Strategies Concerning Synergistic Development between Scientific Journals and Academic Communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/46vnww51Keywords:
Synergistic Development, Scientific Journals, Academic CommunitiesAbstract
This research aims to undertake a comprehensive overview of how scientific journals interact with academic communities, comparing them to academic communities. This research investigated the salient features of Chinese scientific journals in relation to academic communities, , entailing a systematic approach to overseas literature review, translation, analysis, and synthesis of the attributes of academic communities. The conclusions underscore the necessity for: (1) Enhancing the formation of academic communities through the demarcation of academic resources and enhancement of dissemination frameworks; (2) Catalyzing the evolution of academic communities via the institution of governance and augmentation; (3) Amplifying the cohesive attraction of academic communities by guiding research directions and diversifying resource capabilities; (4) Elevating the impact of academic communities on scientific journals. In conclusion, global scientific journals are positioned to construct and nurture academic communities that resonate with their distinctive professional identities, thereby utilizing collective synergy to enhance the overall impact of scientific journals.
Downloads
References
Abalkina, and A. 2021. Detecting a Network of Hijacked Journals by Its Archive. Scientometrics 126 (8). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:7123-7148. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04056-0.
Akça, S., Akbulut, and M. 2021. Are Predatory Journals Contaminating Science? An Analysis on the Cabells’ Predatory Report. Journal of Academic Librarianship 47 (4). Elsevier BV:11. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102366.
Allen, B. L., Sutton, and B. 1993. Exploring the Intellectual Organization of an Interdisciplinary Research Institute. College & Research Libraries 54 (6). American Library Association:499-515. doi:10.5860/crl_54_06_499.
Azizi, M., Abdi, J., Gholami, and J. 2022. Exploration of Value Arguments in Applied Linguistics Research Articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 59 (January). Elsevier BV:12. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101161.
Burright, M. A., Hahn, T. B., Antonisse, and M. J. 2005. Understanding Information Use in a Multidisciplinary Field: A Local Citation Analysis of Neuroscience Research. College & Research Libraries 66 (3). American Library Association:198-210. doi:10.5860/crl.66.3.198.
Chen, C. F., Li, Q., Deng, Z. Q., Chiu, K., Wang, and P. 2018. The Preferences of Chinese LIS Journal Articles in Citing Works Outside the Discipline. Journal of Documentation 74 (1). Emerald:99-118. doi:10.1108/jd-04-2017-0057.
Cislak, A., Formanowicz, M., Saguy, and T. 2018. Bias against Research on Gender Bias. Scientometrics 115 (1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:189-200. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2667-0.
Ebadi, S., Ashtarian, S., Zamani, and G. 2020. Exploring Arguments Presented in Predatory Journals Using Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation. Journal of Academic Ethics 18 (4). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:435-449. doi:10.1007/s10805-019-09346-0.
Enk, van, A., Power, and K. 2017. What Is a Research Article?: Genre Variability and Data Selection in Genre Research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 29 (January). Elsevier BV:1-11. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2017.07.002.
Harzing, A. W., Mijnhardt, and W. 2015. Proof over Promise: Towards a More Inclusive Ranking of Dutch Academics in Economics & Business. Scientometrics 102 (1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:727-749. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1370-z.
Hayes, V., Williams, E., Fairfield, K. M., Falank, C., McKelvy, D., et al. 2021. Impact of a New Institutional Medical Journal on Professional Identity Development and Academic Cultural Change: A Qualitative Study. Learned Publishing 34 (4). Wiley:602-611. doi:10.1002/leap.1407.
Huang, R. H., Huang, Y. T., Qi, F., Shi, L. Y., Li, B. Y., et al. 2022. Exploring the Characteristics of Special Issues: Distribution, Topicality, and Citation Impact. Scientometrics 127 (9). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:5233-5256. doi:10.1007/s11192-022-04384-9.
Jesus, de, I. R. D., Costa, and H. G. 2015. Interfaces between Production Engineering and the Public Affairs: Evidences from Bibliometric Analysis. Scientometrics 105 (2). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:1183-1193. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1724-1.
Jiang, X. H., Wang, and D. 2023. Enhancing Journal Reputation and Academic Socialization: Review Feedback Matters beyond Its Gatekeeping Function. Learned Publishing 36 (4). Wiley:506-516. doi:10.1002/leap.1577.
Johnston, and C. 1998. Electronic Technology and Its Impact on Libraries. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 30 (1):7-24. ://WOS:000072950800002.
Kim, E., Kim, and E. S. 2020. A Critical Examination of International Research Conducted by North Korean Authors: Increasing Trends of Collaborative Research between China and North Korea. Scientometrics 124 (1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:429-450. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03461-1.
Krawczyk, F., Kulczycki, and E. 2021. How Is Open Access Accused of Being Predatory? The Impact of Beall’s Lists of Predatory Journals on Academic Publishing. Journal of Academic Librarianship 47 (2). Elsevier BV:11. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102271.
Lin, and W. Y. C. 2020. Self-Plagiarism in Academic Journal Articles: From the Perspectives of International Editors-in-Chief in Editorial and COPE Case. Scientometrics 123 (1). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:299-319. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03373-0.
Nguyen, T. T. H., Pham, H. H., Vuong, Q. H., Cao, Q. T., Dinh, V. H., et al. 2021. The Adoption of International Publishing within Vietnamese Academia from 1986 to 2020: A Review. Learned Publishing 34 (2). Wiley:175-186. doi:10.1002/leap.1340.
Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R., Rowlands, I., Fieldhouse, and M. 2009. Student Digital Information‐seeking Behaviour in Context. Journal of Documentation 65 (1). Emerald:106-132. doi:10.1108/00220410910926149.
Parameswaran, A., Sebastian, and R. 2006. The Value of South and Southeast Asian Studies Journal Rankings. Serials Review 32 (3). Informa UK Limited:154-163. doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2006.04.001.
Schaffer, A., Calkin, N., Echt, and R. 1996. Scholarly Journals at the Crossroads. Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary Conference of the North-American-Serials-Interest-Group 28 (January). Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd:355-359. doi:10.1300/J123v28n03_23.
Spezi, V., Wakeling, S., Pinfield, S., Creaser, C., Fry, J., et al. 2017. Open-Access Mega-Journals. Journal of Documentation 73 (2). Emerald:263-283. doi:10.1108/jd-06-2016-0082.
Thelwall, and M. 2021. Alternative Medicines Worth Researching? Citation Analyses of Acupuncture, Chiropractic, Homeopathy, and Osteopathy 1996–2017. Scientometrics 126 (10). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:8731-8747. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04145-0.
Veretennik, E., Yudkevich, and M. 2023. Inconsistent Quality Signals: Evidence from the Regional Journals. Scientometrics 128 (6). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:3675-3701. doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04723-4.
Wang, S. H., Weldon, and P. R. 2006. Chinese Academic Journals: Quality, Issues and Solutions. Learned Publishing 19 (2). Wiley:97-+. doi:10.1087/095315106776386995.
Wenzler, and J. 2017. Scholarly Communication and the Dilemma of Collective Action: Why Academic Journals Cost Too Much. College & Research Libraries 78 (2). American Library Association:183-200. doi:10.5860/crl.78.2.183.
Xiao, L., Askin, and N. 2012. Wikipedia for Academic Publishing: Advantages and Challenges. Online Information Review 36 (3). Emerald:359-373. doi:10.1108/14684521211241396.
Xiao, L., Askin, and N. 2014. Academic Opinions of Wikipedia and Open Access Publishing. Online Information Review 38 (3). Emerald:332-347. doi:10.1108/oir-04-2013-0062.
Yamada, Y., da Silva, and J. T. 2023. Academia Letters: Examination of an “Experimental” Academia.Edu Publishing Model. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 54 (1). University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress):103-120. doi:10.3138/jsp-2022-0028.
Yu, G., Yang, D. H., He, and H. X. 2021. An Automatic Recognition Method of Journal Impact Factor Manipulation. Journal of Information Science 37 (3). SAGE Publications:235-245. doi:10.1177/0165551511400954.
Yue, M. L., Tang, H. B., Liu, F., Ma, and T. C. 2021. Consistency Index: Measuring the Performances of Scholar Journal Reviewers. Scientometrics 126 (8). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:7183-7195. doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04013-x.
Zheng, J., Gong, J. Y., Li, R., Hu, K., Wu, H. Y., et al. 2017. Community Evolution Analysis Based on Co-Author Network: A Case Study of Academic Communities of the Journal of “Annals of the Association of American Geographers.” Scientometrics 113 (2). Springer Science and Business Media LLC:845-865. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2515-7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Xue Li, Jing Zhou, Yingchun Han, Chu Pei, Xiufen Long, Wushuang Li, Han Wang, Zehua Li (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.