Nature and Level of Support to the Community based Fisheries Activities in the Coastal Towns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/p71qbp63Keywords:
Fisherfolks, Association, Stakeholders, AssistanceAbstract
This study generally aimed at determining the nature of support institutions to community-based fishery activities, specifically, the profile of respondents, actual support to fisherfolks along Technical services, supply services for fisheries productivity, and supply infrastructure facilities; encountered fisherfolks problems and proposed intervention program. Respondents utilized in the study were chairpersons and members of the different accredited fisherfolk associations in Northern Cagayan. Structured questionnaires and an interview guide were employed to gather data. More so, total enumeration was employed. To obtain data on the problems encountered, focused group discussion was used. Result revealed that most of the respondents engaged in fish cage operation, marine fishing, grow-out tilapia, aquasilvi and oyster culture are males, married, high school graduate with capitalization of 41,000-50,000. Municipal C had the highest distribution of fisherfolk association members. The respondents were found to be financially assisted; however, as regards supply support along fingerlings, equipment, and facilities, tilapia and bangus are the fingerlings distributed in the different municipalities but are supported as to equipment and facilities. Further, the most pressing problem encountered by the respondents is on project management and prompt replacement of damaged items. Finally, to strengthen the support mechanism of the government on the fisher folk community, the program of inclusive planning as intervention was raised.
Downloads
References
[1] Aquino, Ani, P.; Festejo, M. (2013). The Philippine Fisheries Code: National Policy for Sustainable Fisheries.
FFTC Agricultural Policy Articles.
[2] Lim, C. et al. (1995). Problems and constraints in Philippine municipal fisheries: The case of San Miguel
Bay, Camarines Sur. Environmental Management Volume 19, Issue 6, pp. 837–852.
[3] Executive Report (2016). Local Government Unit of Aparri.
[4] OECD (2017), “Support to fisheries: Levels and impacts”, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers,
No. 103, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/00287855-en
[5] OECD (2006). “Financial Support to Fisheries Implications for Sustainable Development”. OECD
Committee for Agriculture Fisheries.
[6] Philippine Fisheries Profile, 2014. Fisheries Policy and Economics Division, BFAR, Dept. of Agriculture,
Quezon City, Philippines. 70p.
[7] Philippine Statistics Authority. (2016).Country STAT Philippines. Retrieved from Philippine Statistics
Authority: www.countrystat.psa.gov.ph/?cont=6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.