Proverty Alleviation Models and Strategy in Moluccas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/4tpkxk64Keywords:
Poverty, Panel Data Regression, SWOT AnalysisAbstract
In the past few years the existing data shows that economic development continues to improve. Some macroeconomic indicators show a continuous increase, especially economic growth which continues to be above the national average and inflation is under control. However, Maluku's GRDP per capita is still below the National average, which causes the poverty rate in Maluku to remain high.The purpose of this study was to see how much influence the macroeconomic variables have on the Ministry of Health in Maluku and prepare a policy plan in the form of a poverty alleviation strategy in Maluku.This study used an econometric model ofPanel Data Regression (Pooled Least Square) with the Fixed Effect Model scheme combined with SWOT Analysis as an additional analysis to answer the objectives of this study. The results of this study indicate that macroeconomic variables have a significant and negative influence on the poverty level of 0.21%, which means that an increase in economic growth will reduce poverty by 0.21% while the inflation variable has a positive and significant effect on poverty by 0.14%. Meanwhile, the SWOT Analysis produced several recommendations among others: Increased coordination with the central government, Increasing the role of the community and business world in poverty alleviation, Increasing accessibility and economic equality, Optimizing the Utilization of Village Funds.
Downloads
References
1. Acemoglu, D. (2008). Introduction to modern economic growth. In Introduction to Modern Economic
Growth. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00816.x
2. Adler, J. H. (1959). THE STRATEGY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Kyklos.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1959.tb01824.x
3. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2014). Entrepreneurial Opportunities and Poverty Alleviation.
Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12078
4. Anonim, 2015. Data Publikasi Program PenanggulanganKemiskinan Dan PemberdayaanMasyarakat Di
Maluku Tahun 2014 [Poverty Reduction Program and Community Empowerment Program Publication
Data in Maluku in 2014].
5. BPS Indonesia. 2017. IndonesiaDalam Angka BerbagaiTerbitan [Indonesia in Figures of Various
Publications]. Indonesian Central Bureau of Statistics.
6. BPS Maluku. 2015. Data &InformasikemiskinanKabupaten/ Kota Di Indonesia [District / City poverty
data & information in Indonesia]. Central Bureau of Statistics. Jakarta.
7. BPS Maluku. 2017. Maluku Dalam Angka BerbagaiTerbitan. Badan Pusat StatistikProvinsi Maluku
[Maluku in Figures of Various Publications. Central Bureau of Statistics of Maluku Province]. Ambon.
8. BPS Maluku. 2015. ProfilKemiskinan Maluku. Badan Pusat StatistikProvinsi Maluku [Maluku Poverty
Profile. Central Bureau of Statistics of Maluku Province]. Ambon.
9. BPS Maluku. 2016. IndikatorKesejahteraan Rakyat Provinsi Maluku 2015 [Maluku Province People's
Welfare Indicator 2015]. Central Bureau of Statistics of Maluku Province. Ambon.
10. BPS Maluku. 2016. ProfilpengangguranProvinsi Maluku 2015 [Unemployment Profile of Maluku
Province 2015]. Central Bureau of Statistics of Maluku Province. Ambon.
11. BPS Maluku. 2015. StatistikKesejahteraanrakyatprovinsi Maluku 2015 (hasil SUSENAS) [Maluku
Province people's welfare statistics 2015 (results of SUSENAS)]. StatistikKesejahteraanrakyatprovinsi
Maluku 2015 (hasil SUSENAS). Ambon.
12. Deininger, K. dan L.Squire (1996), "A New Data Set for Measuring Income Inequality", The World Bank
Economic Review, No.10.
13. de la Croix, D. (2015). Economic Growth. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral
Sciences: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.71057-9
14. Fayissa, B., & Nsiah, C. (2010). The Impact of Remittances on Economic Growth and Development in
Africa. The American Economist. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943451005500210
15. Gujarati, Damodar. 1995. Basic Econometrics.Third Edition. McGraw Hill International Editions.
16. Irawan P. 2006. PenelitianKualitatif dan KuntitatifuntukIlmu – IlmuSosial [Qualitative and Quantitative
Research for Social Sciences].
17. Kanbur, Ravi and Lyn Squire. 1999. The Evolution of Thinking about Poverty: Exploring The
Interactions. http://kanbur.dyson.cornell.edu/papers.htm
18. Liu, Y., Luo, T., Liu, Z., Kong, X., Li, J., & Tan, R. (2015). A comparative analysis of urban and rural
construction land use change and driving forces: Implications for urban-rural coordination development
in Wuhan, Central China. Habitat International. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.01.012
19. Manyara, G., & Jones, E. (2007). Best practice model for community capacity-building: A case study of
community-based tourism enterprises in Kenya. Tourism.
20. MudrajadKuncoro, 2001, MetodeKuantitatif [Quantitative Method],AMP YKPN Jogyakarta
21. Moh. Nazir, 2011, MetodePenelitian [Research methods], Ghalia Indonesia
22. Mankiw,N.Gregory.2000.TeoriMakroEkonomi [Macroeconomic Theory], Ed.4, Jakarta:
PenerbitErlangga.
23. Mills Edwin S, E. M. Pernia (ed.)"Introduction and Overview", ,Urban Poverty in Asia: A Survey of
Critical Issues (New York and Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 1-51.
24. Nazir M. 2003. MetodePenelitian [Research methods]. Jakarta :Ghalia Indonesia.
25. Nurdin, N., Stockdale, R., & Scheepers, H. (2014). Coordination and cooperation in e-government: An
Indonesian local e-government case. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2014.tb00432.x
26. Peterson, M. (2017). Poverty Alleviation. In Sustainable Enterprise: A Macromarketing Approach.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544308654.n14
27. Publishing, B. (2009). Economi-C History Review. Society.
28. Ravallion, Martin, and Shaohua Chen (1997), "What Can New Survey Data Tell Us About Changes in
Distribution and Poverty." The World Bank Economic Review. 11(2).
29. Sato, R. (1964). The Harrod-Domar Model vs the Neo-Classical Growth Model. The Economic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/2228485
30. Schumpeter, J. A. (2006). History of economic analysis. In History of Economic Analysis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203983911
31. Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006). The Theory of Economic Development. In Joseph Alois Schumpeter. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3
32. Solow, R. M. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
33. Thee Kian Wie, 1981, PemerataanKemiskinanKetimpangan [Equitable Poverty inequality]. Jakarta:SinarHarapan
34. Toye, J. (2007). Poverty reduction. Development in Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469427
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
