Lexico-Syntactic in Free Indirect Speech Connectors and the Problem of Marking the Point of View of the Narrator and Character
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/61dbnc88Keywords:
Free Indirect Speech, Means of Cohesion, Discourse, Conjunction, ConnectorsAbstract
The present research aims to determine the features of lexico-syntactic connectors in free indirect speech and to establish the specificity of representing the point of view of the narrator and character through the considered pragmatic markers of free indirect speech. The relevance of the study lies in the development of ideas about the formation (in the cognitive consciousness of the author and the reader) of counterpoint characters voices that form the basis of polyphonic language thinking. The research results complement the currently relevant linguistic concepts of artistic discourse. The purpose and objectives of the study are realized by such research methods as: descriptive-analytical method based on contextual analysis, conceptual analysis, and comparative method. The analysis of 3375 contexts established that the lexico-syntactic connectors can act as an effective means of creating linear continuity of free indirect speech. It is proved that sentences containing lexico-syntactic connectors receive the same interpretation in the text as in the previous context space. It is established that the lexico-syntactic connectors connect not only the preceding and the subsequent discourse segments but also different cognitive states of the character. It is argued that the connectors are triggers to shift from one point of view to another, contributing to the harmonization of different points of view. In conclusion, it is determined that the manipulation of the connecting means in the translation process can significantly affect the reader's perception of the points of view of the characters and the author's narration.
Downloads
References
[1] Omelkina, O.V. Free indirect speech as a linguistic and pragmatic category: on the material of German
Prose: PhD thesis. Samara, 2007. - 21 p.
[2] Sysoeva, V.V. The narrative potential of free indirect speech in a literary text: PhD thesis. Belgorod, 2004.
- 20 p.
[3] Sharapova, Yu.V. Free indirect speech in the functional-communicative and structural-semantic aspects: on
The material of the English language: PhD thesis. SPb., 2001. - 22 p.
[4] Trufanova, I.V. Pragmatics of free indirect speech: PhD thesis. Nizhny Novgorod, 2001. - 46 p.
[5] Halliday, M., Hasan, R. Coherence in English [Text] / M. Halliday, R. Hasan. London: Longman, 1976.
321 p.
[6] Reinhart, T. Conditions for Text Coherence [Text] / T. Reinhart // Poetics Today. – 1980. – № 1. – PP. 161-
180.
[7] Borodenkov, P.A. Markers of reasoning in everyday discourse: PhD thesis. Ivanovo, 2009. - 22 p.
[8] Gelpey, E.A. The constructive role of frames of pragmatic connectivity of utterances in dialogical speech
(on the material of the English language): PhD thesis. Rostov-on-Don, 2007. - 21 p.
[9] Kamensky, M.V. Sociolinguistic paradigm of discourse markers: on the material of the English language:
PhD thesis. Stavropol, 2007. - 21 p.
[10] Kotov, E.A. Sociocommunicative features of the functioning of discursive markers. NCFU Collection of
scientific papers. - 2003. - Vol. 10. - p. 27-33.
[11] Pigrova, E.K. Metacommunicative markers in spontaneous oral speech: PhD thesis. - SPb., 2001. - 21 p.
[12] Couper-Kuhlen, E., Thompson, S. Concessive Patterns in Conversation [Text] / E. Couper-Kuhlen, S.
Thompson // Cause Condition Concession Contrast Cognitive and Discourse Perspective. Berlin: Mouton
de Gruyter, 2000. PP. 381-410.
[13] M.M. Bakhtin [Bakhtin, 1975, 1979, 2002]
[14] Bogin [Bogin, 1982, 1986, 1989, 1993]
[15] I.R. Galperin [Galperin, 1981]
[16] G.G. Infantova [Infantova, 1958, 1962]
[17] O.I. Moskalskaya [Moskalskaya, 1978]
[18] Yu.A. Sorokin [Sorokin, 1982]
[19] Z.Ya. Turaeva [Turaeva, 1994]
[20] V.V. Krasnykh [Krasnykh, 2011, 2012]
[21] P. Werth [Werth, 1999],
[22] M. Fludernik [Fludernik, 1996]
[23] Barker, C. The Hellbound Heart. L.: Vintage, 2002. 254 p.
[24] Davies, R. The Rebel Angels. L.: Penguin, 2002. 397p.
[25] Lawrence, D.H. Sons and Lovers. L.: Penguin, 2002. 314 p.
[26] Woolf, V. Mrs. Dalloway. Penguin, 1999. 213 p.
[27] Woolf, V. To the Lighthouse. Penguin, 2003. 321 p.
[28] Ehrlich, Susan. Point of view: A linguistic analysis of literary style. Routledge, 1990.
[29] Lakan Z. Instantsiia bukvy v bessoz-natel’nom, ili Sud’ba razuma posle Freida. M.: Logos. 1997.
[30] Zalevskaya AA. Psycholinguistic approach to the concept. Methodical problems of cognitive linguistics.
Voronezh: Publishing House of Voronezh University. 2001:154-73.
[31] Zhelvis VI. Emotivnyi aspect rechi. Psikholingvisticheskaya interpretatsiya rechevogo vozdeistviya [The
emotive aspect of speech. Psycholinguistic interpretation of speech influence]. Yaroslavl': YaGPI. 1990.
[32] Borisenko AI, Volokobinskij YM, Kokovina VN, Troshina EP, Chepik LF, Frolova TN. Rare-earth doping
of silicon from silica films. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR. 1982; 262(6):1409-12.
[33] Kiseleva I, Navrotsky A, Belitsky IA, Fursenko BA. Thermochemistry and phase equilibria in calcium
zeolites. American Mineralogist. 1996 May 1; 81(5-6):658-67.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.