Dimensions and levels of linguistic analysis

Authors

  • Fayazova Dilfuza Sadilloevna Bukhara Engineering Technological Institute, Foreign Languages Department Author
  • Mustafoyeva Mavlyuda Anvarovna Bukhara Engineering Technological Institute, Foreign Languages Department Author
  • Djalolov Furqat Fattoxovich Bukhara Engineering Technological Institute, Foreign Languages Department Author
  • Navruzov Barat Baxronovich Bukhara Engineering Technological Institute, Foreign Languages Department Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61841/5tygxs97

Keywords:

Dimensions, levels, layout, linguistic analysis, syntagmatic elements, paradigmatic bond, horizontal linear, syntax, lexicological level, morphological level

Abstract

There are a number of ideas on this matter: some linguists state that there are four units, such as phoneme-phone, morpheme-morph, lexeme-lex, and sentence; others believe that there are five units, like phonemes, morphemes, lexemes, word-combinations or phrases, and sentences. Yet others emphasized that in addition to the mentioned ones, there are paragraphs, utterances, and texts. As one can see, there's no unity in the number of language and speech units. The most well-known opinion is that there are five units of language (speech), and correspondingly there are five language levels; they are phonetic/phonological, morphological, lexicological, syntax-minor, and syntax-major. In this article, dimensions and levels of linguistic analysis are proved and outlined by the authors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Iriskulov A.T. Theoretical Grammar of English. 1985, p.64.

[2] Jespersen O. A. Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part II, Syntax, vol. I, 1927, p. 85

[3] John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. WIREs. Cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Science, 2012. -13 p.

[4] Kirvalidze N. Theoretical course of English grammar. Tbilisi, 2003. – 105p.

[5] Каушанская В. Л. A Grammar of the English Language. Ленинград, 1963. -160 p.

[6] Langacker R. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford University Press, 1987. – 283 p.

[7] Langacker R. Cognitive Grammar. Oxford University Press, 1987. – 573 p.

[8] Quirk, R. A Grammar of Contemporary English. Singapore: Longman Group Ltd, 1980. – 356 p.

[9] Radden G., Dirven R. Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam: University of Hamburg, 2007. – 391 p.

[10] Rasulov Z.I. History of the English language. Bukhara, 2009. -56 p.

[11] Rayevskaya M.N. Modern English Grammar. Кiev, 1976. -72 p.

[12] Robins, R.H. Ancient and Medieval Grammatical Theory in Europe. London, 1951. -137 p.

[13] Slobodkina N.A., Abduraimova B.Y. A practical English grammar. T., 2011. -400 p.

[14] Sweet, H. A New English Grammar. Logical and Historical. Oxford University Press, 1987. -271 p.

[15] Talmy L. Toward a Cognitive Semantics I: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000. 450 p.

[16] Valeika L., Buitkienė J. An introductory course in theoretical English grammar. Vilnius Pedagogical University, 2003. -135 p.

[17] Volkova M.L. Lectures in Theoretical Grammar. National Linguistic University of Kiev, 2003. -33 p.

[18] Akhmedova Mehrinigor, Baqoyeva Muhabbat. Analysis of “Spirituality” Category and its Structure in the English Language. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8, Issue-9S3, July 2019.

[19] Kadirova N. S, AkhmedovaSh.N. Style and skill: critic's artistic ability. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8, Issue-9S3, July 2019.

[20] Kholikova Nozima Nematilloyevna, Saidov Khayrulla Shavkatovich. Observation and Analysis of the Peculiarities of English and Uzbek Detective Genre (in the Examples of J.H. Chase's Works). International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8, Issue-9S3, July 2019.

[21] Kadirova N. S, AkhmedovaSh.N. Style and skill: critic's artistic ability. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE) ISSN: 2278-3075, Volume-8, Issue-9S3, July 2019

[22] Tabatabaei, S.M., Malekmakan, L., Izadpanahi, N., Mansourian, A. Comparative study of the duration of spinal anesthesia with marcaine and lidocaine plus fentanyl between opium abuse and non-abuse patients (2018) International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 10 (1), pp. 341-345. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85057053647&partnerID=40&md5=42366483155aa7ec2b90d6fd688cb273

Downloads

Published

31.05.2020

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 3 (2020): 24 (3) 2020

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 AUTHOR

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.

How to Cite

Dilfuza Sadilloevna, F., Mavlyuda Anvarovna, M., Furqat Fattoxovich, D., & Barat Baxronovich, N. (2020). Dimensions and levels of linguistic analysis. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(3), 394-403. https://doi.org/10.61841/5tygxs97