What Does Recovery Mean to Adults who Self-injure? An interpretative Phenomenological Analysis.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/n8k7mf44Keywords:
Self-Injury,, Self-harm,, Recovery,, IPA.Abstract
A paucity of research has explored the meaning or conceptualisation of recovery from the perspective of individuals who self-injure. This study used semi structured interviews to explore the meaning of recovery from the perspectives of 6 indi- viduals who self-injure, all of whom were accessing support from secondary mental health services. Factors considered to enhance or hinder the recovery process were also explored. Interpretive phenomenological analysis was used to analyse data. Analysis generated three superordinate themes: ‘the recovering self’, ‘evolving relationship with self-injury’, and ‘in- clusion vs. isolation’. Recovery was conceptualised as a multidimensional concept incorporating a broad range of intraper- sonal and interpersonal factors. Gaining control over self-injurious behaviour was regarded as an important element in re- covery, although it was not a defining feature of recovery for participants. This has implications for clinical psychology practice highlighting the danger of treatment approaches that prioritise self-injury cessation at the detriment of other indic- ators of recovery.
Downloads
References
Ahern, L., & Fisher, D. (1999). Personal assistance in community existence: A recovery guide. Lawrence, MA: National Empowerment Center Inc.
Andover, M. S., Pepper, C. M., Ryabchenko, K. A., Orrico, E. G., & Gibb, B. E. (2005). Self-mutilation and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and borderline personality disorder. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 35, 581–591.
Anthony, W.A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychoso- cial Rehabilitation Journal, 12, 55–81.
Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2001). Treatment of borderline personality disorder with psychoanalytically oriented partial hospitaliza- tion: An 18-month follow-up. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 36– 42.
Briere, P.M., & Gil, E. (1998). Self mutilation in clinical and general population samples: prevelance, correlates and functions. Amer- ican Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 609-620.
Capponi, P. (2003). Beyond the Crazy House: Changing the Future of Madness. Toronto: Penguin.
Chapman, A. L., Gratz, K. L., & Brown, M. Z. (2006). Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: The experiential avoidance model. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 371–394.
Creswell, M. (2005). Psychiatric “survivors” and testimonies of self-harm. Social Science & Medicine. 1668-1668.
Darche, M. A. (1990). Psychological factors differentiating self-mutilating and non-self-mutilating adolescent inpatient females. Psy- chiatric Hospital, 21, 31–35.
Davidson, L., Borg, M., Marin, I., Topor, A., Mezzina, R., & Sells, D. (2005). Processes of recovery in serious mental illness: Findings from a multinational study. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 8, 177-201.
Deegan, P. E. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11, 11−19.
Department of Health. (2011). No Health without Mental Health: a cross-government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages. London: HMSO
DiClemente, R. J., Ponton, L. E., & Hartley, D. (1991). Prevalence and correlates of cutting behavior: Risk for HIV transmission. Journ- al of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 735–739.
Fade, S. (2004). Using interpretative phenomenological analysis for public health nutrition and dietetic research: a practical guide. Pro - ceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63, 647–653.
Favazza, A. R., & Conterio, K. (1989). Female habitual self-mutilators. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 79, 283–289.
Gratz, K. L. (2007). Targeting emotion dysregulation in the treatment of self-injury. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 63, 1091-1103.
Hawton, K., Arensman, E., Townsend, E., Bremner, S., Feldman, E., Goldney, R., et al. (1998).Deliberate self-harm: systematic review of efficacy of psychosocial and pharmacological treatments in preventing repetition. British Medical Journal, 317, 441-447
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell.
HMSO (2005). The Mental Capacity Act (2005). London: the Stationery Office. From: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2005/ukpga_20050009_en_1 40 41
Hodgson, S. (2004). Cutting through the silence: A sociological construction of self-injury. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 162–179.
Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanstown, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Jeppson, J. E., Richards, P. S., Hardman, R. K., & Granley, H. M. (2003). Binge and purge processes in bulimia nervosa: A qualitative investigation. Eating Disorders, 11, 115–128.
Klonsky, E.D., & Muehlenkamp,J.J. (2007). Self-Injury: A Research Review for the Practitioner. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 63, 1045–1056.
Klonsky, E. D., Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2003). Deliberate Self-harm in a nonclinical population. Prevalence and psycholo- gical correlates. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1501- 1508.
Kool, N., van Meijel, B., & Bosman, M. (2009). Behavioral change in patients with severe self-injurious behavior: A patient's perspect- ive. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 23, 25-31.
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-Behavioural Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford.
Mead, S., & Copeland, M. E. (2000). What recovery means to us: Consumers' perspectives. Community Mental Health Journal, 36, 315-328.
Mezzina, R., Davidson, L., Borg, M., Marin, I., Topor, A., & Sells, D. (2006). The social nature of recovery.Discussion and implica- tions for practice. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 9, 63 – 80.
Muehlenkamp, J. J. (2005). Self-injurious behavior as a separate clinical syndrome. American Journalof Orthopsychiatry, 75, 324–333.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence. (2004). The short-term physical and psychological management and secondary prevention of self-harm in primary and secondary care. Clinical Guideline 16. London: NICE, www.nice.org.uk.
Nock, M. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (2004). A functional approach to the assessment of self mutilative behavior. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 72, 885-890.
Nock, M. K., & Prinstein, M. J. (2005). Contextual features and behavioral functions of self mutilation among adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 140–146.
Nock, M. K., Joiner, T. E., Gordon, K. H., Lloyd-Richardson, E., & Prinstein, M. J. (2006). Nonsuicidal self-injury among adolescents: Diagnostic correlates and relation to suicide attempts. Psychiatry Research, 144, 65–72.
Nock, M. K., Borges, G., Bromet, E. J., et al. (2008). Cross-national prevalence and risk factors for suicidal ideation, plans and at- tempts. British Journal of Psychiatry, 192, 98-105.
Ochocka, J., Nelson, G., & Janzen, R. (2005). Moving forward: Negotiating self and external circumstances in recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 28, 315-322.
Onken, S.J., & Slaten, E. (2000). Disability identity formation and affirmation: the experiences of persons with severe mental Illness. Socioligical Practice, 2, 99-111.
Owens, C. (2010). Interventions for self-harm: are we measuring outcomes for self-harm in the most appropriate way? The British Journal of Psychiatry, 197, 502-503.
Pettie, D., & Triolo, A.M. (1999). Illness as evolution: The search for identity and meaning in the recovery process. Psychiatric Rehab- ilitation Journal, 22, 255–262.
Piat, M., Sabetti, J., & Couture, A. (2009). What does recovery mean for me? Perspectives of Canadian Mental Health Consumers. Psy- chiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 32, 199-207.
Pierce, D. (1986). Deliberate self-harm: How do patients view their treatment? British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 624–626.
Pitt, L., Kilbride, M., Nothard, S., Welford, M., & Morrison, A. P (2007), Researching recovery from psychosis: A user-led project. Psychiatric Bulletin. M. 55-60.
Repper, J. & Perkins, R. (2003). Social inclusion and recovery: A Model for Mental Health Practice. Balliere Tindall, Edinburgh.
Ridgeway, P. (2001). Restorying psychiatric disability: learning from first person recovery narratives. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journ- al. 24, 335-343.
Ryle, A. (2004). The contribution of cognitive analytic therapy to the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Personal - ity Disorders, 18, 3–35.
Shaw, S. N. (2006). Certainty, revision, and ambivalence: A qualitative investigation into women's journeys to stop self-injuring. Wo- men & Therapy, 29, 153-177.
Sinclair, J., & Green, J. (2005). Understanding resolution of deliberate self-harm: Qualitative interview study of patients' experiences: British Medical Journal, 330, 1112.
Smith, M.K. (2000). Recovery from severe psychiatric disability findings of a qualitative study. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 24, 149-158.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Sage Publications Ltd.
Smith, J.A. & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith, J.A. (ed.) Qualitative psychology. A practical guide to research methods. London: Sage.
Spaniol, L., Gagne, C., & Koehler, M. (1999). Recovery from serious mental illness: What it is and how to support people in their re- covery. In R.P. Marinelli & A.E. Dell Orto (Eds.). The psychosocial and social impact of disability (pp. 409–422). New York: Spring- er.
Starks, H. & Brown Trinidad, S. (2007). Choose your method: a comparison of Phenomenology, Discourse Analysis, and Grounded Theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 10, 1372-1380.
Strong, M. (1998). A bright red scream: Self-Mutilation and the Language of Pain. New York: Penguin.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
