Comparative Analysis on the Board and Academic Performances of BS Criminology Graduates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/m11d1f44Keywords:
Comparative Analysis, Board Exam, Academic Performance, Republic Act 6506, CMO #21, Academic CompetenciesAbstract
The College of Criminal Justice Education of Cagayan State University Piat Campus offering the Criminology Program is mandated to comply with the requirements. The licensure examination results speak of the preparedness of students in taking the examination, the quality of instruction by the faculty and the exposure of the students to practical learning experiences through the equipment and apparatuses provided by the administration. The conduct of this research aimed to make a comparative analysis on the board and academic performances of BS Criminology graduates of 2016 and 2017, CSU Piat, Cagayan. This study used the descriptive normative survey method utilizing documentary analysis as a technique in gathering the required data. Reference.com defines that descriptive-normative survey combines two research methods which involve the gathering of information to describe the object of study as it is, has been or is viewed, which is the descriptive method, and the critiquing of the object to identify ways to improve it, the normative method. The respondents were the graduates from the College of Criminal Justice Education at Cagayan State University Piat Campus in the school years 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. Total enumeration was employed in selecting the 49 respondents who took the Criminologist Licensure Examination (CLE) administered by the Professional Regulation Commission. From the findings of the study, it can be concluded that the general weighted average of graduates in the six subject areas are correlated with the results of the board examination as well as the identified factors attributed to the passing or failing in the board examination and that the researcher strongly recommends that the Faculty members should regularly update their knowledge and competencies along with the subject areas being handled to contribute to the increase passing rate, enforce a stringent screening and retention policies for criminology students as regards grade point average and curriculum enrichment and periodic review of the course contents, in consultation with the subject-experts, should be done.
Downloads
References
[1] PRC [Internet]. c2011~2015. Mandate; [cited 2015 March 29]. Available fromhttps://goo.gl/mSPwyq
[2] RA 1080—Provided under Item No. 5, Part V of the Revised Policies on Qualification Standards.
[3] Republic Act No. 11131, or the Philippine Criminology Profession Act of 2018.
[4] RA 6506, an Act Creating the Board of Examiners for Criminologists in the Philippines and for Other
Purposes.
[5] CMO 21, series of 2005
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
