value. Journal of Financial Economics,

3-18.

[2] BREEDEN, D. T., GIBBONS, M. R., & LITZENBERGER, R. H. (1989). Empirical Tests of the

Consumption-Oriented CAPM. The Journal of Finance, 44 (2), 231-262.

[3] Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. The Journal of Finace, 57, 57-82.

[4] Chan, L. K., Hamao, Y., & Lakonishok, J. (1991). Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan. The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1739-1764

[5] Chen, L., Novy-Marx, R., & Zhang, L. (2010).An alternative three-factor model.Available at SSRN

1418117.

[6] Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: empirical tests. The Journal of Political

Economy, 607-636.

[7] Fama, E. F., & MacBeth, J. D. (1973). Risk, return, and equilibrium: empirical tests. The Journal of Political

Economy, 607-636.

[8] Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross-section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance,

47(2), 427-465.

[9] Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993).Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of

financial economics, 33(1), 3-56.

[10] Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1995). Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. The Journal of

Finance, 50(1), 131-155.

[11] Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1995).Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. The Journal of

Finance, 50(1), 131-155.

[12] Fama, E. F. & French, K. R. (1996). Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. The journal of finance, 51(1), 55-84.

[13] Fama, E. F. and K. R. French (2015). A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics 116 (1), 1–22.

[14] Febrian, E., and Herwany, A. (2010). „THE PERFORMANCE OF ASSET PRICING MODELS BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER AN EMERGING MARKET FINANCIAL CRISIS: EVIDENCE FROM

INDONESIA. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, Volume 4, Number 1, 2010.

[15] Griffin, J. M. & Lemmon, M. L. (2002). Book-to-market equity, distress risk, and stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 57(5), 2317-2336.

[16] Gruber, M. J., & Ross, S. A. (1978). THE CURRENT STATUS OF THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICE

MODEL (CAPM). The Journal of Finance, 33 (3), 885-901.

[17] Hassan, A., & Javed, M. T. (2011). Size and value premium in Pakistani equity market. African Journal of Business Management, 5(16), 6747-6755.

[18] Homsud, N., Wasunsakul, J., Phuangnark, S., & Joongpong, J. (2009). A study of Fama and French three factors model and capital asset pricing model in the stock exchange of Thailand. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 25, 31–40.

[19] HUBERMAN, G., KANDEL, S., & STAMBAUGH, R. F. (1987). Mimicking Portfolios and Exact Arbitrage

Pricing. The Journal of Finance, 1-9.

[20] John Y. Campbell and Robert J. Shiller, "Cointegration and Tests of Present Value Models," Journal of

Political Economy 95, no. 5 (Oct., 1987): 1062-1088

[21] Kasa, K. (1992). Common stochastic trends in international stock markets. Journal of Monetary Economics,

29 (1), 95-124.

[22] Khan, K. I. (2012). Effect of Dividends on Stock Prices: A Case of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industry of

Pakistan. Management, 2 (5), 141-148.

[23] Lintner, J. (1965). The Valuation of Risk Assets and The Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. Rev. Econ, and Statis., 13-37.

[24] Markowitz, H. (1956). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7 (1), 77-91.

[25] Markowitz, 1959. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. New York: John Wiley &

Sons.

[26] Mirza, N. & Shahid, S. (2008). Size and value premium in Karachi stock exchange. Lahore Journal of

Economics, 13(2), 1–26.

[27] Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrics: journal of the Econometric

Society,768-783.

[28] Reinganum, M. R. (1981). Misspecification of capital asset pricing: Empirical anomalies based on earnings'

yields and market values. Journal of Financial Economics, 9 (1), 19-46.

[29] Reinganum, M. R. (1983). The anomalous stock market behavior of small firms in January: Empirical tests

for tax-loss selling effects. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(1), 89-104.

[30] Ross, S. A. (1976). The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. Journal of economic theory, 13(3), 341-360.

[31] Sharpe, W. F. (1964). ''Capital Assets Prices: A Theory of Market Equalibrium under Condition of Risk''. The Journal of Finance, 425-42.

[32] Tobin, James. 1958. “Liquidity Preference as Behavior towards Risk.” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 25, no. 1 (February): 65–86

[33] Treynor, J. (1965). How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review, 43, 63-75.

Downloads

Published

31.05.2020

How to Cite

Baloch, S., Hafeez, M., Maeenuddin, Ahmad, A., & Javed, A. (2020). Dividend Price Ratio and Stock Return: Evidence from Pakistan, India and China. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 2784-2796. https://doi.org/10.61841/2gt27618